Surveillance Detection – The Professional Course of Real Life Experience, Part Four

This will be a reprint of a small surveillance analysis I already did in response to a Q-post in an earlier news brief, covering how surveillance will look in the United States. I am adding here just to consolidate this analysis in one place, and one series, rather than force the new comer to search through the archives.

Q is going again. The format for Q’s posts will be a screenshot image of Q’s post, and immediately below each post will be any links reprinted as text hyperlinks so you can click them, and then my comments in bold. As always, you can see Q’s posts aggregated live, and new ones which may have gone live after our print deadline at http://www.qanon.pub

1st and 10 at the 40.

#40 1st street in Seal Beach is a large vacant lot, surrounded by barbed wire.

It is unusual to see a large undeveloped piece of real estate right on the water in California. And why is it surrounded by barbed wire? That got me curious.

Not that you can judge relative importance with the prevalence of surveillance these days, but it appears likely it is in the area. One sign of surveillance, is to be in an area with no traffic, but every time you hit an intersection a commit unit is present (to call the turn you take to the team that is in a floating box just out of your sight in all directions). That radio call of where you are going allows them to move the box around you without you seeing or knowing that it is moving around you.

If you cruise north along the property line of #40 on 1st street in google streetview, you will note no traffic on either side of you. The street is empty. But approach the intersection at the north at 1st and Marina, and you will note no traffic, but further north, just out of your sight, is a woman pushing a baby carriage:

She could be a commit unit, and call your turn. Notice how just as your car approached her, she walked behind the van so you could not get a good look at her face from the front. Could be coincidence, but if she was surveillance, it would not be. She would have been taught to use things like the van as concealment, so the target would not get a good look at her, and maybe recognize her again if she was used in the future.

Now head south from her along the property line, at the link above, and note no traffic around you, no pedestrians, no bikes, until you hit the next intersection to the south:

One pedestrian, loitering by sitting on his tailgate doing something, ready to call a turn. You continue straight. Next side street, two pedestrians approaching just as you hit it:

Street is still completely empty behind you. You reach the next intersection, and two vehicles come from the east just as you enter the intersection, the nearest one has an open driver’s side window:

Go straight and enter the parking lot, and just as you drive in, a jeep with an open driver’s window is pulling out.

Again, surveillance detection is a game of probabilities. How many times per day does somebody drive out of that lot? A hundred times? Two hundred times? How long does it take them to drive that exit drive, to exit? Five seconds? Say there are people on that little drive for 1000 seconds, or 16 minutes per day. From 7AM to 10 PM (displayed at the gate) is fifteen hours, or 900 minutes. What are the chances someone is on that street at any moment when you are, just as you enter? 1 in 56? Again, it can be innocent one time, even though it is unlikely. But as you play probabilities, over and over again, you begin to tease out the likelihood. And it is beginning to look to me like Cabal was documenting exactly what the google car did in this area.

I zoomed through the parking lot, and there were no other cars entering or leaving, furthering my impression there is not that much traffic this time of day. There were a few pedestrians, and a few bicyclists. I’d assume a few of them were coverage and about to call my exit, but there were too many people to deduce anything. Go back to the last intersection, and make a turn right. Unfortunately google did not save the images from your exit, so you have to make the turn right, to see what it looked like just after the exit. When you do, you see the images below in front of you and behind you (links to the streetview in the images):

So again, it appears the street was empty, except when you got to the intersection, and two cars popped up. The lot was empty, except for right when you began to enter. The first intersection was almost empty, except for a girl who just happened to step behind a van out of sight right as you passed. Every intersection has somebody pointed at you right as you reach it.

We’ll go back to the first intersection, but start at the bridge here, and assume the google car is under surveillance, given what we have seen. You will approach the intersection and turn left for continuity of the timeline, so you don’t jump around. You have two cars in front of you, stopped at a light which turns green just before you approach it. One car turns right, the other goes straight.

I assume they didn’t think you were going to turn left, so they popped the light green with the standard Emergency Services radio remote light control they carry, before you got too close to them, and they took the two directions they thought most likely. There will still be a stationary commit unit at the intersection to call which way you went, but you’ll have to look for it. Spoiler – it is a black SUV with sun damage to the top and hood parked by the side of the road that picks up and turns right the moment you hit the left turn lane:

Note the hatchback pulling in behind him. That is the car that just turned right. He was going to lead you on that street if you turned, until somebody called you were hitting the left lane, and he popped a quick U-turn and parked momentarily behind black SUV so you would not see him hop right on your tail, or make a right turn when he could have just gone straight. At this point, you can begin to conclude they are doing the dance around you, and you are under coverage.

