Obama Administration Covers For Adolescent Muslim Gang Rapists

There is a reason for it. Progs want chaos. Communists want a revolution but the Progs are more akin to the Fabians. They want to set the world ablaze and then reforge it closer to their heart’s desire.

To find the reason you must always look past the surface; or what some might call, “first-level thinking.”

There are two main incontrovertible reasons and one possible reason for Hussein Obama’s actions.

The two incontrovertible reasons relate directly to Mr. Obama’s political ideals and position. This conclusion is supported by his past associations, his past statements, and his past actions. Firstly, the support and excusing of degenerate behavior is a direct tactic to destabilize and destroy the superior culture of the USA. Mr. Obama is a Marxist communist, we can debate what flavor-shots his coffee includes, but the main drink is not in question. Communist, “science,” predicted a social upheaval based upon class-consciousness and was stupendously and humiliatingly disproved when its prediction failed to arise in all but a destabilized society. The communists learned the only way a people would naturally come to communism is not through an evolution of superior thought and self-realization; but rather the same way any totalitarian dictator or government usurps power in a nation. That being parasiting off fears of a disinterested group of people who are not intent on protecting their society. A stable, successful, and patriotic society will not desire a new dictator curtailing their rights and stealing their wealth and will have the drive and intent to protect their lifestyle and resist the, “revolution.” However, a society of self-absorbed, narcissistic, uncaring people who believe their society is a deplorable thing devoid of good will welcome a, “champion,” who promises to take from their, “oppressors,” what, “really belongs to them.” The sexual revolution, homosexual acceptance, trans-movement, and now the push to normalize pedophilia is just one aspect of this tactic used to destabilize, discredit, and demean the society; and at the same time show how the communist’s destabilization disguised as the fault of the society is the natural outcome of the, “old and evil,” non-communist society; with the express intent of influencing even the moral and upstanding citizens to dislike where their society, “eventually leads,” which causes them to desire the revolution as well.

The second reason is more banal and direct. In order to support the continuation and accumulation of power; a political party must establish and entrench itself. Especially in times of drastic and unstable changes. The recent non-constitutionality of our leaders and courts and the impotence of the opposition to the communists is very precarious. So much of what has transpired in the past 8 years can be undone with no more effort or authority than the new president simply stating, “it’s all over we aren’t doing this anymore.” This is the need for the legislative process. If you want to undo a thing, you require equal or superior authority than the authority used to do it in the first place. If, as many situations in the past year include, the body doing a thing has no authority to do it in the first place, then no authority, legislative or otherwise, is necessary to undo or repeal it. Thus the Democrats are in a bind. Coupled with their innate desire for power an position, their continued attempts to undermine the constitution of the USA is in jeopardy, as there is no magic word able to silence the opposition to the power of a white (hetero)normal man as there is to a black man or really old woman; nor is there any inherent ability to use said tactics to bludgeon the heads of those who oppose the usurpation of power. In order to entrench their recent changes they need not only to retain their grip of power, but this grip must include a mechanism to avoid challenge. This is why, despite her absolute ineligibility and criminal background, Hillary is still being championed. Bernie would not have the same invulnerability the Democrats believe they have with Hillary. And without that invulnerability the recent non-constitutional actions and methods can be challenged without fear of being called, “racist,” or, “sexist.” Thus the election MUST go well for the Democrats, Hillary MUST win. In fact, Trump is one of the worst conditions for the Democrats, as his willingness to say what he wants (up till now anyways) bodes ill for their power plays since their tactics for entrenchment would not work against him or the people who rally under his personality. In order to facilitate this win, the public must be shielded from the failures of Democrat policy. For any evidence which supports or leads credence to the opposition’s position will do them great harm.

The third mentioned possible reason exists as a result of inferred evidence of facts. It is no way definitive, but it is not impossible either. This reason also adds an explanation to many of Hussein Obama’s actions and slides quite well into the principles of logical empiricism, especially those principles commonly referred as Ockham’s Razor. To put it simply, Hussein Obama’s recent and historical actions would be very well explained if Hussein were indeed a Shiite, and only Shiite, Muslim or at least considerably predisposed to act favorably in their interests. Multiple inferences suggest this at least a possibility. Hussein’s continued support to Shiite Muslim groups, namely aiding the Arab Spring led by the Shiite Muslim Brotherhood deposing a Sunni US ally, sending free top-secret military technology to the Muslim Brotherhood controlled Egypt, giving verbal comfort and aid to Shiite Iran in his first months of Presidency, defending Shiite Iran from possible Israel attacks by leaking top-secret information to Iran, directly removing sanctions and treaty limitations preventing Shiite Iran from developing nuclear weapons, destabilizing majority Sunni Iraq in contravention to every military and policy advisor of his cabinet, opposing the cooperating with US policy Sunni dictator Gadhafi resulting in Iranian control of the area, and his continuing opposition to Sunni President Abbas in Syria. Add in the reported assertions that Hussein Obama’s father was a Shiite Muslim by numerous Islamic television broadcast stations the evidence suggesting Mr. Obama may be, or is at least deferentially supporting, a Muslim is quite strong.

Regardless of the veracity of the last paragraph of evidence, the reasons for the Obama administration’s actions are quite clear. In order to support the continued destabilization of a superior culture the communists must marginalize the idea of perversion and avoid punishing people for it; and in order to entrench and stabilize their power base and alterations to US governance the Democrats must have another President immune to political challenge the Democrats must hide this event from the eyes of the US people. The threat of Islam is quite real, they are an enemy within our gates no doubt; however, the real threat is the laxation of our societal ideals and with it our ability to identify evil practices and morally reprehensible actions and persons. It is this reason the Communists are in a position of power to believe they can get away with such unjust and deplorable actions. It is also the reason for our failure to identify and stand ready to defeat the Islamic enemy who has sworn to kill us all.