Q is going again. The format for Q’s posts will be a screenshot image of Q’s post, and immediately below each post will be any links reprinted as text hyperlinks so you can click them, and then my comments in bold. As always, you can see Q’s posts aggregated live, and new ones which may have gone live after our print deadline at http://www.qanon.pub
___________________________________
https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1308723356611555328
Not sure what this means. The most likely explanation is that political spying, as bad as it was, is only 1% of a scandal involving child sexual abuse, ritual murder, and worse. Or political spying only happens to 1% of the population, and the rest of the spying on people is non-political, or just bored monitors turning their tech on other nearby people to see if they can find something interesting/voyeuristic to occupy themselves. Obviously if Operation TIPS was going to draw in 4% of the population and citizen informants/spies, and that looks like the lower estimate of about what those of us who see it see, then it would seem a huge scandal, and more than 1% of the problem, but we will see what Q ultimately reveals.
https://nypost.com/2020/09/23/senate-report-links-hunter-biden-to-trafficking-ring/?
https://twitter.com/CBSThisMorning/status/1308740250429280259
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/22919
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/24651
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/30480
https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle/status/1308788330201583618
Spread r/K Theory, because sometimes the percent is based on perspective.
> Competing factions . . . . each with a horse in the race
It will be interesting if Q can persuade you that there is no One Global Organization Of Evil, but rather a gigantic distributed Cabal. It’s a subtle but extremely important point.
Also, it was interesting to see the Jesuits show up (blow up?) here in the comments. I’d be curious to see what some of you think of Swami Mukundananda’s videos – https://www.youtube.com/c/swamimukundananda
To me, everything he says is about Hinduism completely compatible with the New Testament, especially the Gospels, but directly opposite the violent Old Testament. Or you could say that it is compatible with the Torah but not the Talmud.
It is possible. But I think it a lower probability model, given the power of intelligence, and the fact that to get good intelligence you need a coordinated organization, with tech, assets, and operators, and the power to operate above the law in the US (or even control the law). I have seen one such organization and it is beyond massive, and it would be impossible to defeat it on it’s terms. If I were Cabal, (and even now, though I am not) it is in my shit to the point I cannot surprise it without a physical meeting under very specific circumstances. It literally has somebody watching my computer keystrokes right now. It is watching in my house via some means. It can move literally thousands of people on a moment’s notice in many, many places. I’ve shown you on google it is even in backwoods Alaska at every intersection the google car hits.
That is nearly impossible to meet and compete with on the terms that such an operation, trying to compete with it, will meet it. Hillary, for example, cannot create a competing intelligence operation like this, with this power. Thus she will not be able to compete with this, and will always be under its thumb, given this type of intel is imperative to operational dominance in that arena. Soros even, I am sure, has to operate daily with this thing watching him in his house, infiltrating people into his organizations, and getting ears on him and all his communications, on the fly. Epstein, has under the thumb of this thing. Russian intel, trying to do spook shit in the US, is completely observed 24/7, with every word recorded and every keystroke logged. Even terrorists like Mohammed Atta would have been under it.
Given the power this operation confers, it is the dominant force. If little cliques like Hillary’s are operating “autonomously,” are they really autonomous, if they know this thing (and whoever controls it) is the top dog, and they need to please it? Is she autonomous if the people running this thing have organized it to oversee such “autonomous” organizations, cow them with fear into subservience, and if it polices them and removes the ones which do not serve its purposes? Were the Sept 11th hijackers weren’t sent by this thing originally, were they autonomous, if this thing watched them, knew what was coming, calculated the attack was good for setting in motion things it wanted, and it allowed the attacks?
This is the key – intelligence is territorial, and aggregating. Over time it moves toward there being one massive operation, and given the importance of intel to this arena, that will tend to confer an all-powerful nature on whoever controls it. So whether there are cliques or there are not, there is one power who has control over all of them. If it does not exert that control openly, it is merely because it has organized things that way, probably to compartmentalize it’s subsidiaries and insulate itself from discovery. But it is still there, in full control, and the top of the pyriamid.
I have always been struck that the pyramid with the eye at the top of it symbolizes something which can see everything, without any obstruction blocking any view anywhere.
In truth if Q says it is like that, and there is no hierarchy with some family, or group overseeing everything, I would increase the probability Q has taken over that position and is reserving it for itself, more than I would accept there is no top-level hierarchy controlling this thing.
