From a Russian study on DRD4 7r:
Participants were 263 14- to 17-year olds (50% males) living in Russia. DNA was extracted from saliva samples and the VNTR DRD4 polymorphisms were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction. Participants reported on the extent of their delinquent behaviour, short temper, thrill seeking and exposure to psychosocial risk (i.e. poor parental monitoring of adolescent behaviour, exposure to violence and peer delinquency). Compared to individuals with the 4/4 genotype, males, but not females, with the 7-repeat allele (7R) had significantly higher delinquency, short temper and thrill seeking.
Now we know migrants are high in DRD4 7r:
We propose that this rapid migration into new habitats selected for individuals with low reactivity to novel stressors. Certain dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) polymorphisms are associated with low neuronal reactivity and increased exploratory behavior, novelty seeking, and risk taking, collectively considered novelty-seeking trait (NS). One previous report (Chen et al.: Evol Hum Behav 20 (1999) 309-324) demonstrated a correlation between migratory distance and the seven-repeat (7R) VNTR DRD4 allele at exon 3 for human populations… We retest the DRD4 exon 3 alleles, and also test two other loci near DRD4 that are associated with NS. We conclude there is an association between migratory distance and DRD4 exon 3 2R and 7R alleles that cannot be accounted for by neutral genetic processes alone.
This is because DRD4 is the genetic foundation of an r-selected reproductive strategy, and these migrants are in search of free resources. DRD4 7r is even associated with r-strategy traits such as promiscuity, infidelity, and high sex drive:
We administered an anonymous survey on personal history of sexual behavior and intimate relationships to 181 young adults. We also collected buccal wash samples and genotyped the DRD4 VNTR. Here we show that individuals with at least one 7-repeat allele (7R+) report a greater categorical rate of promiscuous sexual behavior (i.e., having ever had a “one-night stand”) and report a more than 50% increase in instances of sexual infidelity…
DRD4 VNTR genotype varies considerably within and among populations and has been subject to relatively recent, local selective pressures. Individual differences in sexual behavior are likely partially mediated by individual genetic variation in genes coding for motivation and reward in the brain. Conceptualizing these findings in terms of r/K selection theory suggests a mechanism for selective pressure for and against the 7R+ genotype that may explain the considerable global allelic variation for this polymorphism.
What do you get when you combine delinquency, criminality, short temper, thrill seeking, and high sex drive all together?
You get rapists, criminals, and savages with exaggerated senses of entitlement, and who rage at not being given everything they want. They are carefully designed to invade any noble K-selected populations whose leaders allow it, and spread their rapist dopamine receptor genes throughout the population through rape, and opportunistic criminal victimization. If the K-strategists up their defense quickly enough, they will not be as vulnerable since the rapists are only opportunists, not warriors. However, likely for this reason, the rapists will first focus on the relatively higher long form DRD4 carriers in the population, as they first seek to out-reproduce their host populations.
This study found that the 7 repeat allele of the DRD4 gene distinguished those individuals who have been victimized a single time from those who have been victimized more than once… The 7 repeat allele produces less efficient receptors and has been linked to attention related problems, novelty seeking, and conduct disorder… Because of its impact on these characteristics, DRD4 may be related to recurrent victimization because individuals may be less attuned to risk and likely to actually seek out novel or risky situations, perhaps even after being victimized.
Note the thread of amygdala damage and threat-blindness which runs through that analysis of this leftist-associated gene, even though the writer has obviously never heard of any of that.
Interestingly, this is further explanation for why we see idiot feminists who claim to abhor rape, but who desperately want to import the very refugees from violent lands where rape is normal. If these feminists are high DRD4 long-form carriers, they may actually be programmed, on a very deep level, to want to be raped, to perpetuate that rabbit trait to which they are a subconscious slave. It is literally as if it is a subconscious reproductive strategy, driving their behavior beneath their conscious mind’s awareness.
This doesn’t mean they enjoy the rape while it happens necessarily, or consciously decide to get themselves raped (although given their ardor for importing rapists, this might just be so). It means that deep down their brains are designed to fire off neurons in a specific way which will get them raped by violent men.
They are designed to want to import refugees with high long form DRD4 carriage, they are designed to prefer skimpy dress, they are designed to exhibit the type of psychological entitlement that expects to be able to dress skimpily around violent men known for rape and not get raped, and they are too threat-blind to realize that all of that will end with them being violently gang-raped. Not coincidentally, their gang rape will be performed by angry men who are themselves furthering the spread of their long form DRD4 genes. These men will be doing so in the very women who carry the exact same rapist-prone DRD4 alleles themselves. Note how this will further concentrate the r-selected rapist-prone long form alleles in their very-high-carriage, feminist-single-mom’d, rapist spawn.
