News Briefs – 03/05/2019

==CORRECTED VERSION OF POST==

>”But I still hate to attack the group when we have guys like Jarrad in it, who are fighting with us. It just feels like betrayal.”

I want to make it clear that I do not hate Jews (religious or racial), just like I do not hate Muslims or communists in the sense that I don’t hate an individual for being a Jew (either racial or religious) or a Muslim or a communist (in fact, many people who self-identify as such have no idea of what they are actually supporting (they’re useful idiots)). Criticizing the ideology does not equate to hate for those that self-identify with it.

Kushner (a racial and religious Jew), for example, he said in an interview some days ago that Israel should open its borders.I think this gives him big points because in saying that he opens up a dialogue that we can take advantage off by showing to the gen public on how so many zionists that defend open borders for the West defend the exact OPPOSITE thing for Israel. I don’t think Israel should open its borders at all, and I don’t really believe Kushner does to, but I can see him being smart enough to use such a statement to give the people who are better informed an opening to redpill the gen pop on the typical zionist hypocrisy. That being said, I still think its a disgusting aspect of Judaism for it to force genital mutilation on children. I think he should convert along with Ivanka, to be honest, I kinda like them both on a intuitive level and they strike me as good people, although that changes nothing about my opinions on the ideology of Judaism (and the facts about Judaism that support those opinions on Judaism of mine).

—
—
>”That so many happen to be Jewish I see as their hook into Cabal.”
For some reason, cabal always has had a close proximity to Judaism and Jews (don’t ask me why thou, I have no a conclusive answer and to write all the speculations I have about it would take me WAY to long, kek).

That does not make all Jews into cabal assets automatically, but the decisions and plays of the cabal in the past and “infrastructure” surrouding Jews that they’ve prepared over the years (in terms of “hate”-speech laws, Holocaust-“survivors” forced payouts, the engineered general public perception of Jews as a group that is always the victim and never the abuser, etc) have made Jewish collective power into a major tool in the cabal tool box. My proposed set of solutions for the JQ aims at terminating Jewish collective power without arming individual Jews, and I think its pretty sensible and effective.

—
—
>”I feel better about it when I consider a lot of what you write that needs to be fought, about them restricting freedom of speech, creating these all-powerful interest groups, taking over positions of power – those are all things Cabal doles out. I do not think they could do that on their own. I see Germans like Merkel opposing all Holocaust questioning the same way I see her importing all those migrants – those are Cabal orders.”

And I agree with you. This is why I aim my proverbial sights at Jewish COLLECTIVE POWER, not at all Jews as individuals.

—
—
>”If Cabal told her she was going to round up the Jews and kill them, I think she would do that without batting an eye. I could propose the greatest interest group that everyone would love – but if it was not Cabal-approved, no way it would ever get off the ground like AIPAC. It would get no media, no money, and if by some chance it got money, it would get investigations and prosecutions – and if it beat that, I would get taken out.”

Agreed.

—
—
>”So I agree Zionism is to be opposed by nationalists, but I still think Cabal is the problem, and something that makes it worth supporting guys Like Tommy Robinson, no matter where they fall elsewhere, if they are a thorn in the side of the Cabal (Which I believe he likely honestly is, because he has unwittingly described intelligence tactics deployed against him which I do not think he would have broached, if he were controlled opposition.)”

I agree that cabal is the top problem and that zionism is merely a tool of the cabal (like communism, Islam in the West, etc).

