Flashback to young DA Robert Mueller (notice the original was taken down):
David Asimov, of Living Oak Court, Bennett Ridge, Santa Rosa, the son of the late science fiction writer Isaac Asimov, was sentenced on March 28, 2001 to six months’ home detention with electronic monitoring and three years federal probation for possessing child pornography. U.S. District Court Judge Maxine M. Chesney sentenced Asimov after reviewing a series of sealed psychiatric reports, one of which was ordered by the court. Asimov who was charged with four federal counts of possession of child pornography with each count carrying a five year sentence, pled guilty to two counts in a plea bargain deal. There was no forfeiture of any of Asimov’s assets in this case, despite his owning a home in Santa Rosa purchased in 1996 for $375,000, and despite his receiving $3,000 per month from his father’s estate.
How did Asimov, who possessed one of the largest stashes of pornography in California, skate away from federal prison? A look at the players yields the answer.
Asimov’s child porn stash was so big many child victims and perpetrators would have taken a fall, had Asimov been zealously prosecuted at trial.
Asimov would probably have escaped detection, if he had not taken his personal computer to a store when its scanner and color printer malfunctioned. A technician working on the machine discovered images of children engaged in sexual acts with adults. A store supervisor contacted the police. Asimov’s case is not the only case where tips about child porn were generated by store technicians. It seems either child pornographers are stupid about fixing their computers or they are unwitting framed.
The police raided Asimov’s four-bedroom home with a search warrant and discovered the largest child porn “processing center” ever discovered in California.
According to OAN’s report, he was supplying high-level Hollywood elites, and other famous people – for which he needed mass production capability.
I casually observe ground level Cabal all the time, trying to meld observation and extrapolation to get an idea of how what I see operates. One interesting aspect of Cabal is the gypsy/cult-like aspect of it. Parents inculcate children, who I assume go on the be Cabal themselves.
I’ve wondered if I was being initially viewed as a potential prospect because r/K appeared likely to spread. I’ve wondered if I had a kiddie porn problem, or some other compromizable aspect, you would be seeing me running for office this very election cycle, and Evopsych would have been into its 31st printing and its 27th language translation. I didn’t have such problems, and I assume my psychological assessment was viewed as being in need of control and suppression, to make sure I never get close to the levers of power.
What I believe is, had I been brought into the network, I would have probably been bringing all subsequent generations of my family into the network as well. Now because of Q, I also assume entry to the network would have involved doing fairly horrific things.
The reason I find this article interesting is, Asimov, being a famous author with a book deal from a major publisher, clearly would have been Cabal. I would have bet the house on it, had you asked. Those deals do not drop merely on the gifted, to reward them for their skills. Viewing it all in light of other stories, I almost wonder if Asimov was publishing stories written by some poor nameless schlub who kept submitting manuscripts to publishing houses in return for constant rejections, in between being gangstalked into his ultimate suicide.
Regardless, had you told me Asimov had a son, I would have assumed he would have entered the network as well, though what role he would have filled would have puzzled me.
It is interesting to see they found him a gig, and put him to use. And it is even more interesting to see other known Cabal were giving him the exact same immunity to the law that we see being flouted in our faces every day today.
Bring the Storm.
Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because Q says it is going to be a big week
Arthur C Scott was a giant predatory pedophile as well. Moved to Sri Lanka when he was too much of a pedophile for Jimmy Savile-land to cover up.
None of the suspicions about Piers Anthony or any of the other scifi authors surprise me any more, either. Moira Greyland’s book exposed just how filthy and infested the entire scifi community is.
I recall an FBI agent saying that Star Trek was always involved. If they were doing a search warrant, and they found a couple of Star Trek tapes, it would probably be a dud. But if there was some dedicated room full of toys and spaceship models and photos and signed shit and tons of meticulous ST tapes… there was a giant pile of CP somewhere nearby. Always Star Trek, not Star Wars, too.