None of that is good for the K-strategist girls who it is up to us to protect, as they try to navigate a world filled with leftist rapist-spawn seeking to contaminate their comparatively noble genes, and feminist rapee-wannabes who further the rape culture through their stupidity. Nor is it good for the noble K-strategy within our species.
I am continually amazed how much of the rabbit strategy can appear as if it is composed of sentient, controlling genes, which drive imbecile leftist meat-robots to spread its ignoble nature through our populace, often at the highest cost to the very idiots whose intellect and morals have been so thoroughly hijacked by this satanic gene.
Even more amazing is watching rabbit-robots decry specific evils, from rape to bloodshed, only to then engage in behaviors which not only ignore logic, but run exactly counter to it. All the while, they advance the very evils they decry, and oppose anyone who wants to stop them with a fury they unleash on nothing else – including the very evils which they claim to revile.
Here, not only do they import rapists. Not only do they engage in behaviors designed to help bear rapist children to spread the trait. As they do this, they proclaim no greater enemy than the right wing conservatives who are actually trying to keep the rapists out and avoid the bloodshed that the rabbits are so hell bent on producing.
Combined with idiot leaders who think their people have no claim of ownership on their own nation, and you will have bloodshed.
It is not to be feared.
[…] DRD4 7r – Why Middle Eastern Migrants In Europe Will Tend To Be Rapists And Criminals […]
[…] ADDED: Reality bites. […]
[…] http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/drd4-7r-why-middle-eastern-migrants-in-europe-will-tend-to… […]
I remember reading non-fiction Star Trek books as a kid in the early 70s… written by females. I knew even then incessant writing about “rape fantasies” and so-called “K/S” homosexual themes was messed up.
(Check out a discussion linked to my posting name.)
Recalled through the lens of r/K and it’s clear why Vox Day is the bete noir of the SFWA.
Yeah, the fan-fic side is filthy with degenerate slash and shipping fantasies. The fact that they’ve come up with euphemisms like slash and shipping rather than “fag fantasies” says quite a lot.
The Chen study you cited failed to account for neutral genetic processes that might create such a correlation in the absence of natural selection.
“We conclude there is an association between migratory distance and DRD4 exon 3 2R and 7R alleles that cannot be accounted for by neutral genetic processes alone.”
Correlation does not equal causation. One study alone does not prove anything, it just means there is a possible link. Moreover, the context of the study focused on how Homo sapiens took risks by leaving a designated area searching for sustenance and constructing shelter, which are survival instincts. If we are to take current immigrants who settle in a different environment, then we are looking specifically at these HOW they engage in risks when it comes to finding a job and a residence.
Your desperately are trying to extrapolate data to serve a political agenda. Are you a liberal by chance?
“This is because DRD4 is the genetic foundation of an r-selected reproductive strategy, and these migrants are in search of free resources. DRD4 7r is even associated with r-strategy traits such as promiscuity, infidelity, and high sex drive”
The study consisted of 181 young adults born in the United States, with 60% consisting of European ancestry. In order for YOUR conclusion to hold any water, the subjects had to be recent immigrants. Regardless, this study concludes there is a correlation. The authors make conclusions on the causes, but they acknowledge more research must be conducted to ascertain whether their generalizations, and findings, are able to be replicated.
“They are carefully designed to invade any noble K-selected populations whose leaders allow it, and spread their rapist dopamine receptor genes throughout the population through rape, and opportunistic criminal victimization.”
You just took the results of studies that offered correlational evidence, disregarded the explanations of the authors regarding the caveats of their research, and summarily chose to assume that immigrant males have these predispositions. You engage in pseudoscience. That is, you misinterpret genuine scientific literature and draw unsubstantiated conclusions.
“None of that is good for the K-strategist girls who it is up to us to protect, as they try to navigate a world filled with leftist rapist-spawn seeking to contaminate their comparatively noble genes, and feminist rapee-wannabes who further the rape culture through their stupidity. Nor is it good for the noble K-strategy within our species.”
First, do K-strategists, assuming they even exist, have the liberty to make their own decisions regarding who they associate with? Second, who empowered you to be the protector of all K-strategist girls?
