Critics of visa liberalization fear that millions of Turkish nationals may end up migrating to Europe. The Austrian newsmagazine, Wochenblick, recently reported that 11 million Turks are living in poverty and “many of them are dreaming of moving to central Europe.”
Other analysts believe Erdo?an views the visa waiver as an opportunity to “export” Turkey’s “Kurdish Problem” to Germany. According to Bavarian Finance Minister Markus Söder, millions of Kurds are poised to take advantage of the visa waiver to flee to Germany to escape persecution at the hands of Erdo?an: “We are importing an internal Turkish conflict,” he warned. “In the end, fewer migrants may arrive by boat, but more will arrive by airplane.”
The European Union now finds itself in a Catch-22 situation. Turkey appears determined to flood Europe with migrants either way: with Europe’s permission by means of visa-free travel, or without Europe’s permission, as retribution for failing to provide visa-free travel…
German Development Minister Gerd Müller has echoed that warning:
“The biggest migration movements are still ahead: Africa’s population will double in the next decades. A country like Egypt will grow to 100 million people, Nigeria to 400 million. In our digital age with the internet and mobile phones, everyone knows about our prosperity and lifestyle.”
Müller added that only 10% of those currently on the move have reached Europe: “Eight to ten million migrants are still on the way.”
After this K-shift has completed, future K-strategists operating in a time of high K should recognize that the r-selected migration surge will precede a future K-shift. Knowing that, they should try to implement some sort of policy in their K-selected times that will curtail the migrant flood that is going to occur in the next turn of the cycle.
A good example of such foresight would be the Second Amendment, which has managed to protect the right to bear arms despite the immense r-pressures we have been enduring in the United States.
It also points out that the many of the more obvious successes and failures of the US Constitution revolve around how effectively its provisions are specifically designed to protect and further K-strategist urges. The Constitution was designed with an eye to limiting governmental power, which was the most direct expression of r the Founders observed. But it was not designed expressly to further the K-strategy, as r/K Theory was not know at the time of its drafting.
In areas like the Second Amendment, where the ability to maintain combativeness was directly protected, it was very effective. In economic areas, where it failed to directly address redistributive economic policies directly, it was less successful, and thus allowed a free descent into r-selected economic policies.
I strongly suspect that at some point a knowledge of r/K Theory will be used to produce the most lasting form of governance to date on our planet. All that will be required is the extraordinary K-selected impetus that will be produced by the Apocalypse, and a broader recognition of r/K Theory within the new right-wing intelligentsia.
The final form of government will be a government that is designed to foster K-selection among its people, and eradicate r-strategists.
Spread r/K Theory, because the migrant surge isn’t stopping until we Apocalypse
[…] Eight To Ten Million More Migrants Coming To Europe? […]
Interesting to consider this in terms of r/K. I like the example of the 2nd amendment. Another is the Wall.
Right now, a lot of people (even so-called conservatives) are saying, “We don’t need the wall anymore, because under Trump, immigration is way down.” To that, I say, “Sooner or later, another Obama-like idiot will become the president. And this future president will, once again, refuse to protect our borders. That’s why we need the wall.”
The wall, like the 2nd amendment, is something that could/should outlast Trump’s presidency.
Very True. When the Apocalypse hits, we may see a flood come across those borders, as well as raiders hitting border towns and heading back south into Mexico.
I have long felt aiding african and islamic countries where the the birth rate is greater than 5 per female is just sewing seeds of destruction for later. The kids grow up and the overpopulation gets worse, so naturally flow outwards. Should only aid with birth control in those places.
True. There will be a lot of pain there when the Apocalypse cuts the aid.
immensely Great website,
just been sharing it with fellow conservatives.
Please, address the issue of the extremely annoying difficulty of accesing the blog ( http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/home-page/ ) from the webpage( http://www.anonymousconservative.com/ )
thanks you for your efforts AC
Thank you for the help spreading it!
I’ll fix the main page tomorrow.
Someone else noticed eh?
Oh yes, and I concur, this blog is essential reading.
Thank you AC
Yes, when more people understand the r/K dynamics we can engineer better protections against the growth/influence of r-strategists. What a great change that would be from the current attempts to reason with these people and convince them of the error of their ways; ’cause that’s been sooooo effective. And no longer would those on the right be scratching their heads trying to figure out why the left acts the way they do.
I know listen to podcasts and continually scream, “it’s r strategy!”, when the “what the hell are these people thinking” comments are made. LOL Just another red pill. Maybe the ultimate one.
I love statements like this
“The biggest migration movements are still ahead: Africa’s population will double in the next decades. A country like Egypt will grow to 100 million people, Nigeria to 400 million. In our digital age with the internet and mobile phones, everyone knows about our prosperity and lifestyle.”
Only because to have that population growth requires food. Sure the numbers as currently projected show that these population levels are likely, but they aren’t pre determined. If the US goes to the crapper, where will the world get the food. We export a lot of grains.
It also doesn’t address that there are according the the lowest rate UN population projections from abotu 20 to 30 years ago missing people. That is our population is lower than expected, signifigantly. I think at this point the global population is about 100 to200 million below prior estimates, or maybe more.
Why? because r’s who don’t have to raise kids (through prevention means) won’t raise kids. They will prevent them. And it is a global phenomenon. Brazil 1960’s about 6 kids per woman in the 2000s I think it was close to 2 or even less per woman. I’m not sure how Africa is faring up. But I expect it will hit that same decrease soon.