If they had waited ten years, there would be statues of them being erected in the town square:
A Dutch court has convicted five right-wing extremists and sentenced them to four years’ imprisonment for throwing Molotov cocktails at a mosque, saying the attack had “terrorist characteristics.”
It is not surprising they would get caught.
One problem is mosques can easily be centers of interest to law enforcement. They may be housing illegal weapons caches or stores of bomb-making materials. They may be meeting places for radicals plotting attacks. In Europe they might even be used by Muslim criminal gangs to house drug operations on the assumption that Police will be hesitant to raid a Mosque the way they would raid a private residence. The Police might even watch Mosques thinking that they would be a target for right-wing attacks. In short, they are a place that could easily be a very interesting target for 24 hour government surveillance, waiting to see who rolls up quietly at 3AM to cart away those AK-47’s, or bags of ammonium nitrate, or kilos of heroin when they think nobody will be around.
If a surveillance operator is set up, concealed in a hide with unobstructed sightlines to all approaches, on overnight duty at the mosque, they will more often than not be bored out of their minds, wishing for anything interesting to occupy them. They are like big, highly trained preschoolers with lots of fun toys, forced to sit quietly on their hands and not make any noise.
And what happens after the thirtieth day of boring monotony? You roll up at 3AM, when nobody is ever out on the streets. They put their night vision binoculars with 4th gen image intensifier tubes on you, and see you get out of your car, and begin neatly assembling all of your molotov cocktails in a line on the sidewalk, so you can light them quickly and be on your way before anybody sees you.
That is like Christmas for them. Finally, something interesting. If surveillance is there, it is poised to put an entire follow tracking you home into motion, on a moment’s notice. If you used your own car, your license plate will probably be run in minutes.
Surveillance won’t be on every Mosque, but the increased likelihood is such that I would factor it in before engaging in any activity like this. I would scope for it when casing the target, I would try to shake any on my way to the target, I would anonymize myself at the target, and I would look to shake any surveillance on my way home. But today, I would not assume that would be enough, without a detailed analysis of the entire region’s surveillance landscape for a month prior to doing anything. Even then, there would be no guarantee. And all of that ignores the pitfalls of informants and other breadcrumbs you leave, from cell phone tracking, to a private citizen’s surveillance camera down the street.
If there is a war between the Islamic invaders and the Europeans, there is no doubt on which side I would be on. To that end, I would also caution any potential European patriots to not do anything unless they have a full understanding of how law enforcement intelligence works today. From surveillance, to informant recruitment, to undercover placement, if you do not grasp how in such an environment the real operator trusts nobody and questions everyone out of necessity, you should refrain from any activity.
Just as an example, look at the takeover of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge by anti-Bureau of Land Management protestor Ammon Bundy. Within the forty or so people taking part in that protest at that refuge, the government had 15 informants feeding them information, and one informant was actually driving the car when Ammon Bundy was arrested – and that was by design, to control the arrest.
That is a lot of people in that refuge who were sent specifically by intelligence, solely to facilitate the arrest of Bundy. Imagine what would happen if Bundy, instead of being a mere protestor occupying empty buildings, had been in a right wing European group in known opposition to the Muslim immigration. Imagine if he had been in a group that could have individuals potentially launch molotov cocktails at a mosque one day. How many informants would such a group get positioned within them? And those informants would probably be the people trying to get everyone to firebomb the mosque right now.
Between surveillance of potential targets of right wing attacks, surveillance of mosques due to crimes and terrorism by the Muslims, and the informant landscape of right wing groups by leftist rabbit governments, you can see how in the early days of any unrest between the Muslims and the citizenry, the right will experience considerable defeats, if it doesn’t gain a fast grasp of the intelligence infrastructure. My advice is hang back when the shit hits the fan, and see how things shake out early on.
Fedguv intel agencies the world over have been doing what they do for a long time, against a lot more sophisticated enemies than the mere average citizen who fears for his community’s women, and doesn’t want to live under Sharia. If you are one of these European patriots and conditions arise that demand you fight someday, you had better be as paranoid as the most paranoid Mafia Don, or you won’t be doing it right.
If you are not doing it right, you won’t be doing it for long.
Until then, learn the lessons of r/K. Times of r are not the times for conflict. These are times that favor conflict avoidance. Follow the natural plan, and do what Darwin favors.
Soon enough, there will be more than enough Apocalypse for everyone.
[…] Five Sentenced In Dutch Mosque Attack […]
Anonymous i’m a big fan of yours! I was explaining r/K Theory to my dad about how Liberals are like Rabbits and only think about themselves cause they are narcissists and he brought up a question I couldn’t explain:
“If Liberals are Like rabbits and conservatives like Wolves, why is it that Liberals always double down and defend each other while conservatives cuck and stab each other in the back?” It seems to defy r/K theory.
PS. I wish you would go on Stephen Molyneux and talk about your book. Voxday was on the show this week and he gave you credit but I would Love for you to come out and speak considering that you came out with this theory first.
Thanks again.
The problem applying r/K Theory to that is that the Republican leadership are basically rabbits, who have maneuvered themselves into positions of power leading K-strategists – something not uncommon throughout history. Once in leadership positions, they have basically free resources. Out here in the alt-right, you have to claw for every click, and fight like hell for a book sale here or there.
In the establishment right, everything is basically free. Glenn Beck clearly can’t even maintain the media empire the machine handed to him. But if he signed with Fox tomorrow, he would see his book sales skyrocket and his viewership soar all over again. I don’t think what National Review does is substantially different from what Sundance does at Conservative Treehouse, save for the fact Sundance is better at it. But I will bet National Review makes many times what Sundance does, despite the fact Sundance’s candidate clearly has a wider following, and he has a larger gang of compatriots in the nation.
And that is just the media. Get into the political/lobbying arena, at the nexus of writing laws and running big business, and you will really see free resources flow, as plenty of starry eye’d staff assistants look to sleep their way to an easy life.
r/K explains why in the nation two overall groups arise. But as you look at the individuals, you will find that some are born rabbits, and can’t go K. Some are born K and can’t go r. Others can adapt, going from r to K with harshness, or K to r with ease. It becomes really complicated at that level, and the utility of the theory diminishes.
But where it is golden is in explaining where the two political ideologies came from.
With all due respect AC, I wonder if the utility of r/K has even shown itself yet?
I have high hopes Sir.