A court in Munich has ruled that the hotel in eastern Germany was under no obligation to divulge the identity of a man who may have impregnated a German woman during a three-night love affair…
The case was further complicated by the fact that four men stayed at the hotel during the period in question who had the first name of Michael.
The only other information the woman knew was that the room they stayed in was on the second floor, according to a court statement…
Since the woman could not describe the man in detail, it was impossible for the hotel to identify just one man…
Judges said the man has the right to control his own personal data, along with the right to protect his family and marriage, according to the statement. Those rights took precedence over her right to child maintenance payments, the court added.
Either her amygdala is so addled it failed to flag a single distinguishing characteristic about him, or she ran into a Mexican Luchadore on vacation, and those guys really never remove their wrestling masks – ever.
So she slept with him for three days, but didn’t know his name and could not even describe him. And now she wants to go to government, so he will have to send her a check every month for the cost of her pregnancy.
Promiscuous mating, expectation of free resources, and no loyalty – to the guy or the child who will now grow up impoverished and fatherless. Any maybe a little need for the additional stimulation provided by sleeping with an anonymous guy in a scary Mexican wrestling mask.
This is the rabbity world of peak r-selection. Is it any wonder Germany is overrun with violent Muslim migrants?
Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because Mexican wrestling masks are useful to have around
[…] Typical for the times: A court in Munich has ruled that the hotel in eastern Germany was under no obligation to divulge the identity of a man who may have impregnated continue […]
The rabbit judge will probably just let her pick the highest earning of the four.
r-court: protects the male’s promiscuity, his access to free resources and his lack of loyalty. the ‘hit-and-run’ male rabbit won’t pay for his actions in any form and shape but the state will. this is the reason ME migrants gather. if the court would hold such males responsible the r-selection would not spread like butter, no? remember, even in gang rape cases, where women’s faces were covered not to see the rapists (as in one of the cases in Sweden, 8 gang rapists – one girl) the woman could not identify the males, the court released 6 out of 8. nobody got to know who they are. their id/reputation is that precious to the r-selection state policy. the raped girl life is destroyed, got 10 000 usd as compensation from the state. the 8 afghani gang rapists migrants costed the tax-payers 50 000 000 sek, most of it paid to their defense lawyers. the r-state does not inform anyone about it and if anyone does talk, the get persecuted. again: r-court protects and promotes male promiscuity, sadism, access to free resources and lack of loyalty.
I do think the guy is at fault (as in he shares the fault with the woman) here, however, traditional K-based law says the child of an unmarried mother is that woman’s responsibility. The man only assumes financial responsibility by marriage, which is why women are supposed to marry as virgins. If his identity happened to be revealed, he would not be entitled to actual paternal rights, he would just be treated as an ATM. Traditional law says the person who is entitled to custody also has the full responsibility to finance this custody. We need to becomes wolves, not livestock. This may be a case of a judges going K and defying the single-mother matriarchy.
As to the gang rape, was there not dna evidence? A woman’s testimony is not valid evidence to prosecute men for rape. Even if they happen to come from Afghanistan.
b has this right, the judge is rewarding the male rabbit, encouraging his behavior. The female rabbit will never really face the consequences of her actions, some beta will white-knight rescue her or the state will.