Google Engineer Posts Honest, Viral Post Criticizing SJW Ideal – Execution Is At Noon

Maybe not an execution, but Vox should put a call out to his Minions for job opportunities, because this guy will need one:

I value diversity and inclusion, am not denying that sexism exists, and don’t endorse using stereotypes. When addressing the gap in representation in the population, we need to look at population level differences in distributions. If we can’t have an honest discussion about this, then we can never truly solve the problem. Psychological safety is built on mutual respect and acceptance, but unfortunately our culture of shaming and misrepresentation is disrespectful and unaccepting of anyone outside its echo chamber. Despite what the public response seems to have been, I’ve gotten many personal messages from fellow Googlers expressing their gratitude for bringing up these very important issues which they agree with but would never have the courage to say or defend because of our shaming culture and the possibility of being fired. This needs to change.

TL:DR

·Google’s political bias has equated the freedom from offense with psychological safety, but shaming into silence is the antithesis of psychological safety.
·This silencing has created an ideological echo chamber where some ideas are too sacred to be honestly discussed.
·The lack of discussion fosters the most extreme and authoritarian elements of this ideology.

Personally, if I was going to burn in, I would go out with style, doing the old Breitbart – “Fuck you, Fuck you, and Fuck you too! In fact, fuck all of you.” Beginning by capitulating to any leftist ideal is just inviting attack.

That said, this poor bastard’s days are numbered, and I would be surprised if he isn’t named and shamed after he is fired.

This is what is now manifesting as the tyranny of the minority:

How Europe will eat Halal?—?Why you don’t have to smoke in the smoking section?—?Your food choices on the fall of the Saudi king –How to prevent a friend from working too hard –Omar Sharif ‘s conversion?—?How to make a market collapse

The best example I know that gives insights into the functioning of a complex system is with the following situation. It suffices for an intransigent minority –a certain type of intransigent minorities –to reach a minutely small level, say three or four percent of the total population, for the entire population to have to submit to their preferences. Further, an optical illusion comes with the dominance of the minority: a naive observer would be under the impression that the choices and preferences are those of the majority. If it seems absurd, it is because our scientific intuitions aren’t calibrated for that (fughedabout scientific and academic intuitions and snap judgments; they don’t work and your standard intellectualization fails with complex systems, though not your grandmothers’ wisdom).

The main idea behind complex systems is that the ensemble behaves in way not predicted by the components. The interactions matter more than the nature of the units. Studying individual ants will never (one can safely say never for most such situations), never give us an idea on how the ant colony operates. For that, one needs to understand an ant colony as an ant colony, no less, no more, not a collection of ants. This is called an “emergent” property of the whole, by which parts and whole differ because what matters is the interactions between such parts.

The minority rule will show us how all it takes is a small number of intolerant virtuous people with skin in the game, in the form of courage, for society to function properly.

It is true, any minority today can dominate society solely through aggression. But this rule only holds for r-selection.

When you have an r-environment, where the sane meet the insane, the insane will usually dominate since the sane will seek the easiest, most conflict-free path forward, while the insane will neurotically explode if they are not allowed their insane demands, and their compulsions will motivate them more effectively. Where the insane are the left, even though they may not be physically dangerous, they still manage to control the dialog through this mechanism. Of course insane is a sliding scale, and when the Muslim suicide bombers show up, suddenly the rabbits will not have the high ground anymore, and the minority in control will get just a little crazier.

But when K-selection hits, the rule is embrace the conflict. Then the ones who will rule the society are simply the ones who win, ie the fittest of the fit, who by virtue of that will usually be sane. We see that beginning already.

Clearly given the highly r-environment in Google however, this programmer is going to be doomed, unless he is actually able to present the perception that he and his kind will kill everyone unless Google listens to him.

There may be a little bit of a lesson there.

Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because it will make K-strategists the loud and aggressive ones in society