I thought this was interesting:
Donald Trump brushed off concerns Monday about possible anti-Semitic imagery in a tweet posted from his account.
The tweet, which was posted and deleted Saturday, featured a picture of Hillary Clinton on a backdrop of money next to a six-sided star that read “Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!” It drew widespread backlash almost immediately for resembling the Star of David, an important Jewish symbol.
After the tweet was deleted, a revised graphic was posted to Trump’s Twitter account, this time with a circle subbed in for the star.
“Dishonest media is trying their absolute best to depict a star in a tweet as the Star of David rather than a Sheriff’s Star, or plain star!” the presumptive Republican nominee tweeted Monday.
The stupidity of saying that Trump would supposedly use a Jewish star to malign Hillary, when she isn’t even Jewish (and according to Dick Morris is an anti-Semite herself) is just another example of media bias. But I found it interesting for another reason.
When free associating we are most likely to see the things we were looking at frequently and recently. An architect will see crosshairs as a surveyor’s mark, while a mathematician will tend to think of an asterisk as a “multiplied by” sign. A “Sheriff’s star” is an unusual association to make for a billionaire real estate developer, unless he has been looking at a Sheriff’s star recently. Perhaps Trump is seeing a lot of Law Enforcement Officers on his campaign trips.
However, Sheriff David Clarke has been making waves recently as a Conservative Christian firebrand criticizing Obama and supporting the right to keep and bear arms, even though he runs for his office as a Democrat. He is liked by the Right, has little political history that can be used against him, and as a patriotic black American who doesn’t look like a thinner version of Little Richard, he could easily pilfer an additional 30-40% of the black vote from Hillary, all other things being equal.
On top of that by choosing Clarke, a Democrat who has demeaned the idea of party affiliation in seeking office, Trump would add to his cache as an outsider whom both parties, including the Republican establishment, hate. It would be a firmly anti-establishment law and order ticket, in an era when the approval of the establishment is probably in the single digits, and we are careening toward chaos and anarchy.
Trump likes surprises, because surprises trigger amygdalae, focus attention on him, and make people talk about him for days. Clarke would be an outside the box choice, and generate exactly the type of attention Trump seems to be a master at acquiring.
From a purely political standpoint, I would strongly prefer Allen West. His staunch history of unapologetic conservatism would bring every conservative to the polls, and in conservative’s minds set up the Presidency for sixteen years of anti-establishment conservatism. By contrast, Clarke’s history of running as a Democrat may prove a speed bump to turnout in the minds of grassroots Republicans, something that Trump will have to overcome, perhaps at the cost of his bipartisan appeal.
But this is about predictions, not politics, and I could see in Trump’s mind, Clarke being the superior choice for purposes of broad persuasion of the populace, even if some would see other options as superior.
[…] Sheriff David Clarke For Trump’s VP? […]
I was thinking Allen West for VP months ago, and not because he’s black. He’s conservative, a patriot, articulate, accomplished and not an insider.
When I posted this idea on FB, I was trolled mercilessly while my detractors accused me of suggesting West BECAUSE he was black.
I confess that I did not see that vitriol coming. It was a real bitch slap, even for social media.
I no longer engage anybody on FB regarding politics. Nor do I engage in any type of Reason and Evidence-type argument.
Oh well! Long live President Trump!
Pat Buchanan tried that too. He took a black running mate, choked off the enthusiasm in his white base and killed off his chances for good. Never got any uptick in black votes either. Or even any lasting credit from virtue signallers.
Interesting. I wonder if whites do naturally in-group subconsciously enough to have that effect.
Conservatives do. They tend to see themselves as being played,
Also Hispanics generally hate Blacks so the choice of a Black person is would drive off some Whites and all Hispanics strikes me as a bit foolish.
“and as a patriotic black American…..”
Here you go, pimping for the negroe race.
In the dark of your room at night you know absolutely that the ‘negroe race=r’.
