Here are two video examples of domestic surveillance tracking ballot box stuffers in the 2020 election. Note, this surveillance operation has been around for decades at least, and freely allowed our nation’s elections to be fully rigged, and offered no pushback for all of that time. So this is not a criminal investigation to prevent election-rigging. In my opinion, having seen this from the time I was a child, and especially since I began this foray into politics, this is merely the intelligence operation which rigs our elections, monitoring its peons as they go about carrying out its criminal orders.
Video one:
This is what stuffing the ballot box looks like pic.twitter.com/okpcKa9O4c
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) April 11, 2022
Notice in the top video above, there is no activity at the site immediately prior to the arrival of the ballot stuffer. You have 17 seconds of activity, until the moment he reaches the drop box, and at that exact moment an SUV backs out of a parking space in a perfect position to observe and covertly record his act. Simultaneously, a woman just happens to turn the corner, right next to him. At 22 seconds, as he was supposed to be dropping the ballots (had he not been flummoxed by the dropbox’s design, another couple appears at the bottom of the screen, again covering his act from the other side, as the SUV pauses to slowly turn around on the far side of him, loitering during his act, and the lone female walker is positioned right behind him. Notice he has three surveillance units covering all three exposed sides at the critical moment he is dropping the ballots. This will be significant in the next video.
Timing and coincidence is the only way to spot modern surveillance operations. There are too many surveillance people now recruited in the local civilian population as junior surveilllants/informants to spot faces or vehicles over Time/Environment/Distance as was previously taught. This operation is mammoth, and you can only spot it by the perfect coincidences in timing that it will choreograph with target movements.
The white SUV pauses as long as it credibly can, before slowly driving away, and at 35 seconds you will see the driver’s window is open, a feature of vehicular surveillance procedure that wee have long noted on our website, and which I personally see all the time. It allows the surveillance driver to listen as well as observe, and thus provide a fuller record of what was noted in the target vicinity. Just as that SUV is forced to leave, yet another vehicle rolls into the scene to capture the remainder of the act, as yet one more pedestrian shows up.
Note, there was absolutely no activity at that site prior to the target’s arrival. But within moments of his arrival suddenly that ballot box was a hive of activity, all perfectly timed and positioned to record and document his act. That is what surveillance looks like.
And yet it is obviously not surveillance being run by any sort of law enforcement organization as we still ended up saddled with Joe Biden in a fully rigged election, and our nation is still being bled dry and destroyed, almost certainly by the very intelligence operation running that surveillance.
Notice also, the second video above features no such surveillance. My guess is if you knew who the second ballot-stuffer is, he is a higher-ranking member of the organization, who had proven himself in the past. Whereas the first guy was flummoxed by the ballot-dropbox, because this was his first time doing this, the second guy had no such problems, and even knew already he could not put all the ballots in at once. I would assume the surveillance is working to confirm its new hires are committing the crimes they have promised to commit, and they are not promising crimes, claiming to have done them, but in reality shirking the actual crimes and risks inherent to them.
Video Two:
THE MOST SECURE ELECTION IN HISTORY
Here’s a woman stuffing the ballot box in broad daylight in Gwinnett County, Georgia in the November 2020 Election pic.twitter.com/sqUfuONfGP
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) April 11, 2022
In the beginning of the video, the woman in the upper left, walking diagonally is likely foot surveillance. She is part of the team tracking the black woman approaching the curb, who will go on to be the focus of the video as she stuffs the ballot-box.
At seven seconds, just as the black woman approaches the ropes around the drop box, a new woman is walking along the bottom of the screen, she turns, and continues to walk a perimeter line around the target, reaching perfectly behind her as she is about to drop the ballots.
At that exact moment, at 14 seconds, as she begins dropping ballots, again, a vehicle has backed out of the exact same parking spot as above, once again perfectly positioned to record the act on hidden video cameras installed in vehicular surveillance units to record out all four sides of the car, and probably transmit the video to a central control center.