I am assuming that you have several children of your own, by my account at least five. Have you fulfilled your reproductive requirements?
Three words, pea brain – Cologne migrant rape. Why don’t we see that often among normal Germans.
I hear “correlation does not equal causation” a lot from leftists when they do not like the direction a certain study is clearly pointing – usually as a last ditch defense to try and muddy the waters of a debate they feel threatened by. Of course the point of citing that was the correlation, not the causation, so you basically ceded my point – it is correlated. Migrants tend to be higher in DRD4 7r. People with high carriage tend to exhibit bad behaviors like delinquency and rape. I think the mentally challenged peons of the world will be able to do the math and get the idea even without knowing about novelty seeking and the 7r allele.
Which would lead to a prediction migrants would be more conduct disordered than the population they migrate to and more sexually aggressive, leading them to rape at a higher rate. Now let’s see, are they, in any way conduct disordered more than the average natives? (Thank you Xeno Systems, one of the most interesting blogs out there, for the link).
Seriously, don’t waste time arguing here, when the entire migrant population is about to make you look like a tool, even with the media trying to cover for them. It’s just a waste of time.
Great write-up, AC. This reminds me of something I read in “Völkerpsychologie” by german anthropolgist Andreas Vonderach. He cites a study[0] after which the MAOA-2R allele[1] has an occurrence of about 15% in the arab population. In contrast, Europeans have an occurrence of about 0.1% to 0.5%. It shows how incompatible these people are with western society.
[0]: http://adhdnet.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/El-Tarras-2012-Association-study-betwee.pdf
[1]: The press called it “warrior gene”.
I am offer cogent points that you merely whisked away with rhetoric. I am assuredly not threatened by your pseudoscience. There was ONE study conducted that wanted to determine whether there was a correlation involving higher dopamine levels with risk taking. The authors duly noted they had to engage in further testing to confirm their findings. More importantly, the scientists did not operationally define risk taking, nor even include “sexual aggression” anywhere in their study, nor suggest that migrants are more likely to commit rape. The focus of the research was determining if there was link. Nothing more, nothing less. YOU are jumping the gun here by suggesting there is a cause when it has yet to be definitively established.
In order for this study to be validated, it must be replicated. That is, there must be additional research. THEN AND ONLY THEN can the claim “migrants tend to be higher in DRD4 7r” be used in the next step–hypothesizing that migrants are more likely to commit crimes of a sexual nature.
What you are doing is ASSUMING that migrants, specifically Muslims, rape at a higher rate, without even developing a study based on the hypothesis. You are committing fraud.
“Which would lead to a prediction migrants would be more conduct disordered than the population they migrate to and more sexually aggressive, leading them to rape at a higher rate.”
You have to test this claim. It is merely speculation on your part. You are extrapolating data to fit your worldview. I implore you to read Vox Day regarding the difference between scientody and scientistry.
Again, do K-strategists, assuming they even exist, have the liberty to make their own decisions regarding who they associate with? Second, who empowered you to be the protector of all K-strategist girls? Do you have five to eight children minimum? Are you positively contributing to the gene pool?
Yes, because I did not give any relevant statistic in my previous reply that would serve as a test. Nor is this evidence. Nor is this. Nor is the fact that Cologne has had New Years Celebrations with no major offenses, but they take in 2000 migrants and suddenly they have a 1000 strong mob of migrants rampaging and literally stripping girls naked, and raping girls in the open, on the street.
It is really funny. 100% of rapes in Norway by migrants, 20 percent of rapes in Sweden done by the 2% of Muslim migrants. 95% of molestations in Britain by migrants. 50% of the migrants in cologne go on a 1000 person strong mass rape spree openly, right on the streets.
According to you no linkage at all is established, and nobody can draw any conclusion, because academia hasn’t produced a specific study showing causation. Do you realize what an imbecile you sound like? Do you think anybody will listen to a word you say, when you sound that stupid? Note, the AMA gives decisive medical guidance based on science that is not nearly as clearly indicative as what we are looking at every day now in Europe, and I’ll bet you’d tell me to follow it, if asked.
Look, no offense, but if things went Darwinian right now I’d be betting on your demise – not because you are helpless, weak, impotent, and ineffectual, though I have no doubt you are, but because you seem to lack the intelligence to pick up on trends and see where things point. That will get you killed.