Regarding Tommy Robinson (and all other zionist gatekeeping shills like Cerno, Laura Loomer, Alex Jones, Lauren Southern, Jordan Peterson, AIM, etc), the way I see it is this: they are useful in the sense that they introduce less informed but actively-information-seeking people (those that no longer trust the MSM/Hollywood normie indoctrination apparatus) to some facts, but by design they will manipulate them as soon as they can given their established level of trust with the audience. This is what makes them exploitable by the people who care about truth 100%. What I mean is this: in a perfect world for the cabal EVERYONE would trust the MSM/Hollywood 100%, and if that was the case, they would NEVER allow ANY “alt”-media “e-celebs” to gain traction on the various social media channels (because they would not need to). Given that some percentage of people will invariable ignore MSM/Hollywood and its non-sense, they need to put these gate-keepers in place in order to not lose 100% of their control over what people that reject MSM/H are exposed to. Off course, by design (and the cabal surely hates that things are like this), gate-keepers HAVE to give their audience SOME amount of truth and facts in order to stablish trust with the audience, which is always BAD for the cabal, but its an investment, they have their gate-keepers feed the audience SOME truth in order to have the audience not get ALL the truth (its kinda like a stop-loss on a investment, you lose some money in order to not lose all the money).

That the cabal has been ordering/allowing that the zionist gatekeepers reveal ever more facts that end up hurting them is telling that they are gradually losing more and more control over the narrative to the point that their gate-keepers have to keep revealing more and more (but by design, NEVER more than necessary to stablish trust).

So how do we exploit the zionist gate-keepers (notice that ALL of those, no matter how they go about things have that in common, ALL of them are zionists)? Simple, we ask them questions that end up revealing their own masters even if they don’t answer them (because ignoring a question is also an answer). I developed a protocol which I call “Flat Tire” (because of the Laura Loomer fiasco about her flat tire scam) that explains it. You can read it here: http://archive.vn/tK8Dw ; and here is the same thing in graphic format along with some Q crumbs related to the issue of Mossad shills: http://archive.vn/I6kJz

The fact that we can exploit the zionist gate-keepers puts the cabal in a tight spot because: their shills are now giving their audience more facts in order to keep trust with the audience, while we use their own audience reach against their masters and use their own reach against the zionist masters. Its a great thing because if the cabal shuts down any of their established “e-celebs”, they have to build another one from the ground up (which means it has to bring MORE to the table than the previous ones, otherwise the audience will just call them a copy-cat and a plagiarizing cunt), and if they don’t, then we can piggy back on their reach to attack their masters. We put the cabal use of zionist gate-keepers to put them in a no win situation (that is, as long as they use GAB, and GAB does not nuke our posts that exploit the gate-keeping shills).

—
—
>”Let me ask you something slightly off-topic, since a lot of my history is weak. So the Jews who pushed Communism were Cabal – meaning Cabal had influence over the early Soviet Union. I’ve assumed the Soviet collapse was in part, Cabal pulling support for some reason – either a geopolitical change they wanted (perhaps to create Western hegemony so they could deteriorate the west with decadence absent any threat, and then collapse it), or they lost control and decided to take Russia down in retaliation. Between the Cold War and now, do you see any clear sign the changes from the Soviets to Russia involved a purge of that element from the leadership? I’ve thought so, since Russia seems ostracized from the world, and prevented from reaching its full potential in the way the west effortlessly dominates areas economically, and clearly it is not prone to the same self-destructing silliness we see in the West.

In short what is your opinion of the influence of Cabal on the Russian government this moment.”

Kek, I think you give me too much credit because I am somewhat weak on history too. The only reason I know about all that shit regarding communism and Jews is because I started my digs on 4chan as a newfag into Antifa and Islam, because I thought those were the ultimate enemy of the West (I was uber naive, of course). I didn’t even knew about the JQ per se, I knew the MSM was made up of mostly Jews, but it was much later that I had enough information to see how Jewery was so awfully connected to what we call the cabal (and before Q came into the scene I had no idea about the connection between the UN and the zionist clicke, for example, if it weren’t for Q’s crumbs, I would never made that connection probably). From there I found out about Cultural Marxism and the Frankfurst School (which is directly connected to Jewery), and the historical connection between Islam and Jewery, etc etc.

