News Briefs – 05/01/2022

Re: “Scooping private data doesn’t violate Fourth Amendment if the owner can still access it, court rules. Basically, applied to the real world, the government can search your house, they just can’t take anything out the door with them. Meaning privacy does not exist. Wait until people find out this principle was not just being applied to them online, but in their homes as well.” 

Sorry, but I’ll have to hold my nose and side with the Ninth Circuit on this one. Haven’t looked into the details, but apparently the guy signed Yahoo’s TOS when he stored his data with them. As noted, “TOS [terms of service] eliminate all Internet privacy”. So don’t sign the TOS if you want to preserve your privacy; it’s that simple. Would you turn your private correspondence over to a neighbor for storage if that neighbor explicitly told you he would have no obligation to keep it private?

The Ninth Circuit has followed the law here. It’s not the predator’s responsibility to explain to the prey how not to be prey. As you repeat again in today’s post, this world is Darwinian. The “fittest” survive; the rest don’t.

One of the first things I learned ~40 years ago when I began serious red pill studies is that they always actually do follow the law. So how do they get away with applying a “capitation” tax that is expressly prohibited by the Constitution? For a long time I thought it was due to some sleight of hand with the wording of the “Sixteenth Amendment”. But recently I’ve come to understand that that whole show was just a distraction charade, since the Sixteenth “amends” a document that no longer has any legal force anyway. The country has been ruled by decree for 161 years.

UC Berkeley School of Law professor Orin Kerr is supposedly “one of the US’s foremost scholars of the Fourth Amendment”. If so, he must know that the Fourth Amendment hasn’t protected anybody from anything since 1861, when We the People, the author (see the Preamble) and owner of Constitution, declined to enforce it against a president who egregiously violated it, thus rendering the document a dead letter. 

They’ve kept it around since then precisely because they can do whatever they want, while distracting the people into spending useless time, money and ink (or pixels) on irrelevant arguments. So long as a pacifier shuts you up, they’ll keep sticking it in your mouth. 

https://twitter.com/MorlockP/status/1520178944498089986?s=19
Oh, hell yeah. (This guy’s books are good, too).

I had a shower thought. I hate tabloids and papparzi. I never understood why anyone ever would care about the personal lives of so-called stars. But since everything else is a lie, perhaps even the plebs loving the personal lives of the so-called stars is also a lie. Knowing how things work a bit better, I am fairly certain that most people, even the fairly vacuous and low IQ people don’t actually care that much about the so-called stars. It should be natural instinct to only really care about those you know personally and maybe a degree or 2 outside of that. Maybe that bit more but I am not so sure even there. It should be in the firmware, so to speak, to only care about the personally affecting things. So IQ shouldn’t actually have that much to do with it. If anything, low iq and low class people tend to care even less than us relatively intellectual people who comment at your site. In my experience that is the case. So assuming that no one actually gives a shit, which in my experience of both high and low iq bears out, no one actually cares that much except for the most heinous of crimes. And even that may be a bit difficult to trigger for various reasons related to information transfer and believedness.
So, my point, is that 1) they need to create distractions of a social nature and at a technical level even that is difficult due to basic human instinct. It isn’t actually all that easy to make people focus on people they don’t personally know. And it may in fact be harder to do with people less given to abstract thinking than we are. How much time have we wasted wondering why anyone would care about such things when in reality no one ever did? Our supposed mental inferiors may be dodging the bullet of wasted time much more effectively than we did. And 2) the patsy’s otherwise termed as stars may be the most susceptible to that kind of psychological manipulation. They have no need to know how they were pushed up. They have no need to know that no one actually cares that they gained 20 pounds. They are told people know and care. And being vain, and diagnosed as vain, before they were ever pushed, they are the perfect people to be threatened with mass ridicule. How likely is it that these people were chosen mainly as scape goats, for lack of a more accurate term, for these continuous distractions instead anything of importance? I said it was technically difficult to focus people’s attention on it, but I didn’t say they lacked the technical expertise to focus people’s attention. Of course they need the grist for the mill, and the so-called stars fit the bill perfectly. You need something to talk about before you can actually talk about it. So why not make it yourself and leave no doubt to a reservoir to draw from?
In the case of you, AC, the gangstalking aspect should be obvious. With no other obvious reasons for existence, the interest in them being fake to some greater or lesser degree, the intense paparazi must be there for those people personally, not for the masses. It is, essentially, an appeal to their vanity which they were selected for from the outset. A method of control the so-called stars are susceptible to, no doubt selected for in fact.
Anyone with the potential of having some ability of weathering that storm gets no publicity. AC and his r/k isn’t publicized because he can handle being made fun of without much harm. The same with me and x-linked inheritance. It would not be an effective strategy because we would take the abuse and use it to learn and become more effective. They realize that, through advanced psychological diagnosis, and know better. And so it isn’t even attempted. Like that mother-jones interview of mine which never saw the light of day. A lower minion thought it might help, and probably got orders not to follow through once the actual consequences, quite tolerable to me, were realized. I think this is a much more accurate perspective on the so-called stars. Thank you for humoring this shower thought.