The rabbit quote was very well crafted:
What reality does Crowder live in where things are made better by refusing to understand them [pedophiles]? Never mind that his solution to sex offenders is to shoot them in the head, which goes beyond even the Old Testament law of an eye for an eye and warrants a comparison to the Nazis (who did execute sex offenders—not to mention the disabled—alongside gays and Jews); his solution to even confessing the attraction is exile from society.
Notice how he links in your mind the images of those who oppose pedophilia with the Nazis and the “Old Testament” (similarly frightening in Liberal-ese). Notice also how now the “sex offender” (he has already blurred the “pedophile” image in your mind with that phrase) is just like the disabled and the Jews, who were once wrongly persecuted by “Nazis.”
Liberals speak this language of vague images (and the emotions they elicit) fluently. Their rhetoric is all about established emotional images, which are linked by associations to what they want you to like, and what they don’t want you to like.
It isn’t conscious. They want to feel good about Bill Clinton, and they will look for feel-good images to use in analogies, metaphors, and other associations to try and walk like-thinking people to their emotional perceptions. “Bill Clinton’s election was like JFK’s Camelot all over again.”
They aren’t saying it is like that logically. They are walking the listener toward a feeling which feels good to them, in the hopes that other people will begin repeating the meme and producing the feeling in them. Vox is like Hitler, Obama is like the Messiah, health care is like a human right, and so on. These are emotional feelings they are speaking in, in the hopes everyone will begin passing these emoti-memes around, and they can begin to enjoy them too. Their ideal dialog would be like a blackboard on which someone wrote “Vox is evil” one hundred times. They would be in emotional bliss.
Use logic to refute their analogy, and you might as well speak in ancient Aramaic. Figure out a painful image, and throw an analogy at them which makes use of it, and they will recoil – and you might even force them to change their mind. Trigger them, by making analogies that play on insecurities and triggers, and you can make them retreat from the discussion entirely.
Trump speaks this language fluently, and it is drawing in the mushy middle who knows nothing about the issues, but knows Trump’s ideas feel right in some way they can’t describe. Neither Cruz, the logical genius, or Carson, the brilliant nice guy are fluent in that language yet, so they have fallen behind for now among the “feeling voters.”
We need to learn this language too, as do all our candidates.
[…] By Anonymous Conservative […]
Well. Fight fire with fire… Emotional rhetoric, with emotional rhetoric, we have the evolutionary moral high ground where we can’t be assailed. Mandatory castration of all pedos is NATURAL LAW.
I believe mandatory chemical castration is the only evolutionary moral footpath forward. This can be spread via our networks, even more potent is our word of mouth, be it a small business, a churchianity church, or social groups. Our message will spread to all our interconnected in-groups in many forms as to make it palatable for all our closest out-groups. To the point all the out-groups and in-groups of the right have been immunized, then radicalized against the normalization of pedos.
As for emotional rhetoric, our side has the emotional munitions to the hilt they just need to be used.
http://metro.co.uk/2015/09/29/mother-facing-jail-for-stabbing-paedophile-to-death-5411858/
The emotional triggers of justice above. Mix this with the revulsion of the insidious crimes of pedos, people will rise up to fight it the right way. It’s happening anyway, 3 yrs for uncontrollable emotional murder for a woman, 5 years on parole for a man. That’s a risk prevention method obviously going to come to the fore.
Hell where I live it’s normal and natural to have these creatures run out of town.
Reading the comments of the article is very telling.
Unless of course the politicians make it law for mandatory chemical castration of pedos, we will have more uncontrollable emotionally and genetically driven murder of homosexual and heterosexual pedophiles. It’s evolutionary adaptive to eliminate the dangers posed to our children. We just can’t help ourselves to protect our children, just as homosexuals can’t help there genetically inherited orientation.
This is why the liberal fags or gamma’s as you call them are trying to air brush the pedos…
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/1997/07/the_unkindest_cut.html
I’d say it’s the kindest cut, in a society with resources… As you say K selection…
Bring on ragnarok.