An interesting article sent by a reader:
Alistair Owen pours most of his paycheck into what he calls a travel-and-lifestyle fund.
“I’m not saving up to buy anything,” said the 28-year-old engineer, who shares a rented apartment with two flatmates in south London. “I prefer to go out for dinner at a nice place, pay a round at the pub or explore a new area of the world. I feel like I would be losing out on living if I chose to own stuff instead.”
The stock market is starting to reflect his priorities and those of his generation — the millennials, those born between 1980 and 2000. Leisure and travel-related stocks, including pubs, airlines and pizza restaurants, have trumped retailers since consumer confidence picked up following the financial crisis. For U.S. and European indexes tracking the industries, the outperformance just reached the highest since at least 2011…
A survey by market-research firm Harris Poll and Eventbrite Inc., an online marketplace for ticket sales, showed 78 percent of millennials would rather pay for an experience than material goods. That compares with 59 percent for baby boomers. Some 82 percent of millennials said they went to a live event in the past year — concerts and festivals — and 72 percent said they plan to increase spending on such outings.
Andrew Oswald, an economics professor at Britain’s University of Warwick in Coventry, says today’s young consumers feel like they own enough already. With their material desires almost completely exhausted, millennials need alternative roads to satisfaction, he says, referring to research by Thomas Gilovich, a psychology professor at Cornell University.
“It’s now experiences that people are short on, not items,” says Oswald, whose research focuses on what he calls the economics of happiness.
Purchasing material goods is preparation. It is establishing security in an atmosphere of angst. If you know the shortage is coming, you stock up to assuage your fear of running out. If no shortage is forthcoming, then the money in your bank account becomes a source of easy pleasure, and little more.
To me, this grasshopper-spending pattern describes a spending pattern exactly opposite to that of Texas Arcane at Vault-Co. Given the choice, Tex would forgo the fancy vacation in favor of excavating a little deeper for the underground vault he intends to use to protect his family from the madness of the Apocalypse overhead. Others will spend excess funds locating the optimum survival location. Still others dream of a fortified welding/machining/metalworking shop in preparation for the day when nobody can afford new tools, and those who can fix old tools will be in a good bartering position. Those are the forward-looking psychologies which survive harshness.
People like Tex have functional amygdalae. When they look out on the world, their amygdalae flag danger signs, focus their brain on the danger, fire off aversive stimulus to make them uncomfortable. Their brains then try to assuage that discomfort by performing actions designed to blunt the bad aspects of the foreboding circumstances they see.
These grasshoppers, spending all their money as it comes in on simple pleasures like dining out, can do that happily because the parts of their brains designed to see bad are totally shut off.
So why are so many Millennials still exhibiting such r-psychologies? I have to imagine it is the national debt. When George W Bush took office we were $3 trillion in debt. When Obama leaves office, that number will be $20 Trillion. That is $17 Trillion conjured out of thin air and given to the populace. That money is sprinkled over the entire financial system, but like rain falling on a mountain valley, it quickly flows into established channels, and aggregates together as it moves on. Homeless people spend it on alcohol at liquor stores, and basic food at established food shops, and for them it is gone. Those businesses pass the money to suppliers, utilities, and shipping. Those companies pass it on to wholesalers, fuel supply, and so on. Eventually that stream of money is gone from the people it was first given too, and begins flowing through established channels, where very powerful and wealthy entities bleed some off whenever it passes by them.
In short, in those areas (like the financial/banking/investing services quoted in the article), they have seen literally trillions of dollars, drawn from thin air, and dropped in their laps. That is a lot of money flowing to a very small world.
Additionally, so far every prognostication of doom has proven false. Even in 2008, as Armageddon was upon us, the government simply conjured more money and passed it around to stave off the danger. In all of these people’s lives, there have never been consequences. As a result, their brain has no idea that consequences are not just possible – in the long term they are unavoidable.
