Facebook Gets Into Dating Matchups

Interesting:

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg gave the keynote address at the F8 developer conference in San Jose on Tuesday, introducing, among other innovations, the company’s new dating features.

“We are announcing a new set of features coming soon around dating,” Zuckerberg told conference attendees, lamenting that his company has been late to the dating game.

“This is going to be for building real, long-term relationships, not just hookups,” he declared.

Zuckerberg didn’t explain how he plans to prevent “hookups,” but he did say that the dating service will be “opt-in” and “if you want you can make a dating profile.”…

Instead, he said, Facebook will suggest possible dating prospects.

“We’re building things to bring people together,” the Facebook CEO said at the conclusion of his speech.

“Long Term Relationships” is the phrase that hit me in the face, for a very specific reason.

I am not in the intelligence world. But I am close enough to it to feel as if I have stuck my head in the door, and gotten a peek at the inside every now and again, and can somewhat see the world from the perspective of someone who operates in that world. Because of that, this jumps out at me. It also jumped out at me when Q kept telling people “Watch the wives,”, and follow the “wife connections.”

Intelligence is almost an entirely separate subculture in society, ruled by mores and values that are alien to regular society. For the spook being a spook is so central to their identity that they model their entire personality, moral framework, and view of others around it. In part, this is why it offers those who employ it such immense advantage. Regular society is not prepared for a people who so disregard what would normally be thought of as sacrosanct morals and beliefs. A good example of the clash of values is displayed in this passage in this article:

The two met in late 2005 on an online dating site. They shared mutual interests — traveling, learning languages, and dogs — and agreed to meet for lunch in Alexandria.

“It’s not like I saw him and thought, ‘Oh, he’s a hunk,’?” the woman said. “He was average-looking, which I later learned made him good at his job.”

By 2006, her man had come clean about his real profession. He showed her a medal with the CIA’s insignia.

“He just said, ‘I’m a spy.’ I was like, ‘Oh, wow. Why didn’t you just say so?’ ” the woman recalled. “Then I had a million questions, but he wouldn’t say more.”

They got married later that year in a destination wedding. On the flight back, she noticed that he was eyeing the movements of several young foreign-looking men. Her husband wouldn’t confirm or deny her suspicions

“He just got very angry and said through gritted teeth, ‘I am not going to have you ruin my career.’ I was terrified. He was tracking those guys. It was a real turning point,” she recalled. “I wondered, was our wedding a cover for an operation?”

Her sense of being used grew more acute two years later when her husband asked her to visit a winery with their newborn daughter.

“I said, ‘No, unless you tell me what we’re getting into,’?” the woman recalled.

He revealed the ulterior motive: A potential informant was meeting that day with a CIA colleague at the winery. But the colleague was not going to show up. The agency wanted to see how the informant would handle a surprising situation, the wife said she was told. The CIA needed her husband to observe the informant’s behavior. And the husband needed his wife, with baby in tow, to help him blend in.

The family of three found seats on a bench at the winery, the wife said. She fed the baby while they kept an eye on their target: The man in the dark suit waited 15 minutes before he made several frantic phone calls, the wife recalled. Eventually, he left.

“So many things were crossing my mind. Is he a double agent? Does he have his own surveillance? [My husband] didn’t tell me anything,” the woman said. “They should pay people like me for being involved. Otherwise, they should hire professional actors or provide training.”

I applaud his fiscal responsibility, searching out an active op in the location of his destination weding, so he could comp the entire thing on the Agency’s dime. But from a personal perspective, I’d be for the actors too, before I would drag a spouse and even a child, uninformed, into that situation. It just feels like marriage should be more of a team effort, and a closer relationship than you have with your occupation.

But spookdom is different. The spookdom is more important than any personal relationships to the most successful. You can’t be judgmental about it – that is the world they live in. But recognize how that reality leaves you weak, and adjust your understanding of reality to plug the weakness. Because I suspect at some point in the foreseeable future every American who doesn’t want to be the drone of an all powerful state/Cabal will have to deal with that reality.

One case in point is issues of sex and even marriage. The literature is rife with stories of spies who have used sex to gain intelligence. There is even a term for the art – the “Honeypot.”

