News Briefs – 12/17/2020

>>CIA itself says it cannot operate in much poorer countries because surveillance is on every street corner, loitering in parks, all over.
>This is just a normal healthy society in which neighbors are aware of what’s going on.

The article you are arguing with said specifically, Humint was being rendered a pointless pursuit today because things had changed from how it was, and what they saw today was not the normal healthy society of old, but rather official government surveillance deployed as I have said it is deployed. One Officer specifically said they are not followed, but rather are tracked as they walk from one static posted unit to another, all arrayed all over town, 24/7 so no matter where you walk, you cannot lose them, and you just keep walking from one to another. That was contrasted with the old days of espionage when such surveillance was deployed as small teams, on specific intel officers, who would then set about trying to lose their teams to meet with assets. The article said they can’t recruit or meet with sources in host countries anymore specifically because the surveillance environment is different today. The CIA even briefs agents to not alter their sexual behaviors by having more or less sex, because the enemy is listening and logging their sex sessions, and deviations can be a sign of surveillance awareness, and betray NOCs.

>I doubt that, and if it were true, you could easily test it with honeypots.

You are familiar with Van Eck Phreaking? And I am sure that is just one method, as I am not a specialist in that discipline. Again, the technology we have is at least twenty years behind, and they have poured resources into being able to observe/monitor from a distance while leaving no footprints.

>It is quite difficult to control kids, as Cathy O’Brien’s testimony demonstrates.

You will probably eventually see a video of the neighbor’s kid, with another surveillance kid, talking about running surveillance on me and the role they play. They are about eleven. And from what I see my area has a clique of about fifteen to twenty kids like that, who all know each other and what they are a part of, just in the one age group. They literally have what is in essence a surveillance kid explorer program nationally, where the kids are sent like a summer camp to get schooled up on how they are supposed to operate. They have and use everything, which is why I know this isn’t local or Federal LE. I once had one surveillance woman take a toddler, and from behind a corner, tell it to run out and past me, where it turned another corner and was picked up by another surveillance person. Technically, I assume they viewed it as having the kid running a foot follow from when it could barely create a full sentence. Another family involved in my coverage brings a down syndrome kid, though I am not sure if the kid is fully read in on what is going on. They have everything. I’ve seen a tranny, a 480 lb woman, a woman who could easily have been 99, a fat woman in a rascal scooter with oxygen tanks, and even a midget.

And again, I am not the only person who reports this. A lot of people in the US are seeing it.

> You will probably eventually see a video of the neighbor’s kid, with another surveillance kid, talking about running surveillance on me and the role they play. They are about eleven.

I would be careful about publishing images of minors.

I would have thought if you genuinely didn’t believe this type of thing could exist, because it would be so horrible, the shock that there is hard proof of some quasi-private/quasi-public intel network running children in a sort of Hitler Youth against other innocent children would have overwhelmed any worry about a video being released that would expose it. In short, I’d think you’d be more interested in exposing such a horrific crime against humanity within the US than protecting the rights of some individual involved in it, or even shielding me from any consequence from exposing it. The bottom line is I am probably on a path right now, whether I do anything or not, which will produce a substantially worse outcome than any consequence from posting a video of a minor. I’ve literally got a Stasi security force with unlimited funds raining energy of various kinds on my house, and unfortunately for me I am the kind of hardhead that the bigger the enemy I face, the more I feel I have to fight. Even where it is stupid I can’t control it.

> You are familiar with Van Eck Phreaking?

Of course. A Faraday cage is a standard countermeasure.

Yeah, but that wasn’t my point. My point was the computer is a three dimensional piece of matter and energy, the state and position of which is discernible through a lot more means than just the wire coming into the ethernet port. I remember a study which used a microphone attached to an AI which used the sound of typing combined with the statistics of character usage to identify the unique sound signature of each key on a keyboard, and turn the sound in the room into a running key log. And you’re nto going to run a program to detect that.

And they do weird shit. I remember the story of a Central American Embassy, where the CIA knew the Russians were running a giant 10’x10′ beam of energy through the building, and it was some form of unhealthful energy that could produce cancer. They decided the lives of the Embassy staff were not as important as not letting the Russians know they had detected the beam, so for years young girls who just wanted to serve their country were walking in and out of the beam each day, and they never told anyone. And truth be told, the Russians were never going to kill anyone practically, if they had burned that and officially complain to stop it. But it is all a game, and nothing like the Military, where you never leave anyone on the battlefield.

As I have said, I know it works that way because it was beyond experimentation, and to the point they’d run cars back and forth in front of my house, on my isolated road, revving the engines to tell me they didn’t like when I was writing shit about them here. I’m not trying to prove this anymore. People here know I give the best assessment I can, and I’ve said it is like this. If they are operating, just take the best countermeasures you can based on this intel.

Exactly. It is why I call it the Secret Society. They all know each other, they all gossip about their targets, and they know what they are doing would not please the rest of the population if it got out. But they are one-up on everyone else, and somebody higher up in government encourages it all to get the intel, offers it cover as needed from local PD and FBI/feds who take interest, and coordinates it down to what jobs the members take and get, and where they buy their houses to maximize the coverage efficiency.

It is really quite amazing, because it is like an unknown occupation by some anti-Constitutionalist movement, made up of guys like Strzok who get a laugh out of intruding on people’s private lives.

Agree 100%.

All I will say is, it is not easy. I thought that way, even a few months into dealing with this. If you think like a normal person, and you think other people are normal like you, that is natural. I got a good foundation in physics and wave theory, and even pretty high end physics from Relativity to Quantum Mechanics. I figured fucking up tech is easier than applying it. But it doesn’t work that way. You are facing an entity that has literally blown through trillions of dollars on professional labs with the most elite scientists who specialize in everything they use, from electromagnetic radiation to sound waves. They have been doing it for decades, in a constantly escalating game of one upsmanship with other countries’ experts, each producing tech, then countermeasures to the tech, then countermeasures to countermeasures, and so on.

