In testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) director Admiral Mike Rogers joined the chorus of other U.S. law enforcement and intelligence officials who are using Russia to leverage their own agencies into having a wider role in U.S. elections. In a statement to the committee on May 9, Rogers positioned NSA to oversee a wider role in conducting surveillance over elections, not only in the United States, but in other countries, including France and Britain.
Great, then they can add our actual registered votes to our file, so when the next leftist like Obama takes over he can remove all political opposition quickly.
The clear answer is, go back to paper ballots and hand counts. If our elections are not important enough to put that effort in, we should just give up and let the Cucks and the leftists take over the dictatorship.
Do whatever you want to other countries, but never tell me we need the establishment elites to take control in the US to protect the citizens. Armed citizen America is probably a few hundred times as deadly as all of the US government put together. We can take care of ourselves.
The truth is those who can’t take care of themselves would leave the US far better off if they were killed by our enemies.
Spread r/K Theory, because there are still a couple of things they can’t add to your file
Yeah, voting machines are not and can not be made adequately secure. Paper ballots counted on site at least leave an audit trail. Personally, I’m in favor of scantron type ballots that can be counted by both machines and people.
[…] NSA Needs Full Access To American Voting System […]
I’ve got the voting machine business figured out. There’s a way to do this I thought of. First use regular paper to vote on. Long ballots could use multiple pages. Using regular paper means that anywhere there’s a copy machine ballots could be printed. Cheap. The voter colors in a square for his vote on each issue or candidate. There’s a 1/2 inch margin around the ballot. The voter scribbles, marks, adds numbers, draws pictures or what ever they want around the edges of the ballot. A picture is taken of the ballot. Pictures could be taken with cheap web cams. Image software reads the ballot and where they colored in a vote it tallys it. A computer does a hash of the photo of the ballot. (hash for example sha256) They don’t need to be special computers. They could use the local governments normal PC’s for voting. Remote voting could be done by providing the voter with a one time password to vote and a ballot in the mail. Once again cheap. Here’s where the scribble is important. The scribbles will all be different. A hash is just a long number mathematically derived from data. Like a fingerprint is to a human. In this case the hash of the picture with the scribbles being the individualist part. It’s used to verify that a block of data has not been tampered with using a smaller number. The voter writes the hash number at the bottom of the ballot and keeps the ballot on their person. After verifying that the vote is correct they hit enter and their vote is cast and instantly added to all the other votes. ALL pictures of ballots will be kept. They are saved with their HASH. You could go to your polling station web site and download the whole polling station pictures of ballots and add them up yourself. You could also, using your individual hash number, verify that your vote is included in that polling stations votes and that it is correct by pulling up the picture tied to your individual hash number. You have the actual ballot as a back up. All the polling stations would be the same and each one you could download and count yourself with software. The only glitch is that the number of ballots needs to be the same as actual qualified voters. That we’ll handle the same as now so in unmonitored districts there could still be cheating. It would end electronic cheating which is almost impossible to prove.
Good solution. Almost so good I would bet against it ever being employed in these times.