This site has long made the case that as free resources pushes us toward an r-selected reproductive strategy, the most r-women would engage in behaviors designed to secure the most r-strategist men possible as mates. They would do this, because this would see to it that their children would be the most r-strategist children possible, and thus would be as adapted as possible to the r-selected environment we presently inhabit.
They would not do this consciously. Indeed, they might not even like it. But they would feel driven to engage in the behaviors regardless. In the most r-strategist women, this would manifest as engaging in behaviors designed to get them raped. Rapists are the most r-strategist men. They invest nothing in relationships or courtship. They don’t hang around afterward to raise the child. Instead they leave, looking for more victims to impregnate. Burdened only by the stricture that they must be able to overpower their mate, they can have nearly limitless offspring. A child from such a union could be likely to be a rapist himself, and thereby carry the woman’s genes far and wide in such an r-selected environment.
Case in point – “activist” Amber Amour:
Amber Amour, who was promoting her “Stop Rape, Educate” campaign in South Africa, shared a picture on her Instagram account with tears running down her face moments after being raped.
The 27-year-old said she was having a shower with a drunk friend who forced himself on her, in a post which has since gone viral.
This girl is driven to take a violent guy who is prone to rape, get him drunk, and then hop in the shower with him naked. That is nature imbuing an r-strategist girl with an r-selected reproductive strategy, and not bothering to tell her. Nature probably keeps her clueless to prevent her from overriding her r-strategy with intelligent behavior. In fact, I will bet r-strategists with common sense get culled by Darwin over time.
In history, when r-strategist girls emerged with common sense, the girl saw the danger of being raped, didn’t get in the shower, and didn’t get impregnated by the guy. As a result, the common sense r-strategist girl had less kids, her kids tended to be less r, and her kids ended up being outcompeted by the likes of the rapist children of this girl. The really r-girls with no common sense, produced rapist children who spread their genes far and wide, and eventually they out-reproduced any commonsense-r-strategists.
It says something about the r-strategy, that its so loathsome that the only way nature can make human beings further it’s spread is to make human beings so stupid that they get naked in the shower with drunk violent rapists, and then are shocked at how it turns out.
Now think about the universal cluelessness of liberals, in so many regards, and ask yourself if this paradigm of evolved liberal cluelessness sheds any light on other areas where the liberal is a moron. The cluelessness is actually an integral part of how nature programs them to be r-strategists. In the case of the r-strategy, stupidity is adaptive.
From the perspective of Darwin, the r-strategist doesn’t have to like the r-strategy, they just have to do it. Given how loathsome the r-strategy of liberalism is, the more clueless they are, the better.
[…] Feminists Want To be Raped – Amber Amour […]
How would you estimate the current r/K populations in the West, by percentage? And in the near future?
My guess is the spread of r/K/Undecipherable blend/[r/K-breakdown] would parallel liberal/conservative/non-affiliated/libertarian.
But it is all an estimate, and prone to change quickly with threat and shortage.
I will point out this type of thing didn’t really happen when rapists were hanged, dueled to the death or deserters shot (cuckold husbands). I heard a theory once about the die-off of the criminal lower class Europeans, including by Black Death but also Third Stage Syphilis (don’t look it up, the Apocalypse will be ~ugly~) and can’t help but wonder if we’re seeing a repeat. With more lawlessness and less freedom to escape this time. I think it might’ve been HBD Chick saying about the boon to NW Europe average IQ, very Malthusian and how it may have spawned the Enlightenment?
Insightful and scary. As my wife states, there is nothing so stupid as a stupid girl.
I lost a friend today. She wasn’t a friend so much, but more of a nice person that I enjoyed chatting with at the gym.
The conversation started innocuously enough. She was taking classes at university. The first class she mentioned was Sexual Assault class. My first response was that rape was very serious and that rape is detestable. But my second point was that women that bring false rape allegations should serve the same sentence that a rapist would. She feigned agreement. I knew she was lying. I’m not sure that I can explain how I knew she was lying.
But then things went very sideways. We both agreed that a man should never rape a woman. That part was – and always is – easy. I asked her if a woman had any agency. Can a woman act in ways that bring about rape? My case was that a woman should not dance naked while doing drugs at a frat party with randy, drunk boys at two in the morning.
SHE MAINTAINED THAT A WOMAN SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO THAT!
We disagreed about the meaning of “agency.” I caught her backpedaling and exposed her on the spot. Or on the treadmill.
Then I snapped.
I told her that it was people like her that behaved badly and always turned to people like me (either K-selected or a K-selected wannabe) for rescue. My situation was reminiscent of Mike Wallace vs the Marine that was so perfectly demonstrated by this site’s blogger. Specifically it was like the Marine saying something like “you’ll be walking down that hill and you’ll expect me to send a couple of marines to save you…and we will save you…even if you’re not an American, which you are not min my eyes.”
That’s exactly how I felt about her.
It didn’t help that I put myself in harm’s way to help a woman under attack just weeks ago. It was three migrants playing grab ass with an older, frumpy woman. At first I thought it was a purse snatching. But in a split second I learned it was something else. And I stupidly didn’t have my phone. I’ll never make that mistake again. Before I knew what I was into, I was scrapping with three men 30 years younger than me.
The last fight I was in was 37 years ago. I didn’t have a choice then as I was defending my new bride. I could have walked away from these three thugs. And I almost did. Three seconds into helping her I was already regretting it – and wondering if I would make it home alive.
So my friend on the treadmill may have relit my amygdala. I’m not sure why I lost my cool. I feel a great deal of shame that I revealed my anger so freely.
(In hindsight, it was fairly obvious that I should have distanced myself from her. We were talking hypotheticals one day and she admitted that she would sacrifice her children to feed a stranger that was hungry.)
And because it may apply here, I have to mention that she is working on a degree in therapy that she plans to use in the medical-welfare industry in the Northeast.
Any insights here would be helpful. Honest criticism is welcome. I’ll be beating myself up a long time for speaking harshly to this young lady.
And yet I can’t muster a fake apology, something that I have always been able to do.
I once knew a woman who told me she wanted to be raped, when I asked her why she never locked her door. The sex was free and easy, that is what she wanted. As a fact, she was also a Bill Clinton supporter.
[…] More evidence that feminists want men to rape them. […]