Great transcript of an interchange between the migrants and a Swedish girl they happened across:
Man: ‘Can I make sex with you?’
Girl: ‘What did you say?’
Man: ‘Can I make sex with you?’
Girl: ‘But, he tried to touch my a**, do you think that’s ok?’
Man: ‘Who?’
Girl:’He, the guy who just walked past, your friend! Is it ok to touch my a**, or what?’
Man: ‘I don’t understand what you mean.’
Girl: ‘I’m sorry? What don’t you understand? He touched my a**. You’r friend grabbed my a**, what do you want? What do you want?’
Man: ‘No, No. Can I make sex with you?’
Girl: ‘No. Never.’
Man: ‘Why?’
Girl: ‘Absolutely not. Go! Leave!’
Man: ‘Why?’
Girl: ‘I am recording this whole thing, so yeah, mate keep going.’
Man: ‘I’ll give you money.’
Girl: ‘What did you say? Do you think I’m a w****?’
Man: ‘Calm down, I’ll give you money.’
Girl: ‘What do you guys want?’
Clearly these migrants will trigger a rebirth of Victorian values and intellectual greatness throughout Europe, if only they can be given enough welfare benefits.
Migrants are r-strategists. Notice if they could force the girl to “make sex,” they would, and then they would not hang around to raise the kid. That is a behavioral urge designed to create low-investment single parenting. Note also, there are liberal women in Europe who are probably banging these migrants, viewing them as a dangerous, exciting adventure. If they were in a state of nature and got pregnant, the dad is not going to hang around to raise the kid, nor is the mother likely to stop screwing around and raise the child intensively. You get rabbit-like single-mothering rearing styles.
All of these characters will vote for the welfare state, seek free, easy resources, and exhibit sexual laxness. The traits are linked often enough, and they can be seen to share space in the same brain structure. This is an evolved brain program. It is the r-selected reproductive strategy.
Fortunately, it will not do well in Apocalypse, and Apocalypse is exactly what we have coming.
[…] By Anonymous Conservative […]
One of the interesting sub-topics in r/K is identifying leftists. This post is one example. Are people who display more anxiety or phobias more likely to be leftists? I think leftists being more neurotic was discussed in the book. For example, this feminist has an irrational phobia of telephone calls:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/blaghag/2013/08/why-are-you-calling-my-texting-device/
To the extent the phobia is amygdala sensitivity, and involves avoiding something tolerable at all costs, I would assume so.
A swedish-muslim or german-muslim child will always be torn between two identities, and it will mostl likely end up hating its host country (which will be the wealthier one — they don’t go living in muslim or african countries) — they will become miserable SJWs, then. Not only that, but I think mixing people who are diametrically opposed in character and psyche is wrong (as are blacks or muslims and Europeans), and should not be promoted. It will also lower the mean IQ of a country, since blacks and muslims are known for their low mean IQ and their lack of technical aptitude. Also, arabs are high in MAOA-2R, so they are violent and hot-headed. Europe would end up with a dysfunctional population if this became a trend, and once the autochthonous people are gone, Europe’s culture will be gone, too.