You can say that I ended up over-specializing in the JQ because that is what happened, I just saw it connected to so many things that I thought were disconnected-from-each-other threats to the West that I decided that it probably would the best way I could invest my research time and energy for the most gain (meaning, zionism and Jewery/Jewish collective power are not the only components of the cabal, but if we can take those down, you can get rid of the other MUCH more easily (and this is just my opinion on the cost of opportunity, I might not be correct about that but I think/feel I am)).

That being said, I can give you my not-as-informed-as-you-might-think perspective on the things you asked me about:

>”Between the Cold War and now, do you see any clear sign the changes from the Soviets to Russia involved a purge of that element from the leadership? I’ve thought so, since Russia seems ostracized from the world, and prevented from reaching its full potential in the way the west effortlessly dominates areas economically, and clearly it is not prone to the same self-destructing silliness we see in the West.”

From my very information limited perspective on the issue, I would say this might be relevant to your question:
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/so-who-really-tried-to-blackmail-yeltsin-takeover-russia-nsa-cia-or-investment-bankers/

Archive link for the same link here: http://archive.vn/LQih0

(If that shit is confusing (it is for me), you can see Martin explaining the whole con using a pen drawn graph in his documentary “The Forecaster” (which I recommend you watch anyway even if you don’t need the drawing to understand the Boris Yeltsin trap)).

Basically, Martin Armstrong claims that Boris Yeltsin (which was at the head of Russia since the collapse of Soviet Union until Putin got into the place in 1999) was conned into getting into being susceptible to blackmail via a huge IMF loan, which ended up with him being forced to not seek re-election and resigning to give way to Putin. If you notice carefully, one of the names implicated in that shit-show called the Magnitsky Act is the pro-eminent Jew (which I think is a zionist although I can’t find the source on him being a zionist right now) that have since taken arms against Trump called Browder (watch this: https://www.cbsnews.com/video/bill-browder-on-past-dealings-with-russian-lawyer-in-trump-jr-meeting/ ).

Also notice that Putin claims that:

“For instance, we can bring up Mr. Browder, in this particular case. Business associates of Mr. Browder have earned over $1.5 billion in Russia and never paid any taxes neither in Russia or the United States and yet the money escaped the country. They were transferred to the United States. They sent [a] huge amount of money, $400,000,000, as a contribution to the campaign of Hillary Clinton. (Later, the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office spokesman Alexander Kurennoy clarified that it was not $400 million, but rather $400,000.[61]) Well that’s their personal case. It might have been legal, the contribution itself but the way the money was earned was illegal. So we have solid reason to believe that some [US] intelligence officers accompanied and guided these transactions. So we have an interest in questioning them.”
(source: http://archive.vn/PjRkF )

This is pure speculation and I am going on my guts here, but I think there is a possibility that Putin is indeed a force against the cabal and that it might be possible that the collapse of the Soviet Union could have been an attempt by the cabal to re-take control over Russia after having gotten in at the start of the Soviet Union but then lost it in the meanwhile (as the communist Jews lost control of the Soviet Russia).

Also notice that if cabal was using some faction of Jews to control Soviet Union (the communists) and had lost control of Soviet Union at some point (which is plausible if they were exerting control over Russia using the only the communist Jews, Jews implemented communism in Russia but then lost control of the Soviet Union (and the question is, did the cabal lose control when the communist Jews lost control or not)), it would not be beyond the realm of possibility to have the Soviet Union collapse in order to re-establish control, this time via “democracy” and Boris Yeltsin.

