Conservatives are debating whether to toss her out:
Senior Conservatives are tonight taking soundings over whether to replace Theresa May as Prime Minister following her dismal general election performance.
With the Conservatives fighting to run a minority government, senior MPs are concerned that Mrs May now lacks the authority to negotiate a successful Brexit.
Party sources suggested Boris Johnson, Amber Rudd and David Davis were being sounded out as possible replacements. Mrs May insisted she wanted to “get on with the job” while failing to acknowledge the scale of the humiliation she faced in Thursday’s election.
Last night, senior MPs from the Democratic Unionist Party arrived in London to negotiate the terms of a deal to prop up the Conservatives and keep them in power.
Her problem was she cucked, in hopes of increasing her appeal, and that demotivated her base. She had two major terrorist attacks and decided to play cuck, rather than go with the K, unite the nation, and win the election overwhelmingly.
The K-strategy is not some milquetoast idea people adopt on a whim. Once the K-strategy is imbued, it is a violent, overpowering urge and adherence to it is, from a cognitive standpoint, a matter of survival. Deviation from it is seen by the amygdala as a cause for rage and unrest. K-strategists are warriors, and they want to fight.
When you try to appeal to that K-strategist cohort with weak, ineffectual advocacy of its urges, or worse, conciliatory entreaties to moderation and compromise with enemies, you will lose the K-strategist support you need to win. K-strategists want the battle, and they want their enemies in the political world destroyed by the most aggressive leader they can find.
Cucking is a formula for eliminating the motivation of your base, and crushing your own turnout. John McCain, Mitt Romney, George H. W. Bush, and Bob Dole all cucked, and all lost. Even George W. Bush barely eeked out a win against Al Gore (and Bill Clinton) because of his “compassionate conservatism.” The only modern successful conservatives were Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump, both highly non-cucking politicians.
The left is already sensing the weakness, and saying their key to victory is increased leftism:
Bernie, like Corbyn, offered hope that another world was possible. He’s exactly the kind of candidate the Democrats must rally behind in the future
Had he been the Democratic party’s nominee, Bernie Sanders could have won the presidency. I’ve been waiting more than half a year to say this aloud, and today’s as good a day as any to get it off my chest.
I’m not saying this just because Jeremy Corbyn’s amazing candidacy, inspiring perhaps more than 70% of 18-24 year-old British people to vote, skewered Theresa May’s trash austerity politics and imperiled her prime ministership.
I’m saying this because it’s a good moment to reflect upon how, if the so-called left (especially the Labour party in the UK and the Democratic party in the US) rallied around candidates who supported actual leftist politics – a commitment to strong labor protections, a confidence in creating a robust safety net, an aversion to working for Wall Street, a distaste for fighting to get “centrist” votes, and an unwavering commitment not to back down to intimidation from the right – their candidates could win.
Either the right in Britain will go full UKIP and use a Nigel Farage-esque leader, or it will fall apart and lose election after election. Either way, May is now a proven failure.
One thing which could help immensely though, is the spread of r/K Theory. The young are very socially conscious. Once the political battle is couched in terms of rabbits and wolves, those younger voters are not going to want to be identified as disloyal, selfish, helpless rabbits.
At the very least r/K will take the wind out of the rabbit’s sails, and demotivate the young who might otherwise identify with the left and support them politically. Its widespread introduction would be to the left what a cuck candidate is to the right. In politics demotivation of your opposition is often more powerful than appeal, because it takes a lot of motivation to get an individual out to the polls, but it takes very little motivation to motivate a voter to do nothing.
There are many reasons r/K will eventually dominate the political world. One of the more potent reasons is that spreading it will hold the key to gaining power for a lot of future right-wing leaders. Thus a lot of people who will attain great power will spread it to advance their own issues.
Tell others about r/K Theory, because demotivating leftists is the key