The arrests of Dr. Nagarwala and two others last week represent the first federal female genital mutilation (FGM) investigation in United States history. FGM is common in the Islamic world, particularly in Africa. According to UNICEF, 98 percent of Somali girls and 87 percent of Egyptians have endured the procedure. FGM involves removing varying amounts of the victim’s — usually a pre-pubescent girl — clitoris, labia majoria, and labia minora. In its most extreme form, the victim is “infibulated,” having virtually all her external genitalia removed and being sewn up, leaving her with only a tiny hole from which to urinate and menstruate.
Nagarwala’s attorney, Shannon Smith, claimed in her initial court hearing that no cutting of the seven-year-old alleged victims took place and that excess skin was simply scraped off to be buried in a religious ceremony. The Free Press, however, reports that documents they reviewed show the injuries to the two Minnesota girls’ genitals were “much more severe” than Nagarwala is claiming.
That is even more evil than I had thought before.
The rearing urge in K-selection involves mirror neurons. You look at your child, and feel what it feels yourself. If your child is terrified, you feel its terror. If your child is in pain, you feel its pain, maybe worse than your child does. Your child’s future attainment of success and happiness is more important to you than your own, because you want to feel it yourself when you look at them.
We say these things are logical, but really they are instinctual. We say they are moral, but we recognize that loving our children is moral because we evolved underlying instinctual urges to feel that.
To let this happen to your child, you have to have no attachment to it at all. By our evolved moral framework this is evil, and I cannot imagine any coexistence between such people once the collapse goes down.
Until then, guess who is trying to solve the problem:
The establishment media is hiding the dramatic news that President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice has announced a national campaign to eradicate the imported practice of Female Genital Mutilation.
By ignoring the imported FGM practice, the TV networks “are guilty of aiding and abetting violence against women out of a politically correct fueled fear of offending Muslims,” says an April 18 statement by the Media Research Center and ACT for America.
More and more I believe Donald Trump was sent by the hand of God.
Spread r/K Theory, because if anything should be destroyed it is female genital mutilation
[…] More Details On The Wonderful Migrants We Import […]
I wonder if this practice is in any way related to Chinese footbinding. Something inflicted upon girls by their own mothers in an attempt to make them more sexually competitive. It’s a wicked cycle: A girl makes a change to herself to make her stand out from the crowd – men connect the act to the idea of sexual availability and soon a fetish springs up around it. Women engage in the act more and more, knowing the more extreme it is, the more they’ll stand out, the better their chance of netting a high value mate. (Also, the more debilitating the act is to the girl, the higher her status, since a mutilated body signals that the girl doesn’t have to do hard manual labor in order to get by.) Girls who don’t engage in the act are demonstrating their lower status and are thus “priced” out of the sexual marketplace.
So, in the space of a few generations, we have footbinding, restrictive corsets and pale skin, necks stretched on thick coiled wires, giant fake breasts and (in places where sexual purity is held at a premium,) mutilated genitals. A woman signalling that she’s willing to entirely forgo a lifetime of sexual pleasure in order to embrace her wifely duties must seem very attractive to a potential mate, especially one who is r-selected and who would willingly sacrifice close family members for a chance to get in good with the herd. Of course, feminists would place the blame for these horrors entirely at the feet of men, ignoring women’s own complicity in these acts (most of which were actually carried out by mothers on the bodies of their own daughters.)
I’m struggling to see what would drive people even to do this. I just don’t see how it would even help women have more babies- if anything it’s an unnatural risk. Are muslim/african men just going along with this because they can’t tolerate even the slight ‘risk’ of women deriving pleasure from sex, and thus perhaps looking elsewhere- or are women in these societies doing this to remove future competition. We know that incest is very common in these cultures so are women performing these acts on daughters to keep their husbands attention on them while they’re still fertile? Also given muslim/african propensity to lie and generally make mischief are women who haven’t had FGM claiming it is “honorable” and doing it to their younger competition, with the dirtiest knife possible? The anthropological drivers for this behavior are just so evil. These people just have evil in their DNA.
“.,..Dr. Nagarwala and two others…”
Hang all three.
“The rearing urge in K-selection involves mirror neurons.”
Been thinking about mirror neurons a lot lately.
Maybe underdeveloped in Blacks and especially Somalis? And Mexicans, Hondurans, given the slaughter by the cartels.