Q-anon’s Posts – 09/24/2020

Headline Brief is here.

Twitter Brief is here.

Q is going again. The format for Q’s posts will be a screenshot image of Q’s post, and immediately below each post will be any links reprinted as text hyperlinks so you can click them, and then my comments in bold. As always, you can see Q’s posts aggregated live, and new ones which may have gone live after our print deadline at http://www.qanon.pub

___________________________________

https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1308723356611555328

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-unveils-proposed-section-230-legislation-behalf-administration

 

Not sure what this means. The most likely explanation is that political spying, as bad as it was, is only 1% of a scandal involving child sexual abuse, ritual murder, and worse. Or political spying only happens to 1% of the population, and the rest of the spying on people is non-political, or just bored monitors turning their tech on other nearby people to see if they can find something interesting/voyeuristic to occupy themselves. Obviously if Operation TIPS was going to draw in 4% of the population and citizen informants/spies, and that looks like the lower estimate of about what those of us who see it see, then it would seem a huge scandal, and more than 1% of the problem, but we will see what Q ultimately reveals.

 

https://nypost.com/2020/09/23/senate-report-links-hunter-biden-to-trafficking-ring/?

https://twitter.com/CBSThisMorning/status/1308740250429280259

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/22919

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/24651

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/30480

 

 

https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle/status/1308788330201583618

 

Spread r/K Theory, because sometimes the percent is based on perspective.

This entry was posted in News Briefs, Q. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
4 years ago

> Competing factions . . . . each with a horse in the race

It will be interesting if Q can persuade you that there is no One Global Organization Of Evil, but rather a gigantic distributed Cabal. It’s a subtle but extremely important point.

Also, it was interesting to see the Jesuits show up (blow up?) here in the comments. I’d be curious to see what some of you think of Swami Mukundananda’s videos – https://www.youtube.com/c/swamimukundananda

To me, everything he says is about Hinduism completely compatible with the New Testament, especially the Gospels, but directly opposite the violent Old Testament. Or you could say that it is compatible with the Torah but not the Talmud.

Farcesensitive
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
4 years ago

I don’t think Q is saying that there is not one single organization, he is just pointing to the internal divisions which are inevitable in any organization and which may actually be encouraged by those at the top to keep those lower down fighting eachother so that they are too weak to attempt to take over from those at the top.

Mycroft Jones
Mycroft Jones
Reply to  Farcesensitive
4 years ago

Yep. Read the Wolf and the Sheep by Kelly Hoskins. He described this 30 years ago.

Anonymous
Anonymous
4 years ago

I’ve been looking at similar split models.

One Cabal To Rule Them All seems too hard to maintain. Internal divisions and general backstabbing would likely destroy it no matter how Byzantine its organizational structure. A looser collection makes more sense.

(And if One Cabal To Rule Them All is as powerful as it seems, how the hell did Trump get this far? How did they not kill him quietly before he even announced for 2016?)

The simplest explanation is that Cabal seems to have near-unlimited manpower because it’s not Cabal’s manpower at all. There’s likely a large pool of “surveillance hobbyists” out there who literally do that crap for twisted fun. Which of course means a large pool of easily blackmailed “helpers” who can be brought on board as needed by an inner ring Cabal.

I haven’t lurked long enough on your blog to know the full story, but I’ll guess that the surveillance harassment began shortly after you published your book. Someone “followed the money” from Amazon back to you and the “fun” started.

I must explain a bit here. This anon was in Anonymous until my branch of the hivemind was scattered in a series of attacks. I lost sync and my branch has yet to coalesce anew. But this anon still has the shards of knowledge I held for the hivemind, and one of them was a treatise on FBI surveillance techniques, originally published in the late 1990’s by some activist who went so far as to bait the FBI to surveil him. It described the common surveillance methods and the lengths the FBI would go.

It is certain that actors other than Anonymous also have copies of that treatise and are able to mimic FBI surveillance techniques. This creates a large pool of factions that practice similar surveillance for their own individual purposes.

That treatise also accused the FBI of acting as a political police. If true, that would be a motivation for elements of the FBI to take interest in you after you published your book and to “follow the money” back to you from your book on Amazon. But there are other possibilities too, such as a rabbit in Amazon tipping off some friends. Your observed harassment requires some directing force. FBI? Antifa? International Jewish Conspiracy? Masons? Little Green Men? No idea who but Amazon is a near-certain initial compromise.

That treatise also contained “calls to action” that any anon would instantly recognize as honeypot v&bait. It’s possible that the FBI published their own surveillance techniques to acquire plausible deniability in using them more widely.

map
map
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
4 years ago

Is Cabal a feudal structure?

Anonymous
Anonymous
4 years ago

Yes, that seems to be it, now that you mention the name, but there was more than just mobile surveillance teams in the treatise this anon read. It’s possible that unknown other parties have expanded the treatise while passing it along in the meantime and we’ve seen different versions.

This anon has considered your post and thought about it and thought about it and I have to be very careful here to say only what our enemies (Chris Hanson Be Upon Them) already know.

Another commenter previously suggested that Cabal cannot communicate openly, which fits very well with an inner ring able to blackmail or otherwise coerce parts of a larger outer pool at will but not able to continuously manage all of them.

It looks like you’ve inherited an unusual target status. Perhaps your family was simply conveniently close to an Inner Ring Cabal cell. Perhaps there was some other reason.

Very few anons have reported anything like you describe, but a few rare reports have existed. Reports of “interesting” surveillance haven’t correlated to actual Anonymous activities either. This suggests that Cabal can put a limited number of targets very firmly under the microscope, but can’t manage a larger target pool and either isn’t interested or can’t find most of Anonymous. Given some of the activities told of in Anonymous lore, lack of interest seems unlikely.

If Cabal has the technology you describe, there’s no point in actual observable surveillance except as a form of harassment. It’s also possible you were gaslighted into seeing innocent activities as ongoing surveillance harassment. That would be far more cost-effective than actual ongoing operations and would align with someone in Obama’s operation setting out to “get you” for writing your book. A much smaller amount of actual ongoing harassment would serve to keep the target gaslighted.

Anonymous lore tells of a few stunningly lulzy victories, where our targets were driven completely insane, not that the $cientologi$t leaders needed much pushing in that direction. Anonymous is familiar with the concept of gaslighting but was never able to intentionally attempt it. Despite all the posturing, anons do have consciences. A Cabal with blackmail on its operatives would have no such restrictions and could make gaslighting a routine exercise, likely as part of efforts to discredit their targets.

Anonymous
Anonymous
4 years ago

I click the “Reply” button, it says “Leave a Reply to Anonymous Conservative” above the box, and the post appears at the top anyway.

If they were after Anonymous generally, we would have expected the anons who had public and open affiliation with Anonymous to have drawn more surveillance, but this wasn’t the pattern.

Every one of the reports of “interesting” surveillance caused all anons to be on the lookout for similar antics, but if Cabal was watching Anonymous, they were real careful never to use similar techniques on any two anons. We never had confirmations with other anons being similarly observed.

I lost sync some time ago, but this anon can still say that Anonymous wishes you good fortune in finding the truth.