This is unacceptable, but it demonstrates a point:
Sean Matson, who recently left active-duty as a Navy SEAL, said the military measured his head four times – each time before deployment – with plans to provide him a more advanced ballistic helmet.
But the new helmet never materialized. During a deployment in Africa, Matson and six of his fellow SEALs each shelled out about $900 for updated helmets that held the lights, communications devices and batteries needed for their missions.
“There was never a clear solution to it, so guys were going out spending $800-$900 on their own ballistic helmet,” said Matson, who is now CEO of the military supply company Matbock.
Elite troops such as the SEALs are more and more forced to dip into their own pockets to purchase basic military gear such as helmets, global positioning devices and medical supplies, according to Matson and others involved in the military’s unofficial civilian-side supply network who came to Capitol Hill on Thursday.
Duncan Hunter is on this, and I’m sure Trump will be very interested in resolving it if Hunter has trouble.
However notice, if some round-heeled skank isn’t forklifting a fresh palletized crate of free taxpayer-funded diaphragms into her garage each week so she can service as many guys as her vagina can handle, feminists amass on the steps of the Capitol like a swarm of bees following a queen to a new hive. You’ll never hear the end of it.
Here, a SEAL we are sending through the gates of hell lacks basic important equipment he needs to survive his mission, and he shrugs his shoulders, scrounges his cash, and quietly buys it himself without complaint.
These are two different psychologies, designed for two different environments. The K-strategist expects shortage and is designed to cope with it, while the r-strategist is designed for free resources, expects them, and freaks out if they are not forthcoming.
[…] By Anonymous Conservative […]
I ended up ditching the GI socks I was issued in the Air Force, because frankly they suck. I ended up buying a bunch of the Thorlos brand socks in the color that matches what the AF used. Only thing is, they cost about 12, 13 bucks a pair at the exchange (When I could get them). The military gives you a clothing allowance after your first issue in basic but it would have been less wasteful to have given us decent socks from day one. Oh, and the first set of rain gear I was issued in basic was made out of some god awful plastic with an equally crappy padded insert that everyone referred to as “diaper-bags.” They were so bad that eventually they made a fleece vest and raincoat that actually was pretty good. I still have that. The diaper-bag was thrown in the trash where it belonged.
I will say that the GI boots I was issued have served me well over the years. The current pair I still wear sometimes is just about worn out but it has lasted me almost five years, including a trip to Afghanistan and a job as a tower climber.
Michael,
Have you got a link to those boots? I haven’t found anything that lasts a full year since my issued pair (’77) wore out. I wore them for ten years or so.
Thanks
Fred
Fred,
I honestly don’t know how the newer generation of boots, starting with what i was issued in ’09 would compare to your ’77 boots. Most of the markings have worn off so I don’t know the manufacturer. My closest guess is that they are Corcoran, as their ABU boots have the same vibram outsole and Goodyear welt as mine, rather than adhesive construction.
The boots I ordered specially for winter in northern Afghanistan were Bellevilles. Those used some sort of patented molded construction where the polyurethane midsole is molded in place with the leather upper, and afterwards the outsole is attached with glue. Supposedly these are more rugged than typical adhesive construction and can be resoled like stitched boots. However, I live in Florida and hardly ever needed to wear them after I came back, so I couldn’t tell you how those hold up over years of use.
Here’s a link to the closest type of boot I could find:
http://www.amazon.com/Corcoran-87546FR-Steel-Safety-Marauder/dp/B0022QVCKC/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&qid=1456774174&sr=8-8&keywords=corcoran+boots
Cool! Thanks man. I wondered if those were they.
Do you know of any good websites or charts that quantify that type of spending? For example Stef talks about single mom’s a lot, but it’s hard for me to get a grasp of the level of the problem. How much of the federal budget are single moms consuming? What percent of federal expenditures go to women and what percent are paid by men? By single or married people? These are questions I’d like to learn more about.
I don’t know. I’ll take a look around.
Pay an economist called Aaron Clarey. He does consulting and he’s pretty cheap.