My guess is you have a history in childhood of being victimized by the strong, so that is why you are closing your eyes to the return of that world, and hoping it will all go away. It isn’t going to, based on what I am looking at. You’re going to be right back in that helpless situation again, the way things are heading, and nobody is going to be there to protect you.
You do realize the world is about to become “might makes right,” in ways that even aggressive people like me only dream of, and you will probably not survive? And that will be precisely because you are not smart enough to survive in a state of nature, or figure out how to avoid creating that world yourself? I would find all of that terrifying if I were you. I would also find it embarrassing.
You did, by being, in a very real sense, wholly helpless to stop me, and too ineffectual or intelligent to do it yourself. The apocalypse is coming. China is quaking, US stocks are shuddering, the debt is catching up to us, and violent Muslims are invading, setting up a clash of civilizations, right as the economic free money machine crashes and burns. Within your lifetime you will be cowering and hiding in a cramped space, struggling to stay utterly silent, as loud noises bang and rattle outside around you. During that silence, you will be forced to confront your own inability to control things around you, and the terror of what lies just outside.
I wouldn’t make any long term plans.
lmao OUCH!
I look forward to the day where not only to we put a hard cap on immigration to say, .1% of the population, per annum, but swathes of immigrants can be dismissed out of hand and marked for permanent denial of entry with little more than a cottonswob in the cheek.
What it really is is the “violent criminal” gene. It has no predictive factor on how well someone will do in a battle, but it is HIGHLY predictive of whether or not that person will criminally stab or shoot someone.
“Yes, because I did not give any relevant statistic in my previous reply that would serve as a test. Nor is this evidence. Nor is this. Nor is the fact that Cologne has had New Years Celebrations with no major offenses, but they take in 2000 migrants and suddenly they have a 1000 strong mob of migrants rampaging and literally stripping girls naked, and raping girls in the open, on the street.”
You are offering SOCIAL evidence for a phenomenon that in reality requires first BIOLOGICAL evidence—then one is able to offer insight into the corresponding sociological implications. Merely stating that a subgroup of a people are actually higher in DRD4 7r without testing if it be the case is pseudoscience.
**In order to prove your hypothesis, you would need to study that group by taking a sample of the offenders, create a survey similar to the one employed by the researchers (but also include questions about sexual behaviors), draw buccal wash samples from the people involved in the study, number crunch, and draw conclusions.**
Even if it is proven that Muslim men in this specific case are more likely to react aggressively, one could argue that ALL men, regardless of ethnicity or race, will act in this manner who have this propensity. Therefore, one cannot make the generalization that it Muslim men are more likely than non-Muslim men because all men with this “condition” (for a lack of a better them) fall under this description.
In one of the links you provided, the researchers note that “genes in and of themselves do not cause criminal behavior, but rather influence how a person responds to their environment”. Moreover, the researchers “never heard” of a “leftist-associated gene” because this phenomenon—if this even exists—was completely irrelevant to their research. Their study was exclusively focusing on how migrants handle their new environment and whether they are more or less willing to “take chances” to address their basic needs. The study makes no direct references as labeling “risky situations” as being sexual in nature. That would require a separate, distinct investigation, as noted**.
One more time…you have to demonstrate scientifically that “Muzzie” men are more prone to violence as a result of higher levels of dopamine specifically due to their risk taking endeavors which are of a sexual nature as a result of migrating. YOU, and you alone, have chosen to take their study and dress it up in such a matter as to show there is an explicit relationship when no relationship has been observably established.
You are no better, and no worse, than those “scientists” who cook up the books and extrapolate data to “prove” that global warming exists.
“According to you no linkage at all is established, and nobody can draw any conclusion, because academia hasn’t produced a specific study showing causation.”
You can speculate there is a linkage. You can draw any conclusion that you want. Call out Muzzie men as rapists and barbarians and any other term you like.
My bone of contention is that your speculations and conclusions lack SCIENTIFIC MERIT if you are willfully refusing to thoroughly demonstrate and conclusively prove your hypothesis using the scientific method rather than pseudoscience while completely separating those findings from your socio-political agenda.
“the AMA gives decisive medical guidance based on science that is not nearly as clearly indicative as what we are looking at every day now in Europe, and I’ll bet you’d tell me to follow it, if asked.”
You can do a better job of erecting a strawman.
“Look, no offense, but if things went Darwinian right now I’d be betting on your demise – not because you are helpless, weak, impotent, and ineffectual, though I have no doubt you are, but because you seem to lack the intelligence to pick up on trends and see where things point. That will get you killed.”
