r-strategists And Migrants Are The Same

I was reading this article:

When Muslims are in the minority, they complain about being oppressed. But the minute they become the majority, they become real oppressors because of the inherent intolerance of their culture. Nowhere is this more evident than in many parts of Birmingham, England…

When Muslims are admitted in large numbers, the idea of “vetting” them becomes useless; in numbers this large, they take over society and make it their own. They come fleeing a failing culture and then promptly impose that culture on their new home when their numbers become large enough. Their new territories become no-go zones for non-Muslims, and they effectively become self-governing with sharia law.

Notice the similarities to leftism. Leftists take a beautiful state like California, screw it up, and then migrate to new areas that are completely unlike where they came from. As they land in their new homes, they encourage other leftists to make the move as well, to swell their numbers and allow them to take control. Yet the minute they gain control, they set about trying to turn their new home into the exact same fucked-up, big government dystopia that they had just fled.

Third world migrants will now do the exact same thing in Europe. They are fleeing war-torn hell holes ruled by the most savage rulers that can be found, and arriving in civilized nations which they will promptly turn into the exact same messes as the homelands they fled. As they do this, the European r-strategists see something similar in them, and try to encourage their importation and their exercise of voting rights to help speed up the slide.

The similarity they see is that they are both r-strategists. As r-strategists, both have the same general perception that resources should be free, mating should be non-monogamous and bet-spreading, and that the enemy is the K-strategist who just wants to be left alone to sort their own affairs – and maybe secure a superior level of resource availability for themselves through free competition.

Spread r/K Theory, because our societies need to become more K-selective

This entry was posted in Cuckservatives, Europe, Immigration, ITZ, Liberals, Migrant Crime Deniers, Muslims, Politics, Psychology, rabbitry. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
7 years ago

[…] r-strategists And Migrants Are The Same […]

Pitcrew
Pitcrew
7 years ago

It’s interesting- if Merkel or a socialist win the coming election in Germany they will have about 20 months until foreign born individuals make up a majority of the age 20-35 population bracket. It’s likely that K strategists were already outnumbered in that age bracket, before the migrant crisis. Within a few years Oktoberfest will be outlawed, the Bundeswehr will be Islamicized and by 2030 Germany will likely become part of a Caliphate that includes Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Sweden- among others. I would watch to see if Brussels bureaucrats are training muslim nuclear reactor techs, or facilitating conversion for current ones in Germany and Sweden.

Jolly Jaded Jurist
Jolly Jaded Jurist
7 years ago

1000 words:comment image

disenchantedscholar
7 years ago

Peace makes them uncomfortable because conservatives are happy (not in mortal peril).

John Calabro
John Calabro
7 years ago

Hey Anonymous, I have a question on K migration, what pressures causes a K or groups of K to leave their homeland? I know you have said in the past most migrates are r’s but I have been thinking on this question because for K genes to survive there would be causes were protecting one’s family and keeping one’s traditions alive is more important then staying to fight for a dying civilization.

I think say if I was living in Germany right now (or anytime in 2016) that I would look to move to a more K like environment. Especially if I had children to bring them to a civilization like Hungry, Poland or Russia. This would be hard for me to leave my home country and even harder to a place that does not speak the same language but keeping your family history alive is more important. Some K might even move due to working in the military. Developed in another country and married an native, stay there and have a family. There are cases of many British solders doing this in the past with and Americans today doing this in bases around the world.
I guess in the past a civilization that was more K would take over other civilizations that were more r (I think Romans taking over say ancient Greek cities), the conquering force would then breed with the natives thus spreading K. This might be why even know a civilization like Rome or British empire fall another one rises and sometimes from former conquered areas. I think of the history of German, an area where French, British, Russian (and other) forces fought in for centuries. After the Napoleonic era you then get the most K civilization Prussia which later becomes Germany, while the older civilizations such as the French after losing many soldiers (often K) became more r. This can not be an accident can it? Is it maybe resources or a combination of many things.

John Calabro
John Calabro
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
7 years ago

Interesting idea. I would like something like what you said about moving to one place. I remember back in 2014 when I was with the Libertarian movement. They were trying to get most to move to New Hampshire, this was in part due to the low population, sea port, gun rights and live free or die motto. The guy that started it and got the movement started, i think would of been K. They thought if they got enough people their they could vote in more Liberty minded politicians in. The problem. I think i told you before but too many Libertarians who were r move, also many other people from New York coming into the state. Ones that want to have open border, higher taxes and more social programs and have no idea on the philosophy or understanding of Libertarianism or Austrians economics.

Dave
Dave
7 years ago

What do Muslims do when there are no non-Muslims left to mooch off of? They raise herds of goats or camels, drink their milk, eat their meat, and sew tents out of their hides. The animals roam freely, devouring everything, not even leaving roots for plants to grow back from. As Sir Claude Jarvis noted, Arabs are not the sons of the desert but its father, for it was their abuse and neglect that turned the “Fertile Crescent” into a barren wasteland.

Arabs and Negroes do not build barns and stockpile fodder, nor could they, as they lack the necessary concepts of providence and property rights, so their chances of surviving even a one-month winter are slim. As one character realized early in the movie “28 Days Later”, rage-zombies don’t plant crops or raise livestock, so we just need to stay alive and uninfected until they all starve to death.

When the money runs out, Northern Europe will become fully white again or revert to wilderness, as large swathes of Eastern Europe already have.

Bear
Bear
7 years ago

They’ve done it in Vermont. A formerly very neighborly, very small govt. conservative state was swamped by losers from New Yawk and New Joissy. Many of them wealthy heirs of trust funds. In no time at all the state was transformed into the Kalifornia of the East Coast. Its nearly unrecognizable- the worst of it having happened within the last 25 years. Now these same rabbits are itching to bring in boatloads of vibrant to foul up the state even worse.