Straight from the taxpayer’s pocket, no strings attached:
The migrant, known only as Ghazia A, fled Syria last year along with his family.
He has since resettled in Germany with his four wives and 22 of his children…
The family could be receiving more than £320,000 a year in benefits…
Mr Ghazia expressed an interest in working again but noted his commitments to his family made this difficult.
This can only happen when resources are free, in a way that is really unnatural.
This is the rabbit’s strategy. They are screwing the successful competitors, importing losers who they think will always be societally inferior, and by extension trying to raise their own social status.
We should ask the rabbits if they are afraid of importing intelligent migrants from first world nations because they are afraid those migrants would out-shine them, being smarter and more capable. We should ask them if they are favoring third world migrants because the migrants are so inferior, so low-IQ, and so incapable that they are the one screw-up, who the liberal is not afraid will be more capable than them. If you could make the importation of third world migrants a sign of selfishness, cowardice, and insecurity (all of which it is), then rabbits would be shamed into not supporting it.
As the K-shift progresses, and competitive drives increase, that will happen naturally. But if you could attach those perceptions to the leftist drive to import third-worlders now, you might be able to push that along faster.
[…] One Syrian Refugee Gets A $390,000 Per Year Handout […]
I have to wonder if ever single German is reflecting on this at all every day going in to work…every time they are taxed…how much does it take before the “makers” get fed up and tell the “takers” to piss off?
OFF TOPIC… AC you can choose to mull, use, or allow it to be viewed by all. I don’t care, but I found this interesting.
“Just Facts, in 2009, the Pentagon estimated that 65 percent of 17- to 24-year-olds in the U.S. were unqualified for military service because of weak educational skills, poor physical fitness, illegal drug usage, medical conditions or criminal records. In January 2014, the commander of the U.S. Army Recruiting Command estimated this figure at 77.5 percent, and in June 2014, the Department of Defense estimated this figure at 71 percent ”
In rough numbers it could give us an indication of how many people in the 17 to 24 age group are r or K. Listening to voxday and Molyneux discuss r/K from a recent yuotube, they say one defining characteristic of r/K is the ability to plan for the future. To see things coming, etc. Weak educational skills, etc show a lack of prep of the future. If 7 in 10 are considered unfit for the military for what are essentially r characteristics (week skills, poor physically, drugs, etc) it tells us that in that age group about 7 in 10 are r’s currently.
I maintain(absent hard data) that 1 in 10 on each end are hard r or hard K. These will always be r or K regardless of how adverse that is to them. That leave 8 in 10 that sway based on their life experience and their environment. Just some thoughts.
I think you are right, and I think the swaying factor is dopamine. I also think the new generation, having known the high technology from birth, is less swayed by it, and we will see them swing back K, assuming anti-gravity scooters, and teen space travel aren’t discovered in the near future.