I’d like to weigh in on the Kevin Spacey (age 26)/Anthony Rapp (age 14) tip-of-the-iceberg pederasty scandal that may rip open Hollywood like the hull of the Titanic.
Speaking as the only person ever charged for “crimes against humanity” (not a joke) in significant part for discussing the pedophile core of “gay” male culture – and one of the first people ever listed as a “hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center (for documenting that culture at the core of Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party) – I’d just like to say, in advance, “I told you so.”
Frankly, however, pedophilia is too broad a term for this all-too-common aspect of homosexual orientation and misses the gender-specific nature of the problem. The correct term is pederasty, euphemistically known in historic “gay” society as “man/boy love,” as in the infamous North American Man/Boy Love Association, or NAMBLA – which was a regular participant in the early “gay”-pride parades before the LGBT movement got taken over by the marketing and PR strategists of the Democratic Party.
To be clear, I’m not saying all or even most men who identify as “gay” molest children. Even the word “children” is misleading in this context, since “children” connotes preschool and grammar school ages, while the target of pederasts are young teen and slightly pre-teen boys. And I’m not saying lesbians share this problem to the same extent that it exists in male homosexual culture (though lesbian abuse of girls is a problem, too).
What I am saying is that male homosexuality identity (from the days when the ancient Spartan military routinely drafted pre-teen boys and paired them with adult homosexual men) has always been oriented toward youth…
Here is the issue. Gays have reduced disgust, and disgust is one motivator for avoiding older partners with more sexual partners and increased risk of disease exposure. You would think that gays would prefer older, less inhibited partners, and the additional disgust stimuli would only add to the amygdala stimulation, producing greater arousal for their deadened amygdala than the already disgusting stimulus of a same-sex partner.
Conservatives have higher disgust reflexes to help them avoid pathogens, and should prefer younger, less disease-exposed partners who would trigger less disgust. And yet we see conservative K-strategists frown on the wooing of underage partners, and many r-strategist gays who expressly prefer moving on underage partners.
Only r/K would explain why those whose sexual preferences are reversed in the same way sexual dimorphic traits reverse according to r/K, would prefer younger partners, exhibit low rearing/protective urges, and exhibit reduced disgust. It is all part of the r-selected suite of urges, with an overexpression of the reversal in sex-specific trait preferences you see in r-selection.
Wouldn’t this also support a viral theory of homosexuality? That a neuro-virus, much like toxoplasmosis, replicates itself by inclining it’s victims towards younger sex partners so as to further replicate the virus?
Interesting. Possibly.
Gregory Cochran’s gay germ theory.
The Public Relations coup of the century was the gay lobby passing off priests in the Catholic Church as pedophiles rather than the homosexuals that they were. By definition, pedophilia means pre-pubescent and could be either boy or girl but when you look at the victims they were always male and were either going through or had passed puberty.
This of course was done to protect both gays and the church. By not allowing priests to marry, the Catholic Church became one big closet to hide in. Gays benefited by deflecting their perverse nature from the public and the church benefited by no having to fire half of the priesthood.
It is very important that the forces on the right not let this happen a second time when the lid blows off of Hollywood. They, along with the gay-stream media and the left will use the exact same play book they did with the Catholic Church scandal. When this becomes ripe we need to rub their noses in it to where they will never hurt or confuse anyone again.
Personally I hate the word pedophilia as it is very misleading. Lewis Carroll’s famous innocent pictures of nude preteen girls was “pedophilia”. We should be using the term “child abuse”, “child molestation” or the like. We need a new term besides “pedophile” for something who rapes or murders a child.
[…] Source link […]
Look up the history of Moira Greyland (daughter of Marion Zimmer Bradley and Walter Breen), especially her comments with regard to the Milo controversy of about a year or so ago. This is really, really normal and not really all that big of a secret about the male gay community; most of them are gay because that’s the way that they can rationalize that they’re the victims of sexual abuse as children.
I’m not sure it’s rationalizing. Sometimes I get the impression it is the shock actually remodels/recalibrates the amygdala. But I think there is a genetic root too, probably tied to r/K.
Hey AnonCon- Very well argued.
I’d love to get your thoughts on human reproduction in general.
Do you think humans are inherently monogamous or polygamous? I believe I read somewhere that more children have been born into polygamous families throughout history than monogamous ones, but I might just be imagining it or conflating some other statistic.
What about age of marriage/childbirth? I know that r/K considers age of sexual maturity (engaging in sex) a variable tied to a population’s r vs k’ness, but what do you think we ‘evolved’ to do in that respect?
And do you think homosexuality is something genetic or cultural or something shaped by environmental factors in childhood? Or a combination of the three?
-JL
I think there are humans that come out designed to be polygamous, and there are humans that are not, and I think they are very different overall. But there is genetic evidence that many males do not breed, indicating there are males that are producing a lot of children with different women, presumably on the sly in many cases with other men raising them. But I don’t think you can say humans are one or the other, because some of those males and females are very monogamous, and others are very not-monogamous.
As for age at first intercourse, the evidence is that it is diminishing now, so I think in many ways we are designed with genetic predispositions all over the spectrum, but we are also adaptable around those predispositions, probably mostly through epigenetics.
Homosexuality is an accidental overshoot of r-selection, probably involving a genetic base of extreme r. But there is evidence which makes me believe it is extreme dopamine, perhaps from drugs, laid on top of that for generations in some cases, but in other cases it seems early sexual molestation can hit that genetic foundation and somehow remodel the amygdala to produce it.
Well here the avoidance of the older more experience person is countered that in a K culture you wait until marriage for children and behaviors likely to produce them. So the ‘old’ are clean. Also you look for a mate that is old enough to produce offspring form such behaviors, so the too young don’t work. Although the acceptable age for a woman historically has generally been mid teens. Where as a man had to be more established and thus late teens or in his twenties.
Come to think of that, it matches the Gay pattern of the younger partner being in the teens. Also in most of these setups, the younger partner can be assumed to be usually operating at diminished capacity for making good decisions.
It wouldn’t surprise me if SPLC has been working with NAMBLA for years. They’re basically both part of the same organization anyways.
“…Conservatives have higher disgust reflexes to help them avoid pathogens, and should prefer younger, less disease-exposed partners who would trigger less disgust. And yet we see conservative K-strategists frown on the wooing of underage partners, and many r-strategist gays who expressly prefer moving on underage partners.”
The reason why conservatives (K strategists) don’t want underage partners and yet the r strategists do is not just the disgust. It is more because of three reason:
1. Virtue and morality thinking, K’s are very rules base and if the laws (Religion often most important, Nation or ideology) and/or the society rules (it doesn’t have to be written down but just what is expected of a good civilian) say you can’t married x then you don’t married x. if a r’s want to do x they will either break the law, test the law, change the law, move to a place with that law or blend the law
2. Long term vs the short term thinking..The K is thinking not just himself but his family, and society. The long term of their actions is important to K’s. if their actions is going to affect their family, relationship with god, society (nation) and/or themselves then they will less likely take such actions. Having relations with a young person will led to three things one it will damages the young person who one day will grow up and be trouble for society, two it will hurt your family reputation (bad for gene pool) and three it will damage you in financial, finding a relationship and possibly lock up. Also possibly spreading disease.
r’s are more likely to think of pleasure and happiness in the moment. We might say Yolo thinking
3.Loyal. K’s are more loyal to their society, family and god. The young children is mostly like apart of their tribe and so will not abuse them sexual because loyal to the tribe is important. r’s have little to no loyal to their tribe and so have little feeling for the young person.