American Thinker asks the question:
A few days ago, I caught Trump’s speech to the Building Trades Unions National Legislative Conference. In a nutshell, Trump vowed to fix the job-killing, out-of-control, crazy regulations harming businesses. Trump said, “One of my first acts as president was to stop one of the great sellouts of the American worker.” Calling NAFTA a disaster, Trump said he took us out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The audience erupted with applause.
Trump is swiftly dismantling many of Obama’s anti-America agenda items.
It dawned on me: this guy is simply implementing commonsense policies in the best interest of America and her citizens who elected him. So why is the American left responding with such unprecedented vitriol and bold, treasonous obstructionism? The simple answer is that leftists hate America and her biblical values. Therefore, when Trump came along vowing to make America great again, he ignited the leftists’ hate, fear, and rage. Why such hate for one’s own homeland?
Before you call me crazy, let us review…
You cannot understand leftism in terms of logic or reason. Leftism is a biologically programmed suite of urges. Leftists are fleshy robots, programmed to betray those around them to outsiders, as a means of competing. If they can’t send their warriors overseas to die, they will import the enemy to their homeland and try to start the fighting there. This betraying leftist strategy exists because evolution tested it, and it worked.
The Chuck Schumers of the world did not survive by picking up swords and spears, and charging into battle with their nation’s warriors. They survived by getting their warriors into fights with outsiders, and then betraying them to those outsiders. Once those outsiders killed off all the warriors, then Chuck Schumers enjoyed all the benefits of being the only guys left in a nation of single females.
I don’t know why it is so difficult to process that a species as complex as humans would have evolved a cheating competitive strategy of betrayal like so many other species have. Liberalism is that anti-competitive, cheating strategy.
Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because the left is our sworn enemy
It’s funny how in the last few years I’ve been unable to continue avoiding all the “coincidences” around (((Chuck Schumer))) and his (((fellow travelers))).
[…] Why Do Leftist’s Hate America? […]
“Leftists”
I think viewing this as all r vs. K is too limiting – yes, that is an important paradigm, and it tells us a lot about the rank-and-file leftists, as well as those who are leftists against their own.
But sometimes, it is K vs. K, using r as foot soldiers.
I think the problem with Chuck Schumer and Luis Gutierrez is not so much a lack of loyalty to their nation, it is that in the end they do not really view the United States as their nation, but as a foreign nation to be exploited whenever possible.
Put another way, there is a lot of merit to r vs. K, it is a lot of the issues facing us now, but it is not everything.
I saw this and thought “Should send a letter to the author via the editors and give him a link to this page – it would explain it for him.” I’ve read that authors posts for a while and generally he 1 Loves America, and 2 seems smart enough to understand r/K – I swear some people are not bright enough to understand it, let alone the implications.
“Once those outsiders killed off all the warriors, then Chuck Schumers enjoyed all the benefits of being the only guys left in a nation of single females.”
I can’t imagine this is how it worked. The outsiders don’t fight for nothing, and if female nature is any indication they threw their legs open for their new masters. If there is an evolutionary advantage to being a traitor to your tribe, it may have been in “protecting” the women while the real men were off fighting. But it is highly unlikely the limp-wristed r-selected weasels ruled the roost after the outsiders achieved victory.
Unless the victors returned home to their families, and left the Schumers as their personally selected local managers. I mean just look at the numbers. Suppose two civilizations meet, each one with 98 men, 2 Schumers, and 100 women. After the battle, the two civilizations combined probably have <98 men, 4 Schumers, and 200 women, and most of the 98 men will likely return home.
I have zero doubt Schumer is designed to betray his own K-selected people to increase K-selected mortality, and that is a benefit for rabbits.
AC, before r/K I would have read this one differently. now I see how not just individuals but the whole society has drifted massively r.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/04/why_republicans_cant_fix_the_big_problems_.html
As to onezero talking about the ‘Schumers’ They don’t want the women permenently, just for a few nights while the other men are off fighting is fine, infact preferable as they won’t be stuck with a woman and baby. So in the primative society, having 1/2 the men gone with the 2 sleezes left in the tribe means that they get easier access to woemn
It is also worth noting that genetic drift research indicates that 80% of women but only 40% of men passed on their genes. Granted this is looking at the last 10K years, and Western monogamy is relatively (since about AD400) new, and western. This means that in most other times, the men were expended rapidly and the women had to share. There are many ways this could occur, and it coudl be one ‘boss man’ keeping 1/2 the women and the reamining 1/2 spread through the rest of the males. (think of Sultan haram’s for examples). This sort of social enviroment would create presures on the genes that are complemented or complement r/K.