Good way to cull high DRD4 carriage:
Butler County Sheriff Richard K. Jones said his deputies don’t use Narcan now and never will under his watch, despite its effectiveness in reversing the effects of heroin overdoses.
He is the only southwestern Ohio sheriff whose department doesn’t use it.
Deputies in Hamilton, Clermont and Warren counties all carry Narcan.
Drug overdoses continue to be the leading cause of death in Butler County, according to the coroner, and the county is on track to break last year’s record for the highest number of overdose deaths.
The bottom line is, you make your own decisions, and you take your own chances. Doing something stupid, and then demanding everyone else pay for Narcan and manpower hours to save you, and in the process create a program that will save a high proportion of thieves and criminals, is immoral.
Eliminating the program, letting everyone know, and letting everyone make their own decisions is the most moral path and the most respecting of freedom.
For now, resources are free, and everybody is so shielded from threat that they allow the Narcan programs. But let the Apocalypse hit, let everyone come home to a house that was ripped off by some junkie looking for a ten minute high, and let the cost of the program really hurt, and the nation will be united in outlawing Narcan.
Ironically, that ostensibly cruel program will lead to a more innocent nation where kids can play in the streets again, and people will leave their doors unlocked.
That is K-selection, and it makes the world a better place.
[…] Hardcore K-Sheriff Won’t Use Narcan […]
Bring on total and absolute Social-Darwinism! It’s the only way to be sure.. (yeah that was an Alien paraphrase)
Tough love, for our culture and people.
The issue you are proposing is how drug policy might be crafted to better facilitate the success of K-evolutionary strategy. This really isn’t about reducing drug addiction or creating safer communities at all. Perhaps the two goals are to some extent mutually exclusive. Portugal’s harm reduction/organized crime crack down halved it’s heroin dependency rates. This obviously doesn’t serve the evolutionary purpose of weeding out potential addicts. We would want more addiction to more dangerous drugs.
Suppose we took a still more radical measure: Fast-tracked executions of both minor and and high level drug offenders. The trouble with this policy as an evolutionary strategy is that it might cause sharp reductions in drug use. You can see the problem: the selective pressures on addicts would be relaxed as a consequence!
So if weeding out heritable addictive traits is the aim, in addition to not providing the necessities of life to any intoxicated person (drunks injured in fights, collisions or falls, heroin overdoses etc) we might also *facilitate* drug traffic while simultaneously withdrawing any social subsidy (eg. Eliminating welfare, removing the application of law enforcement from such areas altogether.) In the context of high-birth rates in drug infested communities, this latter measure in particular might have the most evolutionarily significant effect.
A large scale reduction in government, across the board, would be the only way to cull rabbitry hard enough to save the West.
My guess is when the debt bombs go off, that is exactly what the cities will see.
Oh don’t get me started on these fucking cunts who shoot heroin! I regularly hear from cops and EMTs about all the narcan they have to use to keep these idiots from dying from overdosing. The druggies know that the heroin is laced with fentanyl and other dangerous additives, but they prefer that stuff because it makes for a bigger high. Never mind the fact that it takes three to four hits of narcan just to bring these guys back from the jaws of death.
What they will do is have one guy use while the other one watches. If his buddy starts suffering the effects of an overdose he just calls 911 and the EMTs revive him with narcan. Then next week he will be at it again, overdosing and getting another hit of narcan. They’ve stopped jailing people who overdose so they think nothing of calling for help, and their buddies are safe due to so-called Good Samaritan laws. You would think with all the money these addicts have for drugs they could pay for their goddamned narcan! Never happens though. We need to go Duterte on their asses!
Fly the colors:
https://rwdeathsquad.com/products/duterte-dare-1
Think of it as Evolution in Action.
A city councilman in the same county has suggested adopting a Three Strikes policy by the town’s EMTS: (http://www.wlwt.com/article/middletown-considers-3-strike-policy-on-responding-to-overdoses/10215284)
‘Last year, there were 532 overdoses. So far, only halfway through 2017, there are already 577.
After the first two overdose rescues, the person would perform community service for the equivalent amount of money used on the lifesaving response.
The third strike is a bit more controversial.
“If the dispatcher determines that the person who’s overdosed is someone who’s been part of the program for two previous overdoses and has not completed the community service and has not cooperated in the program, then we wouldn’t dispatch,” said Dan Picard, Middletown city council member.’
It’ll never pass, but at least the threat is out there, inflaming Amygdalas.