We’ll repeat the approach on this intersection one more time, and just take a look at the first shot we would have seen if we crossed and had gone straight(and slipped into a different timeline from a different trip through this intersection). It is a whole new timeline, from another time the car crossed the intersection. Next to you is a line of three cars going in the opposite direction at the intersection. The last car has an open driver’s side window, common for surveillance to monitor any sounds of significance that would alert them to interesting things that qualify as operational intelligence about you, going on around them, such as a friend yelling at you as you drive by (and as Phelps pointed out, it also prevents anyone from sneaking up on them if they are parked and watching a target):

First car’s driver is actually taking covert video of you with his phone, which is being relayed wirelessly to central control, based on a news story I saw of a local news reporter who got busted doing exactly that to a civilian:

And given the paucity of traffic, I suspect the car tailing you at a distance is one as well:

Notice he is a white pickup with a bedcover that rises just a little bit above the front cab. Also notice, the field is empty:

Now the interesting part. Have you see that truck before? I suspect this photo was taken right before you began driving around that empty field. You drive away from that field, then drove back, and took the street behind you along the perimeter of the field, and by then this truck, with the raised bed cover, had opened the locked gate to that field, and set up a stationary position inside it, so he could watch you as you drove the perimeter of it, probably with a video camera with a telephoto lens:

So Q mentioned a spot, and it looks like when the google car drove into the area, somebody with free access to the secure field was called, rushed to the scene, and may have taken command of the local Cabal surveillance team as he set up a defensive position on that field.

I’ve been looking around NSA facilities for Cabal surveillance, on an assumption Cabal would have been trying to get up on NSA, but it appears Cabal doesn’t bother with their swarming teams around NSA facilities, probably because professionally trained intelligence agents would make this in a minute, and maybe even retaliate with agency resources. So this level of coverage is not all over, though it is in a lot of places – a lot more than anyone would think.

Also, notice that field has a strange large hole dug in it, presumably with an excavator brought in just for that, for seemingly no reason:

Why would you bring a backhoe/eexcavator to an empty field like that (they are expensive to rent), dig a big hole, and then just take off? Plus there are strange lines in the field on the overhead, as if somebody has groomed it with some sort of grooming device. Except for there, where they dug a big hole.

Now, rampant speculation, which is really all we can do with Q posts, which are only made to be understood in retrospect. This makes me wonder if 1st and 10 at the 40 is a reference to 1st street and 10 bodies at address #40. Imagine the look on the faces of the people who put bodies there, if it was. And they couldn’t go back, because by now Q would have his own surveillance set up on the field, and probably have acquired his own cops on the force, aware of the Plan, and committed to help in the Storm, who could swing in and arrest anyone who went near there.

I hate to say it, but that is only about a 20 minute drive from the Standard Hotel. And Cabal had control over everything there when Cabal was ascendant. They could push law enforcement out of the area, and maybe even close off the streets with simulated construction crews if they had to. That field could be really interesting. If I lived there I’d don swim fins and a mask, and try to get in there at night from the water and quietly poke around. Probably get picked up by sound sensors on the poles and surveillance would swarm (followed by a cop called to grab me up and get my ID so they could get up on me), but even the deployment of that around that field would be interesting.

It also makes me wonder if the google car was infiltrated and sent in there to poke around, and maybe Cabal might have done the most logical step once surveillance told them they were compromised (these photos were dated April 2018). They took to disposing of their bodies Dexter-style. Be funny if a Dexter-like dumping ground out to sea came to light before all of this was over, and that was why Q said, “Watch the water.” Anything is possible on this timeline.

One final note – notice the incongruity in the surveillance you saw – namely that you saw it. This isn’t law enforcement, or even intelligence. You will not see FBI surveillance holding a phone up filming you as you drive by them in an intersection. Nor do I suspect they swarm intersections in obvious fashion in unpopulated areas for that matter. And I will bet if you got the IDs of the people involved, they are some average American citizens, some ex-cons, and a lot of immigrants who had citizenship issues smoothed over, who have been wrestled into this by some means. Some even grew up doing this, and despite them having a lot of kids like that, and tons of people, nobody has ever spilled the secret of the existence of this Secret Society force, running strange surveillance procedures which I am sure the pros at the FBI cringe at the sight of. And note, this thing is global, and crosses national boundaries. It is one of the greater puzzles of Cabal, which I hope Q explains someday, because I cannot make heads or tails of it.