Study Shows Surge in Deadly STDs Among UK Gay Men
A steep jump in cases of two deadly sexually transmitted diseases in the UK has been found among homosexual men, a new study says.
Figures from the Public Health England (PHE) indicate the increase in cases of syphilis and gonorrhea among homosexual males rose considerably higher than that of the general population, prompting health experts to say the problem must be a public health priority and that this is likely just “the tip of the iceberg.”
These are just the diseases they are testing for. Within the gay populations throughout the world will be a whole panoply of latent diseases, ranging from meningococcals to shigellas, to antibiotic resistant versions of a whole host of pathogens, and even zoonotic infections acquired from pets (dare I mention gerbils?).
Right now these fester within the gay population and only move out into the normal population occasionally, producing the odd case of a child here and there dying from something like meningitis or a strep infection. But within the gays, these microbes are adapting, spreading, and growing more capable of managing or even overcoming human defenses.
Eventually, when resources grow restricted, the combination of diminished nourishment and stress will suppress human immune systems, and these microbes, capable of holding their own in a strong, relaxed, well-nourished human host will break forth and being killing the weak. The first weak they will spread out into are the homosexual-tolerant populations. That these populations also often exit in high population densities in cities will not help matters.
I’ve often heard it said by liberals that predators are necessary to an ecosystem, because they cull the weak from a population, and make it stronger. Go out with a Barrett .50 Cal and take out a few Great Whites, just for fun, or down a few mountain lions in California, and the environuts will tell you how wonderful the predators are to the species they prey upon, and how we must not meddle in Mother Nature’s plan.
In truth, disease does the same thing, removing weaker specimens from the gene pool. I am so curious if the left will feel the same way about disease when it begins clearing out the left-leaning gay-tolerant city populations, where the citizens are most malnourished and stressed due to their absence of self-sufficiency, and inability to survive the shortage.
Somehow, I’m thinking the left won’t view disease’s gene-cleansing properties quite the same as they view predation’s, when they are the weak and stupid animals about to be culled.
Homosex is a Darwinian Dead End.
We shall have fewer Americans but better Americans.
We must remember to thank them for voluntarily cleansing the U.S. gene pool!
I’m not sure we’ll see a decrease in the number of gay people as there are other factors besides genetics at play. A resource rich environment does increase the amount of “gender-fluidity” and the social acceptance of it. (Because, as the AC said, people don’t have to compete directly with each other for resources. Gender-polarized, hypermasculine behavior then is seen as a liability. ) The mechanisms (social and epigenetic) that drive a person towards homosexuality increase in an r-selected environment resulting in more people who identify as gay or “genderqueer”.
If HIV were a biological weapon spreading through the homosexual community at the rate it’s doing, according to the CDC, the nation would be locked down.
The visceral disgust felt by most people when they see gay, particularly man-on-man, activity is probably an evolutionary adaption. Nothing is more conducive to spreading disease than sodomy. One will note the sight of two women making out does not have the same effect on onlookers.
Not much alternatives for a man who sees another man and can´t help but think that he`s the cutest thing he`s ever seen. Either restrain yourself and be unhappy or act upon it and make some people uncomfortable…with temporary “visceral disgust”.
I just had this mental image of a skit where some smarmy leftist says that kind of thing to a hunter, who looks thoughtful for a moment, then nods his head says “ok” and immediately shoots the leftist.
Rabbit meat tastes good.
Cook it thoroughly, though. Lots of little nasties growing in it.
Personally, I tend towards the idea that the real reason Leftists are so quick to defend predators, parasites or criminals is that, on a subconscious level, they see themselves as such. They know that they are scammers and moochers, who can profit only by harming others.
Ditto for insisting on open borders. “We don’t want people coming here who don’t share our values!” says a conservative. Well, the liberal doesn’t share those values. So he takes what the conservative says there personally.