At 16 seconds, two more foot surveillance emerge at the bottom of the screen, with ballots, to drop them in the dropbox themselves, giving them a perfect cover for approaching the box and loitering through the duration of this woman’s ballot-stuffing. Note how they purposely walk on the wrong side of the ropeline, so as to be positioned to the woman’s right, and not be stuck behind her. It even gives them a cover for loitering to her right, as they realize they accidently walked on thee wrong side of the rope, and need to wait there. Again, perfect timing, and positioning, so that at the very moment she is about to drop her ballots, at 18 seconds, there is one surveillance unit to her left, one to her right, and one directly behind her. In the video it appears there was no such activity around this box in the moments leading up to her approach, or after she left.
I would also highlight the second couple in line, and specifically the older man in the ball cap. At two seconds, he glances back just as the black woman steps up on the curb. At 19 seconds, just as she is opening the dropbox, he again looks over his shoulder at her. He looks back again at 29 seconds as she is finishing, and then puts his hand up to his face as he tilts his chin down into his chest, either as a signal, or more likely to mask any movement of his lips under his mask as he says something into a chest mic. He looks back again at 42 seconds as she begins to depart, and gives her one more look at 49 seconds just as she is about to step off the curb onto the blacktop. He was the static unit posted in the line, as a backup to all the mobile units moving around the target. I assume he had a hidden sub-aural earpiece, and was hearing the woman’s progress called out in his head by the central control center, which was how he knew just when to look back at each critical moment.
Again, surveillance tries to look like normal activity. So even when you see it, it is nearly impossible to tease out of the background activity simply by its appearance. Any one of these actors could have happened to do all of these things at the exact right moment. But the chances of them all doing all of these things, so precisely, is very small unless they were a coordinated unit. And of course the chance becomes even smaller when you notice it appears there was no such activity just prior to her arrival, and no such activity immediately after. There was not a steady chain of such coincidences common to that spot, but rather they began just as she arrived, and ended after she left.
I think this is what is behind the “Red Shirt” phenomenon in gangstalking. Those who fall victim to this domestic surveillance operation often note it creates obvious coincidences, like everyone involved wearing a red shirt, or driving a blue car. One theory is they want to traumatize victims, and cause them to be triggered by the color red, or some sound the “gangstalkers” make. In reality, gangstalking is just the local surveillance operation, and I think those coincidences are distractions. they are designed to prevent the target from noting these more subtle coincidences which are the only real way to perform surveillance detection these days.
A target focused on the coincidence that all his followers wore red shirts and hats, is a target who cannot focus on these smaller coincidences, or educate others to observe them, as a way of making our society more surveillance aware, and hastening the exposure and destruction of this grossly unconstitutional and unamerican operation. If you are a victim of this, don’t fall for that trick.
I will close by noting I never received any formal training in this subject. I recognize all of this because since I began this site, and now this stuff follows me everywhere I go. This is the leading edge of the criminal conspiracy which has subverted our government, and which is trying to destroy our nation. It is the shark’s fin above the water, the tip of the iceberg.
But it is also the secret that the conspirators will not and cannot talk about. Anybody who claims to want to fight this conspiracy, from political corruption to lection-rigging, and who9 claims to want to restore a Constitutionalist government to this country, who will not at least mention the possibility of this surveillance, is a part of the conspiracy. It is the one thing conspirators are outright forbidden to talk about.
As a result, discussion of this subject is the single best way to separate the controlled opposition that wants to lead our movement astray, from the real Americans who are fighting for right.
I recommend everyone use this subject and discussion of it to separate friend from foe. You may be surprised how many who you think are on our side, will know what you are talking about, and outright refuse to discuss it, or even ridicule anyone who does.
They are the enemy.
I have been doing this with increasing frequency. All my friends kind of laugh at it, but I know, they know, that I know things & am frequently correct with my commentary & observations. All I say is Domestic 👏🏻Surveillance 👏🏻 Network when I think I see weird things.