“Always Star Trek, not Star Wars…”
That is fascinating. Soft SciFi vs Space Fantasy. Is there a reason for this?
>Moira Greyland
Have you read this mate?
https://askthebigot.com/2015/07/23/the-story-of-moira-greyland-guest-post/
Pic related: http://archive.is/1xWsF
Quote from the article:
“Now it should be noted that boy lovers do not think of what they are doing as “molestation.” To them it is sex, they imagine it is consensual, and any objections will certainly be overridden by the orgasms they are certain they can produce, and it is the shame of these orgasms that silences the boy-victims, and persuades them they “must” be gay. (Regardless of subsequent heterosexual marriages and children.)”
—-
Related video: “The Wages of Sin”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbGS6jb4WfI
America is the gay disco.
Bring the Storm, purge the world.
In your world the Cabal has been controlling everything since July 1939, yet somehow allowed the utterly subversive writings of authors like Robert Heinlein, to today, say, Peter Schweizer and his Government Accountability Institute coauthors, stuff also put out by major publishers. Issac Asimov wasn’t just “a famous author with a book deal from a major publisher”, he’s one of the three major authors in the founding of the “Golden Age” of science fiction, along with Heinlein and the also pretty subversive A. E. van Vogt. For a bit more on relevant trends in this period, see the faction fight between the overtly leftist and political Futurians which included Asimov, and the rest of the field, despite your assumption of Cabal backing they only captured about half of SF back then.
Which is not to say there wasn’t endemic child sexual abuse in this group of oddballs, as everlastingphelps mentions, the current best reference, although I don’t know if it touches on stuff this early, is Moria Greyland’s The Last Closet: The Dark Side of Avalon (Marion Zimmer Bradley was 9 years old in 1939). And as he also notes, well, even as a sheltered teen in flyover country in the late 1970s, when I learned that Arthur C. Clarke had moved to Sri Lanka, his excuse of it being a great place for diving was paper thin despite his love of the ocean, I immediately assumed it was for greater freedom for diddling boys, not that I’d gotten a direct impression he was into that from his writings.
Supposedly Cabal getting effective control in the US goes back to 1909, although apparently their infiltration went back further. That was just supposedly where they reached critical mass, and got the government.
Note also that the pattern I see is Cabal takes all positions, establishment, anti-establishment, liberal, and conservative. That has two effects. One, they can control the dialog entirely in times of emergency, because even Heinlein is theirs, so even the guy the subversives lionize will tell them what Cabal tells him. And two, they can manipulate the dialog to maximally splinter the population and pit them against each other, which prevents them from focusing their ire anywhere else.
I will tell you right now, there is something out there that controls things, and it is bigger than anyone would ever believe, and controls far more than you would think possible.
I can’t really see your Cabal allowing Heinlein to publish Red Planet, Between Planets, The Puppet Masters, Tunnel in the Sky, Citizen of the Galaxy, Starship Troopers, and The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress. More to the point, your Cabal is not monolithic, and pretty much impotent given that Peter Schweizer is still alive and being published by major houses with his bibliography, unless of course those are just to help keep the political class in line. Which I’ll admit is needed with out current one, the Instapundit keeps correctly pointing out we’ve got the worse in our history.
A greater issue is your claims about how much direct surveillance they put so many people under, the math doesn’t work out for me, along with this conspiracy being so vast and yet so airtight against truly damning leaks. I’m not aware of any known conspiracy in history that was that good.
As I see it, your Cabal theory is unfalsifiable, which makes it ultimately uninteresting. Or put is this way, is there any evidence that could come out that would make you realize you are wrong about it?
You have to understand, I have seen rock solid evidence of it first hand, so you would more or less have to show me that I am really in a hospital bed with a stroke. At some point, when this all goes public, I will roll out videos for you of people in it actually talking openly about it. They actually seem to have their own subculture. What will blow you away is you don’t know, mixed with how reckless the operation is. It has opened my eyes to how easy it is to fool a population – even me, because I would not have believed it eight years ago. People have biases, and it takes a lot to make them shake them. What will really blow your mind is you have seen it – on the news, and had no idea what you were looking at because of your conditioning.
