Pedophile Ring Reporter Found Dead

The Soviets had something similar.

“In 1975 during a U.S. Senate testimony on rogue activities of the CIA, it was revealed that the CIA had a heart attack weapon.”

http://www.military.com/video/guns/pistols/cias-secret-heart-attack-gun/2555371072001

As I have a general interest in how ruling works, I also have an interest in all matters intelligence.

A few points I think I can publicly share here:

Intelligence agencies have regular need to blackmail targets.
In the past, true or alleged sexual infidelity and homosexuality were extensively exploited to that end. Both lost the powerful taboo status they had in the past, and have become largely useless today for that end.

Not so pedophilia. Even the mere public accusation, let alone (true or manufactured) proof – can end careers, families and people.
Pedophilia is also nicely “manufacturable” – a extortion target can be made into a “pedophile” even if he is not one, actually – by planting evidence. It is almost trivially easy for the agencies to plant evidence in your computer, storage or communication devices, “proving” that you are a pedophile.
Through this, an almost universal blackmail tool – accusation and “proof” of pedophilia – can be used to attack, that is, blackmail, that is, “remote control” people.
But this is kind of the last “terrible taboo” – most other things became useless to this end by liberalization of society.
Therefore, I think that this tool, this weapon, will be kept “sharp” – by perpetuating the pedophilia taboo deliberately.

Even in (higher-class) regular” police work this is exploited:
Consider strong encryption. Police hates it, because they cannot break it (perhaps the true elite agencies like NSA can, but even if this were true, such a powerful ability would not be wasted by making it known by use for lowly police work).
What do high-hierarchy police officers to break encryption?
They “investigate”, that is, inform the suspect that his encrypted device is “reasonable suspicion” that he is a pedophile trying to keep his pedophile-pictures evidence from the police (even if they know is his not a pedophile as well as having no such pictures on the encrypted device) – and will therefore, have to ask, “investigate”, all his social contacts if they would know or have heard anything about him being a pedophile or having such pictures. This, of course, while being a mere, “harmless” question by police, legally, would destroy the social reputation of the suspect, effectively “making” him a pedophile, gossip and his inability to prove himself innocent assure this. Therefore, a tremendous pressure is put on the suspect, greatly increasing the odds he will give the police his passwords.

Pedophilia is also used for national security.
Do welcome intelligence agencies to abduct children for rape or even murder by pedophiles?
That would be impossible and evil, you think?
What if the true question is not sacrifice children or not, but sacrificing a few children vs. the death of millions of people?
Why? How?
Consider powerful people of enemy countries which hold military secrets.
They are usually rich, they usually are difficult to bribe, because they mostly already have
everything money can buy.
Therefore, they are bribed with thing money cannot easily buy.
Basically, the ability to rape and murder (if they have such desires) children at will.
The intelligence agencies deliver everything needed, and the enemy country’s high-ranking official pays with military secrets, say, nuclear codes or technical details of such sort, which would enable the country that delivers him the children, would be effectively safe from attack.
The trade is a few children for the survival of millions in the case of war.
Now, this is morally not anymore so trivial to decide, isn’t it?
How about trade or patent or technology secrets? They can make millions of people poor or well-off in good jobs – realistically, what are the lives of a few children worth compared to the economic well-being of millions of people, or just a corporation with ten-thousands or hundred-thousands of employees who are either kept and have income, or would have to be fired?
Maybe you should be happy you do not have to decide and be responsible for such decisions,
because they are real and must be made, by someone.
This, too, is one of the function of ruling, one of the things the real upper class deals with.

Let me also say generally, that it is not any longer possible for most people to even know that they
are attacked by the agencies, because available technologies, means and methods, have grown and evolved to such a degree that the intelligence agencies (at least at top level) are almost (more or less) all-powerful.
It’s easy to figure out you are under attack if you are shot at, find a knife in your back or a bomb under your car – crude, silly things from the past, Movie circus material.
What if you find yourself having a heart attack, stroke or cancer?
Is this just bad luck, natural causes, or a deliberate attack, for example by people who, in refined form, for example exploit the drugs used in animal experiments (apes, rats, mice) to induce such illness as a model organism to research cures, against the other mammal – humans – which functions identically biologically?
Is this car accident that killed that guy an accident, or did the electronics of his car make him
crashing into this wall? Natural accident, suicide, assassination?
When the difference in technical ability and insight between intelligence agencies and “official” police and regular individuals becomes great enough, said agencies can basically murder at will, for example.
Generally, even today, we have lost not only any means to defend ourselves from such,
but even the ability to notice that we are deliberately under attack.

Also, consider that, with the advance of technology, physical murder is not even necessary anymore. Erasing the memory of someone, for example by forced electroconvulsive shock treatment (running electrical current through a brain long enough until all the memories are erased and the human is reduced to, kind of, baby-like state), then making it look like a heavy stroke, is already possible with publicly available knowledge and means. This achieves what physical murder did in the past – getting someone out of the picture – without actually “murdering” him, that is, avoid potential public outrage and legal problems associated with “primitive” murder.

Also, concerning pedophilia, I think that at least some of the rich and powerful, after enjoying being rich and powerful for decades, lose the enjoyment of this state. They desire more, something even more exclusive. Sex with children is perhaps one of the “finer things” some of the upper class enjoy, mostly because they can and it is one of the last things that feels special to them, to feel again that they are better, more powerful than other people.
This, of course, opens a lot of potential for inner-upper-class conflict and blackmail, given the state of technology, for example regarding miniature cameras.
I also think it instructive to mention the Belgian child abuse scandal of Marc Dutroux – by accident it became public – he delivered children for sex to well-paying members of the Belgian upper class – military, politicians, judges etc. – and then there were around 30 deaths of witnesses, car crashes, suicides (including a found hanged government attorney); even evidence was stolen from a police station, by anonymous attackers assaulting the station with automatic weapons, killing everybody inside, breaking the evidence vault with military explosives, and then vanishing. All this was so much and clearly beyond suspicion, that hundreds of thousands of Belgians demonstrated in the streets against the way the investigation went and against their proven-corrupt, proven-pedophile, upper class.