This might open up a strategy for investing. When K is about to take hold, shorting the very r-stocks which are presently thriving would be a viable strategy, because as the nation turns K, luxuries will not be as desirable as simple necessities that will keep you alive.
Apocalypse – a money making opportunity.
I don’t think I would short them before K takes hold. The rabbits are going to go into a feeding frenzy (literally) as they see the resources running out. A rabbit that realizes that the grass is dying isn’t going to try to figure out how to grow grass. He’s going to eat all the grass he sees until his belly is bursting.
When the K-contraction comes, the rabbits aren’t going to turn K at the same time the environment does. They are going to go super-R and run up as much debt as they can (including quite a bit of fraud, I suspect.) Only after there is a large (economic or literal) die-off of rabbits will the remainder wise up and shift towards K.
It’s not the natural fate of an r species to become K. It is the natural fate of an r species to die off to a bare remnant until the resources return.
Hey Anonymous Conservative how much of the behavior of males of the millennial s change due to the females around them?
I know myself that I would of got marry earlier and around my early 20s if I found a women that wanted to have a long term relationship and children. Many that grew up with did not want settle down and have kids until their 30s and the ones that did were often not interest. I know schooling wise many young girls were encourage to go for work or education instead of motherhood.
It is also interesting to see the different between the way women used to have fun and the way they do now. the drinking is comparable to that of guys with the live for today attitude. The trailer for the new movie “bad neighbours 2” is an example of what I am talking about.
It used to be that young guy would have a little fun while they were young and the women (who were girlfriends) would try to pull them down into forming a long term married. Now Married is seen as a minefield by many guys I know want to avoid it all together especially if they come from single parent families.
I have seen guys (mainly older) destroy by divorce and lets also not forget the family courts can do to some men. Fighting just for the right to see their children. Who doesn’t know a men who got sent to court to fight to keep some of what they worked for.
These things might be some reason some of us millennial men don’t feel the need to save and to spend our time traveling (I have worked full time and saved) because doing the right thing and getting marry might leave you with nothing and worst paying for antimony. A least traveling and having fun leaves a memory (don’t get me wrong I am not agreeing with this mode of thinking). This might also help to explain the oversea of mail order brides market.
That is possible. Even so, if I were 22, I think I’d still see the trouble brewing, and be trying to do some form of prep, even if it was just stockpiling ammo.
I think you are right.
I am single guy. Should I moved to the USA or somewhere else?
I know that sounds like a silly question (since you don’t know me or my situation) but I live in Australia and the place is full of liberal people and policies. Gun control is big here and people don’t care (in fact I get into debates with people that think the US should put gun controls in). There are few people I care about, though I the history of the country and the tradition culture which is dying.
It is something I have though about many times, my grandfather left Italy in the 20s due to many things such as the economy (hard to start a company or to get jobs), crime rate and the rise of the leftist.
To the extent I think gun ownership is a crucial element which not only keeps you safe but fosters a more K-outlook in the society, I would head for an area where that is allowed, and self defense is allowed by the state. Living in a place like Texas, and being allowed to defend yourself by police who are allowed to think just like you is way different from living in a place like Britain, where the Police have to punish you for trying to keep your family safe and the entire state demands that you just die if attacked.
That not only is good for your security, it promotes a self sufficiency in the populace that will promote freedom in the bigger picture.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMhaehb5AnE
Thank you
A young single guy in the city with a closet full of guns and ammo in his rented bedroom? That has “mass shooter” written all over it. You’d be thrown in the nuthouse for sure.
Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die!
That’s why you don’t let anyone see the closet, in’it?
I’m almost 40 now, but at 22 I did see the writing on the wall, and did start stocking preps, even if I didn’t get married until 3 years ago.
This is one area I struggle with, if and when the apocalypse comes what will the level of severity be? Will it be so severe that having stocks is irrelevant? Will it be a retreat to the stone-age because of WWIII? Should you own gold or would skills and ammo be more productive?