We Are Shadowbanned On Twitter, For Talking About Surveillance

We have become the first conservative to be documented to be shadowbanned on Twitter under Elon Musk, and not for hate, or racism, or “misinformation,” or “election denial,” but for simply talking about the surveillance state in America.

I tweeted this at James O’Keefe, with a link to my surveillance page, and when I pull up James’ tweet, I see it as a reply, but I was informed by other tweeters that when they look at James’ tweet, they do not see it as a reply, though they see it as a reply to James’ tweet when they go to the address of my reply, and they see it in my timeline, as a reply to James’ tweet.

When I open James’ tweet in a private window, and logged out, I can confirm, the reply is not there under James’ tweet, as if I never sent it. So Twitter under Elon Musk is luring in dissidents, getting them to spend their precious time and energy there, and then if they post something that would be effective at revealing corruption, Twitter hides it so you are basically screaming into a void, and nobody will hear you. And even worse, the site will show you the reply where it should be as if it has been posted and is visible, to trick you into thinking you are talking to people, and continuing to waste your time on the site.

If Elon wants to delete my tweets, fine, do it and let me see you deleted my tweet, so I can go somewhere else and not waste my time. Don’t lie to me about posting my material to trick me into wasting my time. That is what they are doing, and it is a fundamental, malicious breach of trust between user and platform. The site is wasting your time, and lying to you. Twitter his acting as a hostile enemy.

Interestingly, when I run shadowban tests, I find I am not shadowbanned. Here is the test at https://shadowban.yuzurisa.com/:

Here is the test at https://hisubway.online/shadowban/

Here is https://taishin-miyamoto.com/ShadowBan/, which does show a search ban:

This leads to the interesting question of whether the intel operation running everything, including Twitter (still), has put up these shadowban testers too, to tell dissidents they are not shadowbanned, when they are, so they will go to Twitter and continue to waste their efforts and their time screaming into the void, rather than building their own platform.

None of this is surprising. We are at the tip of the spear of the corruption and the covert intelligence operation that has rigged our elections and is destroying this country. And we assemble an influential case at my surveillance page for the assertion it is localized, in every neighborhood, and acting against people at the grassroots level. That is why I included as a link in the reply to James. They cannot allow people to see that, which is why I am forcing them to act in ways they would prefer people not see or know about.

So on the one hand, I know they have to suppress this material. If they do not, and people see the Stasi-like intel operation they have assembled, the Civil War will start, and if the population is surveillance aware when it starts, they might not be able to control the outcome. So I know it has to be suppressed.

And I know when I reply to a popular tweet, on topic, with that amazing surveillance page as a link, the tweet gets hundreds of thousands of views, and I get like 15 views, seven hits on the surveillance page, and no replies and no followers, something is going on.

And of course, @VoxDay is actually still banned at twitter, without any reason given, and nobody is doing anything about that, despite Elon telling everyone he was lifting all bans. Either Elon is not in charge, or he is lying to everyone because he is part of the conspiracy of elites to screw over the plebes.

I mainly put this out to warn people who want to make a difference – you are wasting your time on Twitter. If you ever happen to gain the opportunity to be effective, they will shut you down when your big moment arrives, because helping you be effective is not the goal. And if you are following people on twitter who this is not happening to, chances are they do not get shadowbanned, because they are under the control of this intelligence op, and when the crucial moment comes, they will screw you over too.

Containing you and thwarting you if you ever happen to almost get to be effective is the goal.

Form your own platforms, build your own audiences, make real connections, and never take anything they offer you for free, including their conservative celebrities, or “respected voices.” They are all corrupt.

And spread this post wherever you can, so our kind know that Twitter is a trap.

Spread r/K Theory to your friends, because the truth cannot be suppressed

This entry was posted in Surveillance. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
FtR
FtR
1 year ago

Are anons able to quote-post your reply in a reply to OKeefe?

Farcesensitive
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
1 year ago

Someone should try contacting him through other ways that are harder to control.

Bman
Bman
1 year ago

I can confirm the shadowbanning.