We tend to think such techniques would be reserved for high level international espionage, but even domestic Law Enforcement agencies in first world nations such as the US have encouraged its use while merely trolling for targets:

To Muslim mosque members in the Los Angeles area, Craig Monteilh was known as Farouk al-Aziz, a French Syrian looking to reconnect to his Islamic roots. But behind the devout facade and convincing knowledge of Islam, Monteilh was spying for the FBI, which instructed him to go as far as sleeping with Muslim women to gain information…

“The FBI paid me to infiltrate mosques in Los Angeles and Orange County in Southern California, as a very broad surveillance operation to give them the personal information of Muslims,” he told host Josh Zepps on Monday.

That “personal information” comprised of emails, cell phone numbers, names of known associates and where they attended mosque. Monteilh said he even placed recording devices in the offices of imams and a local Muslim Student Union…

The operation included even more extreme breaches of privacy, with Monteilh going as far as dating and having sex with Muslim women to extract intelligence.

“I portrayed myself as a unmarried male, although I was married,” he said. “Within the Muslim community, they would help me to get a bride, so they would introduce me to single Muslim women. I would go out on dates and things like that. … [My FBI handlers] instructed me, if I was getting good intel, to allow it to go into sexual relations.”

The undercover plot eventually took an ironic turn when his extreme jihadist rhetoric alienated his targets, who reported him to the FBI…

Looking back on his undercover operation now, Monteilh said the monthly $11,200 compensation he received “clouded his judgement…”

We tend to visualize such operatives as merely handlers/officers/spooks goading malleable assets/informants into employing one night stands to get close to targets, but there are actually cases of full officers/spies who have gone so far as to marry a target:

Environmental campaigners had been invited to the meeting at the Cock Tavern pub in Euston in June 1999. They were members of Reclaim the Streets, a group that had days earlier brought the City of London to a standstill. By chance, two strangers sat next to each other: Jim Sutton, an articulate, if at times moody, 34-year-old fitness fanatic who relished his role as the group’s driver, a function that earned him the sobriquet “Jim the Van”; and Laura, 28, an idealistic activist. Laura (not her real name) did not know that this new acquaintance, a man she would go on to marry and have children with, was in fact Jim Boyling, a police officer living undercover among eco-activists…

Her account of how she came to know and love someone who turned out to be a police spy – which is substantiated by official documentation and has not been denied by police – will almost certainly lend weight to calls for a public inquiry, chaired by a judge, into the surveillance of protesters…

She adds: “The impression in the press was that this was an isolated incident, that it was a really ‘unusual thing’ – but this is not true. I know of multiple cases. We’re talking about a repeated pattern of long-term relationships and, for me at least, the deepest love I thought I’d ever known.”

Her story suggests the collateral damage from a decade-long operation to infiltrate the protest movement is wider than police chiefs had expected. She says the deception that predated their marriage in 2005, with profound consequences for her wellbeing and that of their children, made her feel “like a prostitute; just an unknowing and unpaid one”.

The love instinct, when triggered by a suitable mate who repeatedly triggers the appropriate neurological circuits, is one viewed so sacrosanct by most, that the idea of exploiting it for any material gain is seen as almost sacrilegious. Yet here was a full fledged spook who not only triggered love, he went on to marry, and even conceived children in his cover relationship. It is a potent cover, because every time you suspect you are being played, you go back to the extremeness of it, and conclude you must be wrong.

Notice, I highlight here Law Enforcement investigations, which are nothing, stakes-wise, compared to Cabal operations. Law enforcement officers don’t get life sentences in Gitmo if they fail to get intel. They have boundaries, and murder is off limits. No so with Cabal. A group of environmental protestors blocking a street, or even terrorist attacks (which it appears in some cases are allowed, if not actually perpetrated by the government), are nothing compared to the global conspiracy which is currently controlling world events.

If a rag-tag group of hippie environmentalists can see spooks infiltrating them using marriage and child conception, what do you think Cabal will do with a highly intelligent, fearless investigative reporter who might uncover a secret Cabal Operation? What will they do with people online who might expose operations, or even run for office one day?

Which brings us back to Q. “Watch the wives.” It has dawned on me that a daughter in a Cabal family may be the ultimate recruiting tool. If you identify a potential asset you may wish to run someday as a politician, or reporter, or even government executive, you send in the girl. You know how even a moderately attractive woman can manipulate men with a warm smile at the right time, or a wrist grab as she is talking. Now you are inside, and can take a much closer look. If he works out, have the girl marry him, and then recruit him into the fold. If not, she breaks up, and he will never be the wiser. There is a reason all these Cabalites are paired off together, and I think Q saying “Watch the wives” is intended as much as a little lesson in the tradecraft at this level, as it is a crumb to be followed to intelligence.