You are employing rhetoric when the conversation here requires dialectic. One cannot make the claim regarding my apparent inferiority without having the requisite information at their disposal. I understand your Alinsky tactic employed because I am highlighting flaws in your argument, and the only apparent solution on your part is to engage in character assassination.
“Within your lifetime you will be cowering and hiding in a cramped space, struggling to stay utterly silent, as loud noises bang and rattle outside around you.”
You are no different than an SJW who, when confronted with an alternative point of view, resorts to outlandish comments, rather than substantive conversation. Employ dialect, not rhetoric.
You remind me of Berkeley, who proposed that empiricism is worthless, because the link between observation and conclusion was too ephemeral to measure. It would bother me, but I have seen how environmental researchers who find some highly profitable product harmful go through the same bullshit with industry funded researchers whose entire business model is based on muddying the waters with minutia.
I employ dialect if I am debating someone who isn’t full of shit, just like I only reason with the reasonable. I also don’t debate sluts, girls who had abortions, or women who decent men won’t marry. If you can’t bribe a guy with sex to put up with your shit on a long term basis, why would I do it for free? Alternately if you could make an argument that 7r wasn’t clearly accepted in the literature as a migrant gene, then I would debate. You can’t.
“You are offering SOCIAL evidence for a phenomenon that in reality requires first BIOLOGICAL evidence”
You have biological evidence which shows 7r is a migrant gene, as well as crime stats showing elevated rape and delinquency produced by migrants, which is even more valuable – and a 7r associated trait, BTW. If you have a problem with the studies, which are far more numerous than I cited, and promote a premise that is accepted widely, then take it up with the researchers and medline. Better yet, hit medline, hunt down all the migrant-7r studies, track down all the researchers, and email to tell them migration isn’t clearly associated with 7r, or novelty seeking, and they shouldn’t be saying it is in articles with popular culture magazines, where some have actually called 7r the “migrant gene.” If you want to say the linkage in Europe between migrants, rapes, crime, and the search for free resources is all unrelated chance, fine, but you look like a tool splitting imaginary hairs because you don’t like where things are pointing.
No offense toots, but playing this game with you would be a waste of time I can better spend elsewhere, even if I cared what your opinion was.
[…] * FEMEN, explained. […]
“I employ dialect if I am debating someone who isn’t full of shit, just like I only reason with the reasonable.”
That’s rich considering you were the one to “reason” that I will not survive in the upcoming apocalypse considering my supposed inferior intelligence, even though you lack substantive background knowledge about me to make that assertion.
“Alternately if you could make an argument that 7r wasn’t clearly accepted in the literature as a migrant gene, then I would debate.”
Except I never made the argument that 7r is NOT a migrant gene. I am disputing a specific generalization you are making.
Kenneth Kidd, on the other hand, duly notes that 7R’s link with migratory traits is countered by other studies contradicting it. He argues that reducing something as complex as human exploration to a single gene, well, genetics does not work in that manner. Groups of genes, he states, could lay the foundation for such behavior, but no one gene or set of genes can hardwire us for exploration or the results of our exploration.
“You have biological evidence which shows 7r is a migrant gene, as well as crime stats showing elevated rape and delinquency produced by migrants…”
Except you have not the requisite SCIENTIFIC studies to back up your claim! Again, if you insist that migrants are linked to rape and delinquency through 7r, then offer up a study on this particular matter.
More importantly, it would be ALL migrants, past and present, white and non-white, Christian and non-Christian, NOT a specific sub-group, if you believe 7r is a migrant gene that leads to “uncivilized behaviors”. Are you prepared to modify your SOCIAL generalization?
“If you have a problem with the studies, which are far more numerous than I cited, and promote a premise that is accepted widely, then take it up with the researchers and medline.”
I never stated I had any problem with their studies, I have a problem with you taking their results and infusing your socio-political agenda exactly like the SJW’s.
“and email to tell them migration isn’t clearly associated with 7r, or novelty seeking, and they shouldn’t be saying it is in articles with popular culture magazines, where some have actually called 7r the “migrant gene.” Note how you are going back to a claim that I never made, as if repeating it over and over again is going to magically strengthen your own argument.
Demonstrate scientifically that “Muzzie” men are more prone to violence as a result of higher levels of dopamine specifically due to their risk taking endeavors which are of a sexual nature as a result of migrating.
[…] Though some think that even the best propaganda effort in this stead is a fool’s errand, because science. […]