Is The Head Of The FISA Court Owned?

Interesting:

Evidence shows that John Roberts, chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, was “hacked” by a Deep State surveillance operation overseen by Obama administration CIA director John Brennan and Obama director of national intelligence James Clapper.

Roberts, the Bush appointee who made the decisive vote to uphold the constitutionality of Obamacare before the 2012 election, was allegedly the victim of the same Deep State surveillance program that spied on President Donald Trump.

Tapes released by Federal Judge G. Murray Snow — preserved on a Whistleblower Soundcloud page — show real estate billionaire Timothy Blixseth explaining Brennan and Clapper’s surveillance program to Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and detective Mike Zullo. The existence of this surveillance program has been corroborated by Wikileaks’ “Vault 7” release and by the public comments of former CIA and NSA contractor Dennis Montgomery, who says he worked on the program for Brennan and Clapper.

Montgomery has gone public with his claims exposing how the program was used to spy on President Donald Trump when he was a private citizen. Montgomery has gained immunity and desperately wants House Intelligence Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes or other lawmakers to call him to testify about what he knows.

On the explosive tapes, Blixseth walks Arpaio and Zullo through the details of the program on a computer screen. At one point, the three begin pulling up specific names of targeted individuals.

“You know who that guy is? That’s the head of the FISA court they hacked into, Reggie Walton,” Blixseth tells the investigators.

“John Roberts, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, was hacked,” Blixseth tells Arpaio and Zullo.

LISTEN TO THE TAPE HERE (18:00 Minute Mark)

Ever wonder why almost all of those FISA warrants get approved? The shadowy Deep State knows all and controls all. I wouldn’t doubt they even have a say in who ends up in that position to begin with.

It will make for an interesting future. As the internet strips control over the public debate from a system that previously relied on the control of a select few Fake News media-outlets, the struggle to maintain that control over the Alt-right, Channers, and Redditors will become more and more fierce. As the struggle heats up, the struggle itself may begin to rise to the surface on the uncontrollable internet and further reduce the control of the machine. Already we pretty much know the Chief Justice is probably a pawn, delegitimizing the entire Supreme Court. And who thinks Congress is untouched? And it is all downhill from here, as ever more corruption comes out, and the online right’s perceptions move into the mainstream.

At some point, it is not impossible the people at the top who are running the Deep State will either face full exposure of their activities, complete with consequences they will never abide, or they will have to make a decisive move to seize full control of everything openly, complete with silencing of the online dissidents.

If the Apocalypse isn’t fast enough, and some as yet unpredictable event brings exposure to the fore, I would actually bet on the latter.

That will wake up amygdalae fast.

Spread r/K Theory, because it is an incorruptible idea in a corrupt world

This entry was posted in Conspiracy, Decline, Intel, Politics, Surveillance, Technology. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
7 years ago

[…] Is The Head Of The FISA Court Owned? […]

IAmNotTheNSA
IAmNotTheNSA
7 years ago

I get the feeling that as Deep State activity grows, the current internet will become unusable by anyone expressing ungood thoughts. It’s just too easy to uncover someone’s identity. Even Tor isn’t infallible — there are several flaws in Tor that allow users to be found if an adversary is well-funded and determined enough, and these flaws are inherent to all low-latency networks, so they can’t just be fixed.

Pitcrew
Pitcrew
Reply to  IAmNotTheNSA
7 years ago

Anyone expressing ungood thoughts will be hundreds of thousands or millions of people. A government that already has the number of problems ours does should focus on solving them, not silencing people. What they would find, is that silencing free speech would be just like seizing firearms. I just find it kind of funny, a government going broke going after some trolls on the internet. It’s like a retarded internet tough guy on steroids.

IAmNotTheNSA
IAmNotTheNSA
Reply to  Pitcrew
7 years ago

>Anyone expressing ungood thoughts will be hundreds of thousands or millions of people.
I don’t think they’ll go after everyone making a comment they don’t like. They’ll go after the people running the websites used to communicate these ideas. They’ll find out who they are and use some of the exploits and botnet software that’s been leaked to access the computers of people they don’t like and plant evidence. After the evidence is planted and “found” by the investigators, they’ll arrest the site owner and get an activist judge to throw the book at them. With the ungood websites shut down, it won’t matter how many people privately hold these bad thoughts, as they won’t be able to organize online. And if proper methods are brought to bear to prevent ungood people from organizing in meatspace as well, the powers that be will have eliminated any organized threat.

There are some methods of accessing the internet that are anonymous to the point that I think even the NSA could not find your identity, but they are all very time consuming and require a great deal of knowledge and effort to pull off, so 99.9% of the population simply can not or will not follow these measures. For the rest of us, there’s Tor, which is good enough against all adversaries less capable than the NSA and even good enough to stop the NSA unless they put serious effort into identifying you personally.

If they do, then you’re hosed. Even Tor won’t save you. And while the NSA certainly doesn’t have the resources to go after everyone individually, they definitely have the resources to go after one or two “problem people” individually.

Pitcrew
Pitcrew
7 years ago

When animals are hunted they thrash the most right before they die. They don’t accomplish anything by this, but it can be interesting to watch.

David
David
7 years ago

We entered a social mood mania around 1995 and have pinned the needle for 22 years. Social optimism & trust grew to unprecedented & pathological proportions, allowing political, cultural and social pathologies to metastasize in ways too numerous to articulate.

Just as the rot of Enron was embedded while its stock price soared, and analysts kept a “Buy” on it all the way down, it was only after the stock cratered that the public’s thirst for and openness to the true scandal exploded.

When markets top and then collapse (sooner or later), much of the murderous gangrene stinking throughout government & corporate America will finally spew into the open. The truth is already there, all we await is a public in the mood to finally see it.

Sam J.
Sam J.
7 years ago

A honest guy could ruin these people. I mean the people doing all the deep State work. They have their asses hanging out. They’re not so competent they just have lots of money, resources and are very aggressive because they believe they will never pay. I wonder if Trump will ever take them on? I have a feeling that he might buck them a little. Notice how right after the election he totally cucked. I’m guessing someone showed him some videos or he heard some tapes but later he started getting back to his old self. Maybe he has stuff to counter them and figures that he can take them all down with him. At the same time he can’t go too far or out come the tapes.