Aurini
1 year ago

I saw a brief burst of responses to my tweets when Elon took over, only for it to die down again shortly thereafter.
Had some knob-job accuse me of buying fake followers.
Doesn’t surprise me.

Kentucky Gent
Kentucky Gent
1 year ago

I mainly put this out to warn people who want to make a difference – you are wasting your time on Twitter.”
AC, Please try Gab!

Chief_Tuscaloosa
Chief_Tuscaloosa
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
1 year ago

Please consider this shadowbanning page as your second post on Gab, after your surveillance page

trackback
1 year ago

[…] ← We Are Shadowbanned On Twitter, For Talking About Surveillance […]

AnonymousBill
AnonymousBill
1 year ago

Tucker Carlson turns on the “media”…
Is he tacking in the wind, calming the mark, maintaining his position as controlled opposition? Or genuine?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CL–KXNZxVA&t=23s

Last edited 1 year ago by AnonymousBill
Corn Pop
Corn Pop
1 year ago

I have a lurking account there but I’ve never posted. The entire site seems like an estrogen fueled nightmare. The drama and toxicity emanating from that dung-heap has greatly accelerated the fall of the West. It’s negatively affected our society at all levels.

EricTheAwful
EricTheAwful
1 year ago

My account is still permanently suspended. I was mostly lurking on Twatter by Jan 8, 2021. But I followed Trump and several “Q” accounts, so that’s probably why. Most other anons report their accounts have not been reinstated either.

Thesokorus
Thesokorus
1 year ago

Sounds like cope. But I am not willing to blame Elon just yet. Unravelling the construct that is Twitter is a huge task. I wouldn’t doubt Cabal spent a trillion dollars building out the hardware and code behind that front. I doubt if Elon actually has access to the hardware rhat runs Twitter. It’s probably in the District or in a DUMB. Pretty sure he’s said they might need to re-write the whole thing. And the electrical costs are colossal. Mind boggling. I don’t ser how it doesn’t run on DoD infrastructure.

Pablo Villizzianto
Reply to  Thesokorus
1 year ago

Another issue, ¿ who pays for it?

wooderson
wooderson
1 year ago

Pop quiz: Which federal agency runs a clandestine social media surveillance unit known as the Internet Covert Operations Program (iCOP)?

If you guessed the FBI, the CIA, or the Department of Homeland Security – sorry. This one belongs to the U.S. Postal Service (USPS).

This was a tweet by Illuminatibot.

8

59

123

10.1K

Farcesensitive
1 year ago

https://choiceclips.whatfinger.com/2023/03/17/elon-musk-is-being-conned-by-his-own-company-twitter-they-are-still-doing-this/
Elon Musk is being conned by his own company – Twitter – they are still doing this

Atavisionary
Atavisionary
1 year ago

Reposting this comment here.

I checked this out for my account, and using another browser/private my tweets still show up. I would expect that most of how they do it is not by completely hiding tweets but just suppression of how often/to how many people your tweets show up. Basically limiting visibility which they call “impressions”. This could be argued to be part of the algorithm rather than intentional suppression. I mean, I can understand why someone not following you isn’t going to see your tweet.

I was never all that active on twitter, so I don’t really have that much of a following. The most engagement I get is when I interact with accounts that follow me back that have a much larger follower base. Nick land is probably the most high profile account in this category (57k followers), and i’ll get a number of likes/comments when he replies back to me. (most recent has close to 3000 impressions).

I get virtually no engagement with my own tweets by themselves (30-50 impressions per tweet) and I have ~670 followers compared to your 118. This is down from a max of ~1200 back before the massive purges took place and when I was more active. I’ll add that of all the reactionary twitter that was active back between 2014 and 2016, only a handful remain including myself.

While I don’t doubt you are right that political suppression is taking place in general, I am not sure your experience can qualify as a fair test of that. I will give some notes/make some suggestions.

1) You don’t advertise your twitter account on this blog at all. Or at least I couldn’t find it. You also don’t link from your twitter back to this site. There is almost no feedback between the two. 

  a) Advertise your twitter in your daily brief and/or add a tweet widget to the sidebar. You can see what that looks like on my site. 

  b) Fix the spelling of Anonymous conservative in your twitter hand (add the e) and capitalize the C for readability.