But my speculation begs the question: if Putin was helped into office using the play against Boris Yeltsin, and that play was facilitated using the IMF (which is no doubt a cabal comped institution), how did that happen? Did Putin pulled a Trump by making the cabal feel like he would be easy to control and then flipped the bird on them and went his own way and decided to start the process of cleaning Russia (which would imply fighting against the world-wide cabal), or did the good guys managed to infiltrate the IMF and convince/manipulate everyone involved in ousting Boris Yeltsin that there would be some kind of benefit in doing so and putting Putin there instead? I don’t have answers to those questions. For what is worth it, Putin strikes me as a Patriot who wants the cabal to get fucked as much as we do. Its probable that Putin put a lot of money under his control, but the way I see it, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, it was complete chaos, military was not getting paid and officers were selling tanks and weapons (I think I read something about even submarines) on the black market for example. Who knows how long these kind of “wild west” shit went on for. Perhaps Putin putting a shit load of money under his control came down to the fact that if he didn’t, then someone who didn’t gave 2 shits about Russia would get that money. At the end of the day, the world is shades of gray, not black and white, but in the overall, I feel like Putin is a white shade of gray (and notice I used the word feel, it a gut thing and not based on hard data).

Or perhaps Soviet Union never collapsed in the 90’s, and cabal was in control of Russia ever since the commie Jews took control of it and until Putin it was only different puppets in Russia management while cabal was in full control (Jews or no Jews implicated). I could see very well the the US MI using NSA or some other asset to pull the play against Boris Yeltsin as a way to help Putin get in place in Russia so when the time was right and they get their own man in the US gov (in this case Trump), they could start the pincer movement against le cabal.

Also, there is this statement from Putin that I think is probably honest where he says “They never thought we would become a military power again.” Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqD8lIdIMRo , around the 2:35 mark forward (although I recommend you watch the whole thing, its worth it).

I think what he means by that is: “the cabal collapsed Russia and took control over it, but Russians took control of Russia and we rebuilt it from the ashes into a super-power again, despite them not wanting that”.

Honestly, I don’t really know how useful my reply is regarding those questions on Russia, but overall, if you ask me, based on my very limited information on the subject, I’d say Russia is managing to push back on the cabal in some way, and I think Putin is a key element on that.

Cheers!

I’m very curious as to what the cabal influence is in Russia. And it’s hard to say, but I’ll offer these observations:

There’s gotta be something behind the constant animus towards Putin in cabal media. We know he purged a lot of oligarchs from positions of power and that this was met with claims he was a thug, gangster, dictator, etc., This and the constant agitating for war with Russia, the constant wish for sanctions, etc., indicates that, at the very least, cabal influence is far from what they’d wish it to be.

Putin’s concern about GMOs, his push to raise the fertility rate, the lowering of the alcoholism rate, etc., all suggest a concern for public health we don’t normally associate with Cabal.

Most importantly, Putin’s deep support for the Russian Orthodox Church and the incredible building spree of new churches, seminaries, etc., is definitely something that both Cabal and Vatican have no interest in.

As to Soviet collapse, I think in general Cabal wants to end Russian society and civilization. There’s all sorts of resources right under that society, and the strength of that society forms a layer of protection around those resources. Right now, the west cannot extract those resources without in some way strengthening the population.

I heard one interesting thought about the fall of the Soviet Union. It suggests that it was a strategic withdrawal in order to open markets as the Soviets were falling behind in integrated circuit technology. This would make some sense considering not only the economic importance of computers but also specific applications such as CNC machining. If you’ll recall, in the 1980s in the midst of the Japan bashing in the US there was a deep fear that the Japanese might sell advanced machining equipment to the Soviets that would make possible things like the fabrication of submarine propellers that produce reduced levels of noise.

My guess is that this is completely plausible. Note that Russian manufacturered goods had a reputation for being “crude”. Well, that’s not a cultural or behavioral thing. It’s a technical/economic thing. Now that they have CNC machining equipment, they are producing stuff as precise as everybody else.

So maybe it was a strategic retreat followed by a shock at how aggressively the West rushed in and tried to destabilize things. Putin seemed to be put in power as an attempt to shore up things.

Russia is known for a pretty intense state security/intel capability with the FSB, etc., I have no doubt that its sole function is not to protect Russia from the US. It’s to protect Russia from Cabal.