I will say I have, in my travels online, seen several instances where I think the partners of some are actually operating as more than potential mates. There are indices and quirks of history you begin to pick up on once you realize it is a tactic. I’m not going to get into naming names, because I have no inside intel, just suspicions built through experience. But if you are in the movement, keep in mind it is a tactic that is based off extremeness.

And that is why when I saw this with Facebook, it hit me in the face. Suppose you are a rising star in the movement. You log into your facebook account, and see their “Algorithm” has matched you with a young Raquel Welsh look-alike. You click on her profile, and she is MAGA to the core, a dog lover, and most importantly, she has an impressive collection of all the Assault Rifle varients you have been intending to add to your collection, with no duplications of any weapons you already own. And just as you finish reading her profile, she sends you a message saying she’d love to meet you at the next violent Antifa clash and go for some pizza after – she’ll be the one with a spiked baseball bat and steel toed boots.

Lo, you have toiled all these many years, and God has finally smiled down upon you.

Or has he?

Tell others about r/K Theory because you are either controlled or in control

This entry was posted in Cabal Inc., Conspiracy, Intel, ITZ, Politics, Q. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pitcrew
Pitcrew
6 years ago

Real men hunt. They are not “fed”.

LembradorDos6Trilliões
LembradorDos6Trilliões
6 years ago
Geoarrge
6 years ago

Most of the time, matching someone with one of their assets might be overkill. The Cabal families can only have so many daughters of their own, and beyond that, would have to rely on a rare breed of candidate– the sort of person with the professionalism, intelligence, and unscrupulousness that makes a good spy or elite criminal. I seriously doubt that enough of these people exist in the world for the Cabal to place them everywhere they would like.

Much of the time, that wife might actually be the genuine article, in the sense that she herself is innocent of any ulterior motives or conflicting loyalties, but the arrangement is engineered in order to ensure that there is something to threaten to exert leverage over the husband. You can’t really control someone with nothing to lose, so– give him something, it’s that simple.

lordofthehundreds
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
6 years ago

My issue with such assertions is that someone would have talked about what they were asked to do. Not everyone, of course, but maybe 2-4 pct? That’s enough females spilling the beans to alert the world that something funny is going on.

But then I think of the reach of the East German Stasi at the end of the SED regime, where 1 in every 63 East Germans were collaborators with the socialist secret state police.

It can’t be that friggin’ large in the United States. It can’t be, not with the reach of the Internet and human communications in a reasonable free country. We’d all know by now if it were so, and would have done the only logical thing free men can do: Reload, and keep reloading until no one said anything otherwise.

LembradorDos6Trilliões
LembradorDos6Trilliões
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
6 years ago

Shit, if they had more than 100 years to do this, they could had perfectly set up breeding farms.
Get one father and select 1000 mothers, then hire an army of asian nannies to raise them while using mind control on them to keep them on a leash and in 18-25 years you can comp 1000 people with wives, and with the amount of money and influence they have, they would probably be using tax money/slush funds to pay for all that shit.

Now instead of 1 father, imagine you have 10000.

10k x 1k = 10.000.000

Totally doable, if you can divert tax payer funds to your breeding program (easy if you have the whole IC comped, and blackmail on most the politicians).

They could even scale it further if they really wanted, and they have had the time to do something like this, easily.

SteveRogers42
SteveRogers42
6 years ago

Maybe I’m rayciss, but while I’m “watching the wives”, I have become guilty of noticing that many of these James Bond villains (Soros, Zuckerberg, McConnell) have Chinese – or other Asian – wives. Rupert Murdoch, of course, set the standard with an ex-wife who had “Intelligence operative” written all over her…written in hanzai, that is.

disenchantedscholar
Reply to  SteveRogers42
6 years ago

Milo, Cernovich: “she wouldn’t go away” he said, dumbly.
The tech guys constantly go to orgies, it’s more a paper marriage.
Asian currency union. Valley goes down, they can move to China.

disenchantedscholar
6 years ago

Spencer.
Women get targeted too. I’ve met men who seemed to fit info on me online, they tried to get to know me (I knew something was up), tried to fish for certain information (that I didn’t have) then disappeared. Totally, utterly disappeared. But FB is too obvious, this is taking heat off Tindr. I know guys who get weird matches to distract them from work stuff.
Men fall for this stuff easily. They’re quite dumb. Legally, I think it might count as rape, especially with falsified marriage documents.