r-strategist Instincts Are A Short Term Strategy

Case in point:

Feminists in Stockholm are leaving areas like the notorious migrant-heavy no-go zones of Husby and Tensta because they say religious fundamentalists now rule those suburbs.

Nalin Pekgul is a self-described feminist and former member of parliament for the left wing Swedish Social Democrats. For over 30 years, she lived in the Stockholm suburb of Tensta but says that she no longer feels safe there. She claims Muslim fundamentalists have taken over and she doesn’t feel she can visit the centre of Tensta without being harassed, Swedish broadcaster SVT reports.

According to Ms. Pekgul, the situation for women in public life in the area has deteriorated over the past several years. She noted that there has been a rise in religious fundamentalism amongst the men in the area, many of whom come from migrant backgrounds. Pekgul attempted to combat the trend by organising coffee shop meetings but soon abandoned the idea.

r-strategist urges are designed to confer advantage under the specific circumstances that provoked them. But they are not forward looking, or designed to produce beneficial circumstances in the future. The r-strategy is designed as a short-term strategy to exploit immediate circumstances. It is not about operating with an eye to the future.

This creates amusing stories like the above. r-strategists import foreigners because they think the foreigners will keep domestic K-strategists occupied and unable to compete with the r-strategists. It is an impulsive instinct, not a logical strategy. There is no thought involved. They want it, they do it. When it produces destruction, the r-strategist simply triggers instinct number two – flee to safer areas with less conflict. Where they land, they will see lots of homogenous K-strategists around them, and that will trigger the instinct to import more foreigner savages again, to weaken the happy K’s who live there. Once there are too many foreigners you will be back to triggering instinct two, and they will flee again.

It sounds crazy, stupid, and illogical. But bear in mind how weak and pathetic the r-strategists are. Here is one who wrote a children’s book about how Santa is actually a gay man shacked up with a fay black-lover (also white-bearded), who fills in for him sometimes at malls:

That guy shouldn’t be able to survive in any environment. But if he successively imports hostiles to keep the natives occupied, and then flees and repeats the process when his instincts tell him to, it is a viable strategy to save his own ass. It is a short term strategy, he needs to keep it up indefinitely, and he will literally lay waste to every last vestige of the greatness of Western Civilization leaving a swath of civilizational destruction in his wake. This one pissant will destroy nuclear-armed nations and ultimately kill millions.

But what choice does he have? Every other option ends with him running down a street into a dead end alleyway, and the crowd filling the alley behind him, before he dies a horrible death.

Imagine what you would do to him yourself, and then multiply it by a hundred villagers with torches, pitchforks, and absolutely no governing authority to hold them back. And yet he lives. Obviously his strategy, as stupid and illogical as it is, is quite impressive if for no other reason than his type survives in our species and he specifically continues to breath air.

The key to the destruction of the r-strategy is that it is illogical. They are the locusts, swarming over civilization and destroying all the civility. When the locusts exhaust their resources, they die en masse, and so will the liberals.

All we need is the Apocalypse, and our streets will be littered with Pajama-boy bodies. ITZ coming.

Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because dead Pajama boys will be very satisfying