As you would expect, he was a jihadi, not simply mentally ill:
The British authorities have said Zakaria Bulhan – the 19-year-old Norwegian man of Somali descent arrested on suspicion of murdering American tourist Darlene Horton in London on Wednesday night and stabbing five others – does not necessarily have any links to Islamic terrorism.
However, Heat Street has found evidence that a person using the same name – Zakaria Bulhan – has listed at least one book advocating violent jihadism in their personal account on the Good Reads website since 2014.
Denying jihadism after attacks was the plan up until 9/11. I always suspected that after seeing previous attacks dismissed as accidents or lone nutjobs, Al Qaida decided that they would have to launch an attack which could not be dismissed as anything but a jihadi attack.
In retrospect, it would seem a bad strategy. Not only because it would provoke jihadis to engage in ever more spectacular attacks that couldn’t be denied, but because it would also shield the populace from the effects of stupid policies like importing Muslims in large numbers from areas loaded with jihadi wannabes.
Sometimes you have to let the stupid hurt, if you want to solve the problem.
[…] Somali Knife Attacker Recommended Jihad Book […]
The problem caused by importing large numbers Muslims will not be addressed yet. Not enough people have been murdered.
It is true. Sadly, it will take “X” number of deaths to change the policy. We would have hit X long ago, but our security apparatus is so good, we will import a shitload far beyond what we have now before enough attacks slip through what is an astonishingly immense net. By then, there will be so many that if there is a collapse, and the security apparatus is reduced drastically, we will be looking at 1000X attacks, starting all at once.
Even security apparatus is an r-engendering force.