Just a quick piece of info – Look up Operation TIPS. Somebody was perusing the Citizen Corp website, and saw a proposal requesting volunteers for a civilian informant network pilot program. It wanted one million citizens in eight cities to volunteer to report to a handler, preferably people who had access to homes like plumbers, and who could do illegal searches of the residences for their handler and document and report on what they found. If it was the eight biggest cities, it worked out to something like one in 24 people would have been reporting to a government handler – and it was just the pilot program. No telling how dense the network was designed to be at full force. It would have been 340,000 people in NY City alone sworn in as private surveillance to start, I assume getting a stipend or tax beak, or some other benefit, for making themselves available to their handler when he needed something. Think about how many handlers that is. And that is documented.
So this guy shopped it around to reporters, a civilian informant network specifically designed to get around the Fourth Amendment, that would have dwarfed the Stasi, and nobody bit in the US or Europe. They were afraid to touch it, or they got orders not to. He finally got some small paper in Spain to run an article on it, at which point it made it into the US media, and the program was supposedly killed. Except it wasn’t, it was just not rolled out as publicly.
Once you get to those types of numbers, like 300,000 people in New York City, you don’t “follow” everyone with a team behind them. You have a dude on every corner smoking a cigarette, or panhandling, or making a call, and he updates the foot surveillance in the area on where you are as you pass. He isn’t assigned to you, he is assigned to that corner. You go in somewhere, the corner guy radios in and foot follows you in and acts like they are shoppers too. All you need is one controller for you with access to surveillance and traffic cameras in real time, LPRs, all the stuff they have merged together, and who can send the civilians and pros deployed where you are directions via apps on their phones, to deploy the phased coverage in that sector on you.
Look, I just inform people here of what I think they should know. This is something I think people should know, because I love the ideal of America, where we are all on the same team, and we have rights and freedoms, and the government machinery doesn’t squash the little guy, because the people don’t want a government that oppresses people just because it can, least of all at the behest of corrupted people like Obama and Hillary and Brennan who are working for God-knows-who.
Believe it or don’t, I know there is no way this remains in America, now that the guy they targeted is President. So wait and see. You will believe, even as you can’t believe.
As far as I can tell it is like the police force, only about ten times bigger, and composed of people who would deny they are a part of it.
https://infogalactic.com/info/Denial
I’m fairly sure they are much like the mafia with many different families. They mostly leave each other alone but occasionally ruin each other if they feel the other is too weak to stand up to them. I’ve heard this has happened in various ways from various sources.
I’ll give you one example. One of the child prostitutes involved the Belgium’s X Files, Dutroux Affair, told a story where she was sure she was going to be tortured to death while younger girls watched and helped. One of the guys, in the cabal, who had sex with her liked her a lot, talked the guy in charge into selling her to him and not killing her. She herself noted that that weakness later got him killed.
“…While I had been tortured, the young man had been negotiating with the politician in charge of the network. They made a deal: he would work for the politician, extend his shady services in exchange for my life. This one good deed eventually cost him his own life. In this milieu, any shred of humanity is a deadly weakness….”
https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/anneke-lucass-harrowing-tale-of-sex-trafficking-am/
Watch the video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQFOrwyFopA
May I ask you AC if you think, based on your belief of a secret Cabal ‘hand’ controlling things behind the scenes (BTW I agree with that), that there could also be another ‘hand’ behind Trump and Q fighting on our side? I’m not talking God, but would accept His representative on Earth if that is what you believe. Which leads to the question, who is God’s agent on Earth at this time?
After all if this truly Evil, then there must be something that is truly Good.
Trump undoubtedly has something with him. Clearly it is military, but I have heard there is a strong masonic representation high up in the military, as well as a split in the Masons, with some having been recruited by Cabal, and others having been shut out because their mindset does not fit well with it.