But as I have said, if Q plays out, and I am still under surveillance (and I will know), and if he does not reveal the extent of the domestic informant/spy network, and publicly take it down and educate the public on what it looks like and what its capabilities are, then yeah, nothing is changing, and I will be open about it, as I set about trying to take it down myself. This thing does not belong in America, and there is only one reason people are trying to protect it – it is giving them power over the citizens and allowing them to subvert the Constitution for personal power, at the expense of fellow Americans.
I don’t think Q is saying that there is not one single organization, he is just pointing to the internal divisions which are inevitable in any organization and which may actually be encouraged by those at the top to keep those lower down fighting eachother so that they are too weak to attempt to take over from those at the top.
Yep. Read the Wolf and the Sheep by Kelly Hoskins. He described this 30 years ago.
I’ve been looking at similar split models.
One Cabal To Rule Them All seems too hard to maintain. Internal divisions and general backstabbing would likely destroy it no matter how Byzantine its organizational structure. A looser collection makes more sense.
(And if One Cabal To Rule Them All is as powerful as it seems, how the hell did Trump get this far? How did they not kill him quietly before he even announced for 2016?)
The simplest explanation is that Cabal seems to have near-unlimited manpower because it’s not Cabal’s manpower at all. There’s likely a large pool of “surveillance hobbyists” out there who literally do that crap for twisted fun. Which of course means a large pool of easily blackmailed “helpers” who can be brought on board as needed by an inner ring Cabal.
I haven’t lurked long enough on your blog to know the full story, but I’ll guess that the surveillance harassment began shortly after you published your book. Someone “followed the money” from Amazon back to you and the “fun” started.
I must explain a bit here. This anon was in Anonymous until my branch of the hivemind was scattered in a series of attacks. I lost sync and my branch has yet to coalesce anew. But this anon still has the shards of knowledge I held for the hivemind, and one of them was a treatise on FBI surveillance techniques, originally published in the late 1990’s by some activist who went so far as to bait the FBI to surveil him. It described the common surveillance methods and the lengths the FBI would go.
It is certain that actors other than Anonymous also have copies of that treatise and are able to mimic FBI surveillance techniques. This creates a large pool of factions that practice similar surveillance for their own individual purposes.
That treatise also accused the FBI of acting as a political police. If true, that would be a motivation for elements of the FBI to take interest in you after you published your book and to “follow the money” back to you from your book on Amazon. But there are other possibilities too, such as a rabbit in Amazon tipping off some friends. Your observed harassment requires some directing force. FBI? Antifa? International Jewish Conspiracy? Masons? Little Green Men? No idea who but Amazon is a near-certain initial compromise.
That treatise also contained “calls to action” that any anon would instantly recognize as honeypot v&bait. It’s possible that the FBI published their own surveillance techniques to acquire plausible deniability in using them more widely.
Your logical ability is strong, and I would have agreed with you before this. But this experience revealed things to me which you can’t get just off good logical analysis, and it is these experiences which produced by differing opinion.
The treatise you describe was Lee Adam’s old Spy/counterspy pieces. Very good, but that is not what I am talking about. I am talking about a coordinated, national network of regular citizens, recruited into an informant network, and gifted with technology I would bet even FBI Counter-intelligence would not believe is deployed on regular citizens. Honestly, a twelve man mobile surveillance team is almost laughable by comparison.
Second, I would have assumed the split model was smarter, except for my experiences with this machine, and my witnessing the power of the tech, and the extent of their network, and what it can do. Literally, they can hear everything said in a structure remotely, and follow everything you do with technology like computers, and if they don’t like what they see, they will wake you in the middle of the night with some sort of vibration-weapon, which makes your body vibrate, and which degrades you physically and mentally. And I assume they have worse, if you become enough of a threat. If you are going to fight, you have to just not give a shit, and view your body as a disposable unit, and the principle as more important than your own well being. So given the weakness of the vast majority of the population, the idea there would be a competing operation they did not control seems a slim chance to me, unless it was Mil Intel, which could secure a base and go underground. I assume Trump was backed by that, and that is how he won.
As for tracking me, my initial assumption was they somehow tracked my internet, as Amazon doesn’t know anything about me, nor does my publisher, or my web host, or anyone in my real life. My Opsec was actually quite good.
