Nothing will destroy feminism like this:
High school girls in Alaska are crying foul after a male sprinter took home all-state honors in girls’ track and field. According to local reports, it was the first time in Alaskan history that a male athlete competed in the girls’ state championships.
Haines senior Nattaphon Wangyot advanced to the state finals in the 100-meter and 200-meter events. He won fifth place in the 100-meter dash and third place in the 200-meter. In both events, he competed against girls as young as ninth grade.
One of the girls Wangyot beat out for a slot at the state meet, Hutchison runner Emma Daniels, took issue with allowing a male athlete to compete in girls events.
“I’m glad that this person is comfortable with who they are and they’re able to be happy in who they are, but I don’t think it’s competitively completely 100-percent fair,” she told a local CBS station.
Girls never realized that they were given their own leagues as a courtesy, so they could play too. Once we eliminate the gender barrier in sports, you will not see any girl saying things like this:
The newly crowned Miss USA is a 26-year-old Army officer from the District of Columbia who gave perhaps the strongest answer of the night when asked about women in combat.
“As a woman in the United States Army, I think … we are just as tough as men. As a commander of my unit, I’m powerful, I am dedicated,” Deshauna Barber said. “Gender does not limit us in the United States.”
With that will go feminism.
Feminists predicate feminism on the idea that women are just as capable as men in all the endeavors men engage in. If boys spend their entire lives competing directly against girls in free competition and beating them senseless, it will not be long before they will view girls as unable to compete with men in any physical endeavor. It will also not be long before girls begin to seek out the endeavors which they are meant for, where they can honestly compete with men.
After spending their lives watching women unable to even beat the weakest man in wrestling, football, lax, or just about any other sport, I’d expect that generation to hire a lot fewer female police officers, firefighters, and military combat specialists.
Yin into yang. Everything taken to its extreme will bring about its polar opposite. Let the SJWs have full reign, and it will not be long before the turn the entire populace K.
[…] The End Of Feminism Is Here […]
This is the best commentary I have seen about the situation in the USA
[…] Anonymous Conservative on how transsexual “rights” will kill feminism. […]
I wouldn’t be so sure yet. You would think that one mixed martial artist tranny who keeps breaking “her” opponents’ faces would be enough to make people realize how retarded this whole thing is. But nope, “she” keeps on a smashin’ “her” “competition.”
In short, the best way to kill feminism is to let it destroy itself.
Either that or the government will start mandatory handicapping.
Forcing men to wear heavy weights and headphones blaring random noise every few seconds.
yes it will destroy itself but not before destroying countless lives in the process.
we who let this bullshit exist are guilty by our inaction. we handed over our schools and governance to these lying freaks and we will reap what we sowed.
This line of reasoning reminds me of a great programming blog I read some time ago. The premise was “Broken gets fixed, but shitty lasts forever.” The point there was that subpar legacy software would continue to be used until it was no longer functional.
There’s seems to be an analogy here. Damaging social movements will be permitted to the point they destroy society’s ability to function, or are so broken they destroy themselves. So feminism is of the latter variety in your description. It is pushing itself to the point that its inherent logical contradictions can no longer be contained.
I have to wonder if the same doesn’t hold for the immigrant crisis in Europe. Even today, most of what is considered to be right-wing over there still advocates for a “normalized” immigration policy. The want Muslim immigrants, just not in an uncontrolled deluge. Controlled, but liberal, immigration is a shitty policy. Uncontrolled immigration is a broken policy. If the latter continues, the effects on society will be so damaging that they will have to be fixed.
The paradox then is, that for all of us that want to European nations to remain white ethnostates, we should desire unrestrained Muslim immigration.
Broken gets fixed, but shitty lasts forever… Very astute point.