Refugee Crisis – Where Does The Money Go?

An interesting article here:

Another big battle is brewing over Syrian “refugees” sweeping into small-town America.

Rural folks in Montana are pushing back against plans by urban elites to plant hundreds of Muslims from the Third World into Helena and Missoula. They plan a protest rally at 10 a.m. Monday in front of the county courthouse in Missoula. And if the pattern holds of similar rallies in Twin Falls, Idaho, and Fargo, North Dakota, a contingent of pro-refugee people will show up to counter protest.

This makes you wonder, who has the time, energy, and motivation to show up to a pro-refugee protest in these podunk areas? Most interestingly, the article goes on to make this little statement:

Nachman has written several letters to the editor to local papers, countering what he says has been dishonest propaganda put out by representatives of pro-refugee agencies that stand to make a lot of money off of the resettlement of Syrians in Montana. One group, Soft Landing Montana, is affiliated with the International Rescue Committee or IRC, which is one of nine major contractors the U.S. government pays to resettle refugees. It wants to bring Syrians to Missoula.

This raises the question, how does the money flow differently due to the influx of refugees? Is this a means of forcing additional debt spending, due to the exigency of the circumstances, and that additional emergency debt spending is being used to fund globalist organizations, perhaps backed by the likes of Soros, who are issuing the marching orders to leaders like Merkel? Do politicians prefer giving government money to immigrants since they will immediately spend the money, rather than save the funds or invest them. Are there politically connected entities getting rich off of this, who are giving sufficient campaign contributions to politicians to buy their fealty? How does diverting government funds to refugees alter domestic economic activity, given the refugee’s immediate spending patterns?

It has always seemed strange that otherwise smart politicians like Merkel would so aggressively pursue their own culture’s suicide. I have heard the argument that this is being done to provide young workers to fuel the social programs required by an aging domestic population, but clearly nobody expects thee migrants to do that. Indeed, they seem to immediately sign up for welfare and socialized housing, only further stressing a system that is already at the verge of collapse.

To this point I have assumed that actions such as Merkel’s are ideologically driven attempts to build a bulwark against the right, but perhaps there is a more immediate financial motive somewhere which we are all missing.