By the time you end up under this in the US as a citizen today, the shit they are using on you, which is admittedly probably hand me downs from ten or twenty years ago, is beyond your ability to combat it. Just a decade or two back, it was probably beyond the capability of professional Russian spooks to detect and countermand. And you, as a novice are probably ten to forty generations behind those professional Russians a decade back.

I mainly point this out because I think it is legitimately pointless to try and compete on that ground. If you need to operate, forget securing your email or text messages, or phone calls, and simply write it down and show it to your compatriot in person. Develop and use one time pads. If they can dominate on tech (and they can) don’t use the tech and go old school. Because my own feeling is if you are going to operate, you need to assume they have eyes and ears in your house, and are on all your devices.

Acting like overcoming this is a simple matter isn’t IMO good for the movement.

>Not just you. Right-wing dissidents are targets. They have been for some time. So are journalists critical of elite Democrat figures. You are both.

There is no history of schizo or anything in my family, and she did not think she had this until she was quite elderly, and saw with me it was possible. She had seen all the strangeness and defaulted to every case being weird coincidence. The thing was there were so many it was straining, and that was why she asked me if I had ever seen the same coincidence, probably to reassure herself it happened to everyone and was just chance. Fuck, I never would have thought this possible until later in life, namely once I did r/K eight or ten years back. No r/K and I would have been just like you.

But I have three issues with the rest. One, my mom had zero political interest, and did not grow up wealthy nor was there any reason she would ever have any money or power. Her entire life she was little more than a high IQ drone, who went to work, came home, ate, tended to family stuff and went to work. Dad wasn’t different, though I have no story indicating he was followed as a kid. Now you seem to say I have this for being a dissident, but then you imply she is crazy and it is genetic with me. It is one or the other. I have this, or I don’t and I am crazy. It can’t be both.

The second issue is, once you see this thing it becomes obvious. I drive by parking lots for shopping centers I never go in, and I see their people on hot sunny days sitting in cars, with the car door wide open, one ass cheek on the drivers seat of their car, the other hanging off, and a leg propped up on the driver’s door. They have to wait there, and it is too hot to wait in the car, and I assume they don’t use AC because either their car is full of electronics, and they replaced the AC compressor with a second alternator, or they don’t want the engine running and drawing attention to them by sound. I Have turned off into neighborhoods where I would never go in as I am driving just to see, and if the roads are set up right so they can’t squirt out another exit, I will catch that neighborhood’s loitering vehicular unit jumping up and exiting the neighborhood by me. It is my belief every neighborhood has one car loitering, waiting for the observation post in that neighborhood, which is listening to all the pole mics, to say, “Somebody exited 47 spruce street and is doing something in the yard banging on something, and we don’t have a house with a sightline, can I get a drive by or foot unit to check it out?” For a neighborhood of 200-300 houses, having just one house there and a vehicular is easy, and it gives them the ability to watch everyone, get to know everyone, and see who is going ot be a problem. In reality I would assume they would have three or four houses with part-timers at least on top of the dedicated command post, and vehiculars from all of them available to be called up if needed.

Again, when we began, they were looking to intimidate to get control, so they put screws in my tires, and then showed me what was in my neighborhood as I drove through, putting on a show, which was considerably more dense than that. I’ve seen it firsthand, and when you factor in almost all of their network is part-timers on call, it is massive.

Finally, I see the same thing on youtube videos, and those people are not dissident, nor do they have power. I’ve seen more than a few who are homeless people. In one case, the guy was walking down the sidewalk, and people were purposely crossing from one side of the sidewalk to the other, just to walk into him as he filmed.

If you want skeptics to believe in TIPS-Stasi, you need more evidence than the one government posting you’ve provided.

What about the article by the CIA officers saying they don’t do humint drops with assets in countries because this is how surveillance is run now? Or the fact all surveillance budgets, assets, and manpower rosters are classified, even though they are domestic law enforcement.

I am not overly worried about proving it. It has gone too far, and I am quite sure it will come out in the near future. But this is a good exercise in honing my arguments.

Except I am not seeing a threat when I observe the coverage arrayed around town to watch the environments where I don’t go, I am just seeing behaviors I recognize are applied to me, and which are being done places I will never go. I am totally un-invested in that, beyond thinking it bad for the nation.

Likewise, my mom told the stories she did years before I could have thought this even possible (and before she could have believed it), of people talking loudly about private things they shouldn’t have known about, in front of her on public transportation, in a way she felt was strange. She blew it off as strange coincidence, as did I, because the alternative explanation of a group who was screwing with her was too weird. That would speak to her not being paranoid. Now, it is clear to me she was describing exactly, something she could never have imagined existing – and it does exist. She saw this, described it perfectly, and denied it being possible, before because she couldn’t have believed it was possible. And in doing so she described something which we now know is real, whatever scale you want to say it operates on.

Governments clearly can form things like this. The Stasi recruited a network about this big and watched everyone at some point. The Gestapo would approach children and ask about parents. It is obvious it has all been done before. Insisting it could never happen today sounds like saying communism has never really been tried right. It happened back then, and people, sadly, aren’t that different today.

Today’s government, at its core may be even more corrupt, as I am not sure the Stasi had child-trafficking and pedophile rings elevated, or a government whose leaders were actively selling out the people to their nation’s most sworn enemy for personal payments. I think we may have had a more corrupt government before Trump than any commie country, and it would have had more money to create something like this at its fingertips. Why leave this degree of control on the table? I don’tthink they would, and TIPS clearly shows they had it on the to-do list.