I have little doubt Trump is God’s main man at this moment in time, and the military and patriots with him will one day be remembered right alongside the founders. All of them are tangible evidence of how this nation is blessed.
From what I’ve read, Freemasonry had a split in the 18th Century. The Scottish Rite, which heavily influenced the American Revolution, and later evolution in Britain, went one way and the Bavarians went another, producing the French Revolution and Marxism.
I haven’t looked into that, but I’ve looked into the idea that the American Revolution was thrown to the continental army by the British command through Freemasonry. It holds a lot of water and looks likely. There’s no doubt that key Loyalist and Revolutionary officers met in lodges before battles (there’s not-read-in officers who even express shock in their diaries that when the lodge was convened, they look out into the group of officers and realize that the opposing commander is sitting right next to their commander) and the British made a few key decisions (or rather, inactions) that led to a very convincing defeat.
Jung split from Freud and his supposed “Jewish psychology”, his term, which attributed Jewish character and flaws to all human behaviour. Might be part of the hypnotism stuff.
Go read the Patterson biography of Heinlein. Contrast what he openly shows about Heinlein’s proclivities in the first volume with his suspicious evasion of the topic in the second volume. Read between the lines.
Heinlein, Isaac Asimov, and Clarke were all serious pervs, each in his own way. Heinlein in particular was very cautious about his tastes and activities becoming public knowledge, knowing it would ruin his reputation as a juveniles author. That’s a lever of control which could be exploited to steer the tone and content of his writing.
While his tastes didn’t seem (based on surviving evidence) to extend to kids like Clarke’s did, note that he was huge on Scouting, the first half of his career (and most of what he’s known for) was writing what we now call young-adult fiction aimed at boys, he was big on “cons” and all the creepy and degenerate shenanigans that went on at them in the 1960s-1970s, used “love knows no age” arguments repeatedly in his later writing to rationalize questionable romances between older and younger characters (some of which read as blatant author-inserts/writing from life, albeit from the youth side), and dismissed the “Breendoggle” as a puritan witch-hunt in a letter to Breen’s wife, Marion Zimmer Bradley.
And that doesn’t even touch on his raging incest fetish, nudism, open marriages, and “poly” inclinations.
The gossip on Isaac Asimov is that he was a notorious and self-confessed “dirty old man”, like Weinstein without the career-controlling power.
A hungry investigative journalist could make his career exposing the degeneracy in science fiction/fantasy fandom and among its authors, particularly in the 1950s-1980s (it seems to be abating now, as the Boomer-generation sexual weirdos involved die off and are replaced by Millennial-generation SJW weirdos). Assuming he didn’t get offed first, say if it actually is a controlled propaganda channel that certain powers still want to protect.
Heinlein carries all the marks of controlled opposition. Sure, he says lots of good (and correct) things about civics and morality and whatnot, but he also throws in plenty of orgies and promiscuous (and blameless and anti-consequential) sex and the destruction of traditional marriage, etc.
Controlled opposition is rarely an outright act. You get ridiculous creatures like Richard Spencer who never really take off that way. You instead corrupt a true believer, and find the weakness they have to twist a vulnerable section to your side. The genuine part of them brings in the people who are naturally amenable to the faction, and then you emphasize the particular weakness of that asset.
Take Ben Shapiro. I think he is genuinely a free market guy and largely moral. However, he’s very tribally Zionist. He’s very conservative and loyal, just not to the USA. That makes him fantastic controlled oppo, because he brings in fans with the part that appeals to the conservative faction (which is softly supportive of zionism already), while there is the insidious treachery at his base (always Israel over the US). Jordan Peterson is good controlled oppo, because his talks on morality and self-sufficiency bring in the libertarian conservatives, but at his heart he’s a leftist, so there is always the soft apology for socialism there. The old, “I agree with you that the Soviet Union was a horrible mass murder machine… but we could do socialism right this time.”