2) try to bait your highest profile follower into a conversations. Maybe don’t start immediately with the surveillance on this. (@aetherczar). Try to get more high-follower accounts to follow you and do the same.

3) For most accounts there is generally a close parity between follows and followers. Follow more accounts, you only have 8 follows right now. Mine is atavisionary if you need to start somewhere look through who I follow. For the most part its remnants of reactionary twitter.

4) You have to engage in popular threads for people to notice and follow you so they can see your direct tweets. This is some effort to build up, but you would have to do it for a fair test. Tweets that are meme images, especially funny ones, seem to do the best here.

5) Post your daily brief to twitter every day. You can connect wordpress sites to your twitter account so this occurs automatically. Ask your readers here to follow and retweet the brief.

6) You seem on pretty good terms with Vox Day, maybe he can help you somehow. Set this up as an experiment to try to detect what you are talking about.

I think you would need to make these changes and give an effort increasing followers for a few months before you could really demonstrate the effect you are referring to. Maybe a lot less if Vox helped you.

Atavisionary
Atavisionary
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
1 year ago

Its hard to say. There are almost 3000 replies to that tweet and twitter doesn’t seem to work like a normal forum in how it displays things. I am not sure if that 3000 is only direct replies in which case side conversation might get shuffled sideways. and that may in fact be a fair way to handle displaying things depending on how they did it. I would not be super confident I didn’t just miss it with that many to scroll through since you have to constantly load more. I am not saying you aren’t shadowed banned (believe me I have had my fair share of experience with this and its a ubiquitous thing), I am just saying its hard to be absolutely certain under these conditions.
The fact is your twitter account is not built up at all. Even under ideal circumstances and completely objective/fair algos, your visibility would be close to nil.
However, I think if you have an interest in pushing this and using twitter, you are in a great position to do so. From what I can tell you have a very loyal following on your blog and if you asked them, they would help you boost your twitter account. Personally, I think its worth going for and I will help you however little I am able too.

Atavisionary
Atavisionary
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
1 year ago

Easy things to do is set it up so you automatically tweet the daily and also advertise the account in the daily. Once set up, you could basically just forget about it and it may drive a bit of extra traffic. So at minimum you should do that. Other stuff would take more effort and you are correct I am not sure how actually worthwhile that would be.

Atavisionary
Atavisionary
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
1 year ago

When I go to the following tweet, which doesn’t have thousands of replies, I am able to see your reply in private mode not logged in:
https://twitter.com/SteveWr27630793/status/1636338641403346944
That doesn’t mean you aren’t shadow banned, because I am sure there are other methods of determining I am in your quarantine group, but it is there.

Atavisionary
Atavisionary
1 year ago
Highangelhell
Highangelhell
1 year ago

Never did the Twitter but I have a few people I interact with on faceboosh and I reccomended your site in a comment to a friend while talking about news sites, thinking it would block the web link I typed out, ‘anonymous concervative dot com’ and it was almost instantly deleated. So not even shadowbanned on FB they have the algowhatever set to nuke any mention of your blog.

Farcesensitive
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
1 year ago

It’s also possible that they just wanted to hide your reply to O’Keefe from O’Keefe.
Once enough time had gone by they figured that neither he nor anyone else would be looking at new replies to that tweet of his and they put your reply back.

Pablo Villizzianto
1 year ago

Could see it.

Still, twitter creepped me out when I opened it, and showed me the picture above, of elon musk. Then pointed me to a tendency in argentina about a surveillance cabal whistleblower (jaitt) who died unexpectedly here in argentina, creeping me more.
Another point you should consider, is the usage of intel in the governments of argentina in the 2000s and 2010s. You could even cite argentinian journos, and the current argentinian president alberto fernandez asumption speech (10 december 2019 – idem 2023), when he talked about cleaning the “basements of democracy”, in a commonly used reference to the intel services here. He made an intervention of the argie intel services and even had journos complaining that he practically dismantled them.

You could just cite it as an example of the political, social, economical etc… usage of the intel apparatus.

Last edited 1 year ago by Pablo Villizzianto