Practising Christians are the most likely among faith communities in England to support the Eurosceptic ‘Brexit’ position.
Muslims, meanwhile, are the most Europhile of all the religious groups, a new survey has found.
The findings came in the new Populus Hope Not Hate survey which throws light for the first time on what different religious groups feel about the EU referendum in June.
The EU is a social construct designed to modulate and contain aggression and competitiveness between in-groups. If you want your in-group to go at it and outcompete others, a super-governing body designed to contain that will feel constraining. The only way that feels good is if you are a rabbit, and want everyone constrained to a single level of uniform sub-mediocrity, so you can’t fall behind.
A large part of a country’s life course will be determined by the type of migrants it attracts. If it lures prospects with the possibility of aggressive free competition, no guarantees, and a cost to failure, you will attract K-strategists. They will want to compete and will seek freedom to do so, both for themselves and their nation. If you dangle free stuff, ease, comfort, and easy sex, then you will attract r-strategists and they will seek to get everyone controlled, so the success of others can be reapportioned to them. Clearly one type of migrant is more desirable than the other if you seek a free, successful society.
The big advantage to this is if Europe begins a purge of rabbits and foreigners you can expect these Muslims to spontaneously migrate out to Muslim nations with greater safety and ease, just as Muslim migrants fled the fighting in their Muslim homelands to head for Europe. It will substantially reduce the fighting needed to free Europe when the time comes.
… if Europe begins a purge of rabbits and foreigners you can expect these Muslims to spontaneously migrate out to Muslim nations …
I had also thought along those lines. Muslims are incredible pedestalizers of their women – paradox as it might come across, muslim society is far more attuned to what women wish then western society – and conversely they allow them almost any kind of abuse: as long as the woman doesn’t stray into sluttiness, she’s almost guaranteed to get her way.
It’s worth looking at them too even if it’s not very edificating: the women mostly become fat as a walrus, and the fatter the more conceited and irascible they become. The men, OTOH, when they’re young are faux-alpha for some years, strutting around haughtily until their usual diet of sugar, bakery and cheap fats (all in excessive quantities) makes them into flabby shufflers. Behaviorally, en treat women who aren’t either family or married and in the good graces of islam, like absolute shit. Shocking to watch.
A little known psychological trait of muslims is also they’re among the most “near to authority” groups on earth (study conducted by IBM in the 1980s IIRC), so disposing in an exemplary manner of a few fat cats among them could easily precipitate an exodus of avalanche proportions towards their homelands. The few straggler K-selected ones should be easy to demoralize and cleanse once that has happened.
At this point I’m wondering about the connection between white-knightery, r-selection, faux-alphaness and treating women like shit.
“you are a rabbit, and want everyone constrained to a single level of uniform sub-mediocrity, so you can’t fall behind.”
huh. why they don’t like smart people.