Did you look closely at the books I cited in a sub-reply? All but The Puppet Masters and The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress were juveniles where sex barely existed (remember the Tunnel in the Sky bit where the protagonist only realized a character was a girl after she stopped wearing her body armor all the time?). Traditional marriage … well, there I think you’ve got a point, that didn’t happen either, essentially, except perhaps by example, although it just about happened in just such a wrong way at the end of Time for the Stars, with a [spoiler] cop out. Obviously, the market and his editor, who he didn’t get along with, kept him in line.
Still don’t see him as controlled opposition, the subversion again cabals he poured into the cited works plus many others is just too strong, plus I forget the notebook parts of Time Enough for Sex, the “bad luck” bit is being frequently repeated today.
I still don’t think you get my point. Controlled opposition is still opposition. They can’t be full subversion all the time, or they won’t have any followers. They have to slide the sedition in on the margins. Of course there will be books without subversion in them, but they won’t be the books that get the major machine push. The controlled oppo isn’t controlled by some shadowy agent who comes in and says, “we want a story with X and Y in it.” They find someone who already slides X &Y in, and pushes them with the machine to the forefront of the movement by giving them publicity, contracts, and exposure.
Peterson’s whole rhetoric is “boys will be boys” as if civilization isn’t maintained by the moral standards of men. So he goes on and on about female flaws and never addresses the other side of the coin (e.g. single mothers are made by men, deadbeats). Stefan does the same because what agency? Some OTHER white man will swoop in and fix their society for them!
The Cabal is so pervasive and persistent because it’s not a formal organization like the Freemasons or Mensa. It’s a family of mental disorders, many of them sexual in nature, combined with an ideology that normalizes them. We’re not perverts, we’re an unjustly persecuted minority! Whatever your proclivity, you learn to spot it in others, build loose networks, dispense advice, and help your fellow travelers out of trouble and into positions of power.
Concealing such activities from the public while also gradually bringing them around to acceptance requires high psychopathy and verbal IQ, qualities that Jews have in abundance.
Someone on Vox explained that pedophile rings exist in Hollywood because the rich and famous don’t do buy their own groceries, mow their own lawns, or grow their own drugs, so why would they drive down to the playground with a van load of candy and do their own fishing?
“sexual sadism” = all perversions
“I’ve wondered if I was being initially viewed as a potential prospect because r/K appeared likely to spread. I’ve wondered if I had a kiddie porn problem, or some other compromizable aspect, you would be seeing me running for office this very election cycle, and Evopsych would have been into its 31st printing and its 27th language translation.”
Even Bill Whittle who initially was highly excited about r/K selection theory never uses it in his analyses anymore. The reason why is because it quickly becomes a very mechanistic lens through which to view of the world, one that at its logical conclusion reduces humans to biological robots. Save for libertarians, who tend to be highly logical but unemotional, people just aren’t set up for that way of thinking.
r/K is the axis along which the Cabal has been breeding humans. You were too close to discovering something bigger.
Interesting…
Two trains of evolution – the fit Eloi and the degenerate Morlock. Similarity to Moloch considering the cannibalism a coincidence?
I wonder if Q will release the list of targeted free-thinkers so people can choose to seek out their work (and expose the thieves). I know people who’ve had writing and artwork stolen only to pop up under someone else’s name or the works disappear.
Fun fact: Edison worked on a sci-fi novel. “In the Deep of Time” Cabal Cabal Cabal. Predicts “Elon Musk’s” Mars dream to a tee. Oddly, we never hear from people from his past, like people who went to school with him. It’s like he just popped into existence from a psychological profile of reddit fandom and mimicked this old Martian colony sci-fi plotting. There was also a King Elon of Mars in a latter sci-fi story. Coincidence, I’m sure. FYI, his ex-wife was posting a Martian bit of “jewelry” (talisman) he designed, posted with the hashtag Illuminati. This was like 2014.
Pigs