I am currently traveling back to my hometown (from which I moved right before COVID). I am now so astute, I have noticed several odd poles close to intersections (which are already wired with traffic cameras anyway) with what I am assuming are monitoring devices. I keep pointing them out to my husband & yelling Domestic Surveillance. 🤪
The red shirt phenomenon seems to be a very obvious way of screaming, “Hey, I’m involved in watching you!”. At least in my experience. They want you to see them. I even had a boss who was always good to me and then one day changed his attitude in a subtle way, a day he wore a raggedy red t-shirt unlike anything he’d normally wear. Later occurrences made it clear he was making me feel unwanted and indicating I should look for a different job.
I always wondered what that was about. I’m pretty sure that surveillance tracked down where I was working and then he was essentially pressured by the local mafia to make sure I’d feel uncomfortable and leave on my own accord, but to have an inkling that my gangstalkers had been in contact with him.
It’s so hard to tell because gaslighting is inherent in all of their moves and they never, ever fess up.
I think it is supposed to be sensory overload. Probably in part it jacks up the target even more, like honking horns and glaring obviously, and talking into wrists, which is all psyop which they never do in real surveillance. But all of that also makes you stupid when it comes to how real surveillance works, and that prevents you from being a source of info for others on how to weaken this evil, corrupt operation to subvert the nation, which is all it is at this point. I mean you go to a gangstalking website, and what is described is ten people walking in a line, in bright red shirts, talking into their wrists, as a line of all blue cars drives down the street super slow. The gangstalkee can relate all of that, and it does zero damage to the surveillance teams real methods and operational control when they go covert, and it makes the gangstalkee look crazy, because normies think that could never happen in America because it is so ridiculous.
Doesn’t all this surveillance stuff have an expiry date?
https://www.demilked.com/facial-recognition-photography-your-face-is-big-data-egor-tsvetkov/
That was more than five years ago, done by one guy with no budget. What’s stopping anyone from developing an open source database linking everyone with a digital footprint? Then you could just go about your day with your smartphone camera on, and a basic analysis will yield that an unusual number of people you crossed paths with are from the same small liberal arts college, Serbian, ex-military, whatever.
Democratization of it will be its downfall.
Another element of the red shirt thing is that I think it is sometimes just an artifact of how that cell is organized — like how the directors in the NY subway shooting were wearing red, so the actors knew who to follow and take direction from.
I think that if all the team is wearing red shirts, it’s likely because it is an impromptu team that doesn’t know each other and have never met before this run, so the organizer told them, “wear a red shirt, the other people in red shirts are the rest of the team. Just do the normal job once you know who everyone is.”
Also note the man in the light colored baseball cap in line, positioned directly behind the target. He blatantly stares at her the entire time she is at the ballot box, to the point where he does not move forward with the line. Possible “red shirt,” to distract her from the more subtle surveillance in case she turns around to see if anyone is watching her? He also seems to give some sort of acknowledgment to the older couple surveillance waiting to deposit their ballots.
I noticed the surveillance in my life more than a decade ago. But it never occurred to me that it was human in origin. I honestly thought it must be God trying to send me a message somehow, because who else could orchestrate normally rare events to occur with such noticeably high frequency? And what would be the point of spying on a nobody like me?
After finding your series of articles, I feel horrible about blaming it on God all these years, and have prayed multiple apologies to Him.
The signal I see most often is the cars. When I am a pedestrian, they come through never-busy alleys at the exact moment I am trying to cross the alley. Or, when I am walking on a long, strait road (that’s never busy) for half a mile, and I see not one car. Then as I approach the only roundabout (where I must cross) a car arrives. Always at the roundabout. Never got hit, but the cars are always always always close enough that I get uncertainty about the crossing. And it occurs time after time after time exactly like this. Or, when I am driving in my own car, they ignore stop signs in a rush to pull out in front of me, then drive very slowly. Things of this nature. Psy-op stuff.
