No other politician would ever do this:
Donald J. Trump plans to throw Bill Clinton’s infidelities in Hillary Clinton’s face on live television during the presidential debates this fall, questioning whether she enabled his behavior and sought to discredit the women involved. Mr. Trump will try to hold her accountable for security lapses at the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and for the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens there. And he intends to portray Mrs. Clinton as fundamentally corrupt, invoking everything from her cattle futures trades in the late 1970s to the federal investigation into her email practices as secretary of state.
Drawing on psychological warfare tactics that Mr. Trump used to defeat “Lyin’ Ted” Cruz, “Little Marco” Rubio and “Low-Energy” Jeb Bush in the Republican primaries, the Trump campaign is mapping out character attacks on the Clintons to try to increase their negative poll ratings and bait them into making political mistakes, according to interviews with Mr. Trump and his advisers.
I have no idea if Trump has ever heard of the amygdala hijack, will craft these attacks for shock, persistence, and focus, or will try to use physical/mechanical techniques like eye contact and sudden sharp emphasis on trigger words/concepts. But even without that, given Hillary’s frail state and the length of a debate, simply the shock of being so openly and fearlessly challenged may allow us to see a real life amygdala hijack, with stroke-like symptoms, right on live TV.
In addition, Roger Stone has put out a book on the women Bill abused, and how Hillary tried to destroy them, and he will be turning out a video documentary from the book, featuring interviews with each of the women. Supposedly the documentary will be devastating, and I am sure Trump will promote it at some point with a tweet.
Even if Trump had campaigned as a Liberal, but promised to put the kibosh on the Clinton crime machine once and for all, I would have supported him. Given that he appears to also be loyal to America, and pro-gun, supporting him is clearly the only option.
[…] Why Trump Is Worthwhile No Matter What […]
Trump might even buy time to run the documentary in prime time on a major network.
I think Trump has an instinctual knack for manipulating people and throwing them off guard. I’m really interested in seeing how he applies it to dealing with international issues. Personally, I think he could stand nose to nose with Putin and Putin would blink first.
And I am NOT a Trump fanboy, I was supporting a couple of the other folks running for the nomination. If Trump gets the nomination, which is quite likely but not certain, I will vote for him.
You’re welcome.
It may seem like a small thing but after learning the Talmud I believe people have a right to their own property and earnings. That mainly comes from learning the parts of the Talmud that deal with civil law, and property laws. [Ketubot, Bava Kama etc.] Since it seems to me the only one of the candidates that respects people’s private property is Trump, I support him. That is really all there is to it.
The Slippery Slope isn’t a fallacy when you call it the Overton Window.
Even with the clear examples which should have warned them, it appears the Clinton camp still has no idea what is about to happen to it. Their imaginations can’t encompass the concept of a Republican who will reject their premise when they hurl the usual racist/sexist/whatever slurs. Of a Republican who will actually get into the mud with them and fight in a totally unrestricted way and to win.