Migrants On Welfare – Two Approaches

There is the r-strategy, designed for when resources are free:

Thousands of refugees are taken in by Switzerland on an annual basis, granted asylum in the country due to war-torn conditions in their home countries. But while Swiss residents may be okay with their government taking in the tired and poor, they may not be too happy about a recent report in the Basler Zeitung.

According to the Swiss newspaper, thousands of refugees head back to the African nation of Eritrea every year, despite the fact that it is supposedly too dangerous for them to live there. The paper reports that many of these refugees have been rejected for asylum status in Switzerland, but Swiss authorities are unable to deport them back to Eritrea due to the dangerous conditions on the ground.

The paper said that as many as 50 Eritreans a day are traveling from Switzerland back to their home countries for vacation. To compound matters, many of these refugees are wards of the state in their adopted land. In other words, they are using Swiss welfare dollars to return at will to a country that is, by government policy, too dangerous for them to go back to.

Then there is the K-strategy:

President Donald Trump is considering an executive order that would target some immigrants for deportation if they become dependent on government assistance.

The Associated Press has obtained a copy of the draft order that calls for the identification and removal “as expeditiously as possible” of any legal immigrant who relies on certain kinds of public welfare benefits.

The order, if signed, would also focus the government’s efforts on blocking immigrants who are likely to become reliant on government benefits.

K-strategists operate as if resources are too short for everyone to have everything they want, while r-strategists operate as if we will always be in a perpetual glut. Even though both our nations at this moment have similar levels of resources floating around, we have vastly different leaders with vastly different psychologies. The reason two leaders can come to such different logical conclusions lies within r/K Selection Theory.

You have to ask, why is it we would not have gotten any of this with any Cuckservative President to date? The Republican Party Establishment has been r-selected – corrupted by money, power, ease, and lack of threat. Now as K rises however, the Establishment has proven helpless to stifle the rising K.

Trump was exactly the right K-selected leader at exactly the right moment in the nation’s history, just as K rose to a sufficient level.

You still have to wonder if this one-in-a-trillion leader was just chance, or whether the Divine was intruding on our fate to save us. If the latter, it would not be the first time. Nor will it be the last.

Tell others about r/K Theory, because this is the time things will turn K