Every time I visit the Facebook r/K discussion page, I am reminded how much less impressive the material I throw out here is.
Case in point, the link to this:
Since the last century, the unprecedented growth in the budget of Western governments has radically changed gender dynamics…
The transfer of dependence of women from a man, to the government, affected promiscuity values. Women’s sexual attitudes vary according to their perceived economic dependence, both at the cultural level, and at the individual level. Women’s promiscuity attitudes depends on what they can obtain in exchange for sex within a given environment.
In essence, when men support the government, women’s sexual attitudes loosen…
The voting patterns of women since the suffrage movement have been identical throughout the Western world: women vote for bigger governments, that provide more entitlements. In the United States, 10 years after women started voting, the government had doubled in size (source)…
A big government orchestrates the wealth redistribution from men to women…
Indeed, women are the primary beneficiaries of governmental programs. Women use more education services (source). Women receive income support the most. Women have paid maternity leave (source). Women receive child support (source). Women receive alimony (source). Most public sector employees are women (source). Women have shelters (source). Women use health services more often (source). Women benefit from billions in feminist programs, campaigns, lobbies, and laws.
And most importantly, these are services that women use (source)…
In a society where women are not entitled to financial entitlements, women are motivated to keep their sexual value at the highest to have a more valuable exchange currency. Men will be more willing to invest in a family when they have paternity certainty.
In a recent experiment, researchers from the Brunel University found correlations between women’s perceived financial dependence and her anti-promiscuity values (source). The more women felt like they were dependent financially, the more they endorsed anti-promiscuity values. This was also found at the state level. At the state level, median female income was strongly related to promiscuity morality…
When men pay taxes, they become useless to both women and children, at least on the individual level. Men have no exchange currency that isn’t outbid by the government. This leads to the loosening of the sexual morals, because women have nothing to exchange their sexuality for…
What, you never noticed the link between communism and female promiscuity?
Much more research at the link, making the point. He has all the pieces, except that last one – the biological purpose of the shift in sexual behavior associated with free resource provisioning.
r/K is everywhere, and everyone sees it. It is on the tip of their tongue, they are just waiting until they see it somewhere, and the light shines down on everything.
As much as I hate to sacrifice the traffic to this site, I have to be honest. That r/K Theory page is awesome. Even if you never post to the group, if you love r/K, setting up a fake Facebook account and following the Facebook r/K Theory page would be a great way to follow an amazing intellectual journey through r/K. From the videos of how K-strategist elephants watch over their young lovingly as they play, to the way rabbits look out on a woman being run over with aplomb, to news and current events that slip right by me, you’ll see it all.
Tell everyone about the Facebook r/K Theory page, because it represents with force
[…] From The r/K Facebook Discussion Page […]
You aren’t familiar with the manosphere? I recommend Heartiste to get you up to speed. There is a ton more insights like this; off the top of my head Alpha/Beta/Gamma dynamics and ‘total testosterone is conserved’ match with your observations.
Clearly I’m not Womaning properly.