Molyneux is blowing up lately, but it isn’t surprising. Every interview he does is just two geniuses making the listener feel smarter. Here he interviews Scott Adams:
On August 5th, 2015, Scott Adams predicted Donald Trump would become the next President of the United States. Scott Adams joins Stefan Molyneux to discuss the thought process behind that early prediction, the power of persuasion, the difference between goal and systems thinking, his endorsement of Hillary Clinton – for his own safety, Donald Trump as a master persuader, Hillary Clinton upping her persuasion game and the possible solutions to problems facing the United States.
Scott Adams is the creator of the widely popular Dilbert comic strip that is published daily in thousands of newspapers across the world, he is the author of many bestselling books including “How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big: Kind of the Story of My Life.” Adams is also a trained hypnotist and an expert in the field of persuasion.
Order “How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big: Kind of the Story of My Life” now at: http://www.fdrurl.com/Scott-Adams-Sti…
Blog: http://blog.dilbert.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/scottadamssays
Breitbart: Robert Cialdini Likely Advising Hillary Clinton
http://www.breitbart.com/big-governme…
Social and Political Views of the Unaffiliated
http://www.pewforum.org/2012/10/09/no…
Freedom From Religion Foundation Survey
http://ffrf.org/images/SURVEYMONKEY.pdf
Freedomain Radio is 100% funded by viewers like you. Please support the show by signing up for a monthly subscription or making a one time donation at: http://www.freedomainradio.com/donate
Get more from Stefan Molyneux and Freedomain Radio including books, podcasts and other info at: http://www.freedomainradio.com
Amazon Affiliate Links
US: http://www.fdrurl.com/Amazon
Canada: http://www.fdrurl.com/AmazonCanada
UK: http://www.fdrurl.com/AmazonUK
Bonus Molyneux, courtesy of a commenter – Living Free in an Unfree World at Libertopia:
[…] Stefan Molyneux Interviews Scott Adams […]
There’s something insidious about Adams’ pro-government stance that I could not put my finger on until I remembered he now lives in California. Poor bastard.
I don’t see anything insidious about Scott Adams. I hardly see as he has a stance pro-government or anti-government at all. He does have a pro-survival stance which is quite understandable.
I’ve been an avid listener/supporter of Stefan Molyneux for several years now. His best series, IMO? Gene Wars, based on your book. In fact, it’s what brought me to your book and this blog. I’ve often wondered why you’ve never been interviewed on his podcast. I suspect it’s because you’d rather stay out of the limelight, probably for good reasons.
But man, that would be an interesting interview. Your book lays the excellent foundation for the r/K theory, but this blog puts things in context as far as current events are concerned. I bet his listeners would eat that up. I know I would.
Stefan kindly offered an interview, but at this point, I don’t think the benefits of public association outweigh the fairly huge detriments.
At some day I probably will do an interview, but no now.
OT, but here’s a video showing what happens when K can be held back no longer:
https://kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com/2016/08/21/the-left-hand-of-god/
No one will see K coming. Certainly not the elites who will be blindsided by the rage that’s directed towards them. Despite witnessing some early inklings of this rage themselves, Germany’s leaders have decided to double down and tell their people to suck it up and accept the New Normal of Diversity Enrichment:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/germany-tell-people-stockpile-food-water-case-attacks-154318206–sector.html
The elites and the MSM will be shocked, SHOCKED, when Hitler 2.0 shows up and starts funneling them into ovens. They won’t see him coming. If there are any Jews left in Germany, they had better start planning their exit strategy now, because I don’t think Americans will be in any position to carpet bomb Auschwitz this time around….
while I agree with Molyneux on many (most ) points he has said and sees some things in a way that makes me wince.
case in point are his talks with Bill Whittle where he takes a stance which I consider progressive and is schooled by Bill. I am sure Molyneux does’t see that he takes a progressive stance.
like in this interview he gives the left a platform and make it look ok to have progressive viewpoints. it is a good interview if you want people to vote for hillary.