But then I got thinking, and as I saw the indices of this thing, I realized I had seen these things, and felt these vibes, going back through grade school, to when I was a little kid. And then a parent was telling me stories about weird things they had seen, and I realized that parent was being followed around when they were a kid by this same civilian network. So there are two possibilities. Either everyone is under this thing, and it is distributed neighborhood by neighborhood, watching everyone, with some sort of archivist assigned to curate the files of everyone in their neighborhood, and I and my parent just happened to see it. Or that parent got some extra-coverage, and was followed, and it got transferred to me, and they were watching as the book took form. At some point, somebody saw the book, probably in Obama’s operation, and ordered the author pushed, and this came out into the open and pushed.
I can’t say whether my parent was special, or whether they just saw what is on everyone, both seem equally probable from what I see, but I expect to find out someday.
Is Cabal a feudal structure?
Maybe… Tough to say without first finding out who exactly is at the top.
Yes, that seems to be it, now that you mention the name, but there was more than just mobile surveillance teams in the treatise this anon read. It’s possible that unknown other parties have expanded the treatise while passing it along in the meantime and we’ve seen different versions.
This anon has considered your post and thought about it and thought about it and I have to be very careful here to say only what our enemies (Chris Hanson Be Upon Them) already know.
Another commenter previously suggested that Cabal cannot communicate openly, which fits very well with an inner ring able to blackmail or otherwise coerce parts of a larger outer pool at will but not able to continuously manage all of them.
It looks like you’ve inherited an unusual target status. Perhaps your family was simply conveniently close to an Inner Ring Cabal cell. Perhaps there was some other reason.
Very few anons have reported anything like you describe, but a few rare reports have existed. Reports of “interesting” surveillance haven’t correlated to actual Anonymous activities either. This suggests that Cabal can put a limited number of targets very firmly under the microscope, but can’t manage a larger target pool and either isn’t interested or can’t find most of Anonymous. Given some of the activities told of in Anonymous lore, lack of interest seems unlikely.
If Cabal has the technology you describe, there’s no point in actual observable surveillance except as a form of harassment. It’s also possible you were gaslighted into seeing innocent activities as ongoing surveillance harassment. That would be far more cost-effective than actual ongoing operations and would align with someone in Obama’s operation setting out to “get you” for writing your book. A much smaller amount of actual ongoing harassment would serve to keep the target gaslighted.
Anonymous lore tells of a few stunningly lulzy victories, where our targets were driven completely insane, not that the $cientologi$t leaders needed much pushing in that direction. Anonymous is familiar with the concept of gaslighting but was never able to intentionally attempt it. Despite all the posturing, anons do have consciences. A Cabal with blackmail on its operatives would have no such restrictions and could make gaslighting a routine exercise, likely as part of efforts to discredit their targets.
There was a guy who did an interview, saying he worked for a contractor who did the gaslighting, and he said he never found out where the names came from, but every one was a unique thinker who didn’t follow the models everyone else was raised into, but rather did their own thing. That kind of fits me too, to a T. I would think it was that, except for it being on my family line.
But I will say, it is more massive than you would think possible, and that is not all gaslighting. I have no doubt everybody will get a very high level of coverage, at least for a small period, to add firsthand observations to their files from their neighborhood curators. And if you were anonymous, I guarantee you, you had a high level of coverage, and tech deployed around you like you wouldn’t believe possible.
It is out there, and my impression is, more often than not, it is bored out of its mind, so deploying on you would be common sense.
At some point, I will be finding out what is up with this. No way do I go to my grave with this itch unscratched.
I click the “Reply” button, it says “Leave a Reply to Anonymous Conservative” above the box, and the post appears at the top anyway.
If they were after Anonymous generally, we would have expected the anons who had public and open affiliation with Anonymous to have drawn more surveillance, but this wasn’t the pattern.
Every one of the reports of “interesting” surveillance caused all anons to be on the lookout for similar antics, but if Cabal was watching Anonymous, they were real careful never to use similar techniques on any two anons. We never had confirmations with other anons being similarly observed.
I lost sync some time ago, but this anon can still say that Anonymous wishes you good fortune in finding the truth.
It can be very stealthy, so maybe it judged you guys too much of a threat, and stayed back and in the shadows. If your neighbor just monitors the tech from his basement, you’ll never notice.
Thank you for the well wishes though, and I wish you well back.