Rabbits Are Incapable Of Love For One Another

Trump: A Geometry of Emotions
We are sending the enclosed material out to the Psychology Departments of all the universities in America. Its relevance to Trump is seen in Section 5 on Slavery in the attachment. Fairness in this very tight race demands you give the reasons cited why scientists should support Trump some exposure.

Dear Colleague,

Physical illness or abnormal physiology was severely limited in its understanding and treatment prior to science’s clarification of normal physiology. It should not be surprising, then, that mental illness or abnormal emotion and the behavior that flows from it would also be limited in its understanding and treatment given the inadequate picture we currently have of the normal emotions that people experience and use in their everyday lives.

Of course, most psychological professionals now (as with most medieval medical practitioners back then) will object vigorously to this slight and slur on the helping occupation they have devoted their lives to. But please don’t be offended. An illustration, indeed one that has some relevance to this year’s raucous presidential election, will make the point without hurting anybody’s feelings.

It is well known by psychologists and by politicians that “iffy” endeavors are best entered into with low-expectation in order to minimize disappointment if the effort fails and maximize the elation and sense of value of success when that is the outcome. But there is no theory for why this happens, no “proof” of this precept other than the hard fact of it gotten from repeated introspective observations. The Geometry of Emotion provides an underlying theoretical framework for it and for a wide range of other universal cognitive relationships, normal and abnormal, using mathematics that even severely math compromised psycho-professionals can understand assuming that every PhD and MD in the field got a B or better in simple algebra on the road to getting the high blown tags that now decorate their names. We cut to the chase quantitatively in the matter without further introduction on the attachment.

Ruth Marion Graf with Peter V. Calabria, PhD (biophysics)

Meh. In an r-selected world, he could always find a younger, hotter wife.

I like the idea of asking everyone “What should be the penalty for murder?” Answers may be anything from a single word to a ten-page essay, all signed and archived in an official registry. When someone is convicted of murder, pull the perp’s and the victim’s answers (or their parents’ answers in the case of minors), and apply whichever one is more severe.

For example, the Norwegian Labor Party passed a law that no one shall be put to death, nor imprisoned for more than twenty-one years for any reason. So when Anders Behring Breivik massacred 77 of their children, he got twenty-one years!

(Stating the bleedin’ obvious!)

His “rational” was completely different to a native criminal!

He feared deportation!

Give me strength.