Trump is playing that game too, and I know well the need for a front runner to appeal to the center, but those who understand the Trump phenomenon, know well that Trump has to win via THE WHITE VOTE or let’s just go down the hill[lary] even faster.
Look, I genuinely don’t think you should judge r and K by race. I come from a violent stock of hardcore assholes, and I mean the type of people that a normal person on their deathbed might genuinely regret not having killed. Most of my family never even talked, save for the periodic stab at a family reunion which was destined to end in drunken fights and acrimony. I don’t think that means that I am a defacto asshole, though I’m sure there are more than a few out there that would argue that point.
There are black K’s, and when the shit goes down I would much rather see them on the side of K, than killing fellow K’s. K may be more prevalent in some races than others, but it is not defacto determined by race. You know there are blacks who marry, raise kids carefully, value freedom, and will fight for principle. Fuck Allen West got kicked out of the service for loyalty to in-group.
Now that said, I have no beef with in-grouping, and racism. I think it is a sign of a healthy society when during peacetime the people are dividing up and fighting amongst themselves. The alternative is the kumbaya bullshit we have now, which is a harbinger of the collapse. I also think racism is probably inherent to the K-world, so maybe there is nothing we can do about that.
But I would like to take a stab at making the next apocalypse purely r vs K, instead of what the rabbits want, which is K vs K while the rabbits hide, and survive without a scratch.
I don’t know why you would care if Black K’s were recognized as such, fought in the Apocalypse to eradicate every last rabbit, and then lived peacefully leaving everyone else alone. Personally I’d have no problem with that.
I mean the type of people that a normal person on their deathbed might genuinely regret not having killed.
That was hillarious
Even funnier – I’m not joking. I can think of at least five people that have crossed paths with one of them that if you asked any one of them at the final moment, their last words would be, “That cocksucker! Oh boy, I wished I had….[Gag]”
I thought K was determined by species. That’s the problem with your theory; you’ve just adopted an abandoned ecological discipline to support your black and white politics. We don’t live in a black and white world. You may not be a defacto asshole (whatever that is) but you are an asshole nonetheless.
Can you tell a Republican from a Democrat when you look at their bones?
You do realize you are posting from a static IP, so all the different names aren’t really fooling anyone?
I actually like these comments – keep them coming and I’ll tell you why in a year.
A static IP; listen to you – you’re quiet a computer expert. I’m not fooling anybody with all those different names. Gee whiz; you’re smarter than I gave you credit for!
Do you think I’m still going to be doing this a year from now? I get it, the faggots are comfortably gnawing away the abundant resources while the cowboys sit aghast waiting for society to collapse whereby they will restore order and prosperity until the faggots comfortably gnaw away the resurgent resources while the cowboys sit aghast… Just like Rome and the bubonic plague.
I can understand why you welcome my disruption of your boring malediction but I must remind you that I am not as smart as you. If am rather disappointed when you don’t address my queries such as the one pertaining to the difference between the bones of Republicans and Democrats. Surely a man with your breadth of knowledge could shed some light on the subject. Just make it the fuck up! Be creative and link your hypothesis to some current event that you pilfer from Stormfront.
As a white person, I would love to see an Allen West as VP – and NOT because he’s black. He’s read both the koran and hadith, and absolutely understands the threat of Islam. Trump needs someone who will back him up. Wishy-washy, namby-pamby, lily-livered white guys are a dime a dozen among todays political class. Newt? Christie? Nah! There may be a white guy out there who fits the bill, but don’t write off West because he’s black.
The Holocaust afflicted the West with a kind of civilizational-scale PTSD, for understandable reasons. But Jewish conservatives need to get over being triggered by everything that has a vague whiff of possibly antisemitic symbolism. Performing the proving-I’m-seriously-not-a-racist purification ritual for public figures is a giant expenditure of time and money. Don’t think for a second the Left doesn’t know that, waiting to pounce on every opportunity, at no cost to themselves, to sink their enemies’ resources.
Do you really want to play into that game?
Wow! A dream ticket! Sheriff Clarke for Trumps VP!