A woman’s college goes all in on pronoun-conflict avoidance:
Apparently, the use of incorrect pronouns can be “institutionalized violence.”
Scripps College, a private all-women’s college in Southern California, is giving students ten pronoun options to choose from in their student portal accounts — including “hu, hum, hus, himself,” “Just My Name Please,” and “None.”
It’s not clear what the hell students who choose “None” are supposed to be called, especially since “Name Only” is another option. Are they (oops! I said “they!”) asking to not be spoken to at all? Because that sounds like a microaggression.
The other eight options are “E/Ey, Em, Eir/Eirs, Eirself/Emse,” “Per, Per, Per/Pers, Perself,” “Zi, Hir/Hirs Hirself,” “Ze, Zir, Zir/Zirs, Zirself,” “They, Them, Their/Theirs, Themse” (used as a singular pronoun) and — yes — the archaic “He, Him, His, Himself” or “Her, She, Hers, Herself.”
K-strategists expect an environment with conflict. They see conflict as part of their world. It doesn’t bother them in the least. The most K-environment is like a martial arts club. Guys try to knock each other’s heads off or strangle each other unconscious, but it is all just how the world is – nothing is personal. You shake hands after the bouts, and even go out for beers after that. Just as an example, when I log into Castalia House to buy something, the welcome screen says, “Welcome back, Asshole!” No kidding, my account really does, and I smile every time I see it. You wonder why SWAT guys and military men rib each other?
The problem with r-strategists like liberals is not the r-selected environment they demand. It is the individual who is adapted to that environment, who is so expectant of a totally conflict-free environment that they cannot even bear to hear someone use the pronoun “him” for a man and “her” for a woman without freaking out. The slightest hint of a possible failure to consider every individual’s most silly and minor demand ahead of time sets everyone on edge, and before you know it some feminist is on a rampage and there are no rabbit survivors.
There is a solution for this, and it rhymes with Hapocalypse. Once you have to navigate a gauntlet of heavily-armed blood-thirsty savages on your way to class, should you be lucky enough to make it there with all your appendages then suddenly someone referring to a woman as “she” isn’t quite as big a deal as everyone makes it out to be.
I for one can’t wait.
Ho’pocalypse cometh™
[…] By Anonymous Conservative […]
[…] The Tyranny of Pacifism In Colleges – […]
I, for one, am starting to become concerned about all the SJWs who are so afraid of being “triggered.” Do they become violent when triggered? Is is safe to be around them if they are triggered?
So what’s that called? Rabbit punching back twice as hard? LOL
As a general rule, they can’t get violent. They can opportunistically freak out, if they think there is no risk of violence, and if they think their freak out can precipitate a social retreat by others, thus ceding social status and power to them.
It is kind of like the amygdala is programmed to freak out, and drive behavior. If things are violent, it freaks out and drives hiding. But if violence is verboten, and the SJW knows they are protected, then the amygdala freaks out over minor shit, hoping to make it go away, and give them power over others.
Once the bullets start flying more regularly, the rabbits will hide.
Sorry, poorly expressed on my part. I meant it more as a challenge to the r-selected SJWs, analogous to the way r-selected will hide out in a K-selected environment when they mimic competitors but don’t actually compete. The mirror is K-selected punishing the r-selected using the r-selected’s own techniques of expressed fear and victimology.
But you’re right, the rabbits will hide.
BB
I vote for “It” for any who seem confused about their gender.
Just to play it safe, don’t you know.
hmmm… Maybe “shit” would be more appropriate.