After reading your posts on this topic, I thought maybe they’d stop for a while. Instead, they had a big operation set up when I left church Sunday evening. I parked far far away from the door (and other cars), at the end of the parking lot. When I came out, cabal blue sedan parked just behind my car, facing the exit, with lights on (directly at me). Tinted windows, couldn’t see the driver. But I still stared at the driver’s window for a couple of seconds anyway, before driving off. He/she followed me so I made a random left turn down an obscure residential street. A street that just “happened” to have a car coming from the opposite direction, and then, near the next intersection, a car parked in front of the corner(!) house pulled right in front of me just as I was about to pass it.
The first I ever noticed it, though, was 15 years ago when working at a major DOD contractor. Our team walked to the cafeteria for lunch most days, and close to the cafeteria there was a large foyer which always had people standing around talking. Whenever I was on the edge of the group, people who were supposedly in conversations would often step backwards (right into my path). Without looking. My office mate even noticed it and once said “That happens to you a lot.” It didn’t happen to him or the other guys in the group. And when the Great Recession hit, I was the one who got laid off. None of the others.
I am sorry you have it on you. My impression is they are all diverse, and invariably people in it will like you and others will decide they don’t like you, and they just do whatever they like based on that. I have had times back a few years ago, where felt almost like I could tell who was on duty day to day.
It is what it is for now. But it seems the awakening is heading only one way. Nobody sees it, and then forgets it is there, or gets convinced it is not there and they were wrong. Sooner or later it will go mainstream.
If you can believe the research, all we need to do is convince 10% of the population, and then it will inevitably be seen by everyone. And once it is, that will be it. We will either see it dismantled very publicly and fully exposed, or there will be a Civil War, and we will either be rid of it, or it will have to try to rule in the open, which I just don’t see happening.
We are doing what we can here, but we can always use advocates to help push the ideas in their own circles of friends and families. Anybody out there who wants to help, just has to say the idea is interesting to others, and point them to our surveillance page.
AC, have you ever convinced anyone in person? In other words, if you talked to someone and convinced them, without them seeing this website, how did you do it? I am terrible at convincing people to change their minds on stuff.
You need a video. They need to see something with their own eyes. If you can pull out your phone, and show them something unmistakable, it will quickly shock their brain, or in affect psychology “startle.” Startle is how you put the brain into essentially neutral, where the old patterns of thought shut down temporarily, the person has trouble processing, and the brain enters a mode where it will accept new data and write over the old patterns. These things are almost like engineering the programming of a computer, using deeply evolved, fairly standardized systems.
No startle, the brain will be very hard to reprogram, and will continue to do what it has always done, for obvious reasons if you look at it evolutionarily. A startled human needs to understand how the startle happened, why it was unexpected, and how to avoid it in the future.
If you are under coverage, and you record video everywhere, all around your house, out all four sides of your car, with video sunglasses, you will eventually get something startling. I can actually go back now like nine years, and show you every single grocery shopping outing from 4 sides out my car, and from my perspective, and it is all organized by date and stores visited in the hard drives.
If you need to, pick the most startling video from my site, and download it to your phone. The surveillance is a great topic to trigger reprogramming, because it is inherently threatening, and startling. It might be tougher if the subject was cartoon characters, or delicious food. But a conspiracy of people living all around you, who have dedicated their lives to targeting you and your kids, in support of a conspiracy which is literally destroying the civilized world as quickly and violently as it can? All you need is a little evidence of that to startle. And then you can begin inputting new information and reprogramming.
OK, thanks for that. It ALSO explains why advertisements try to shock and startle. They’re trying to hack our brains.
But I should add, just point people to the surveillance page. It was designed to maximally shock people with undeniable evidence. It is tough in a simple conversation to inflict as much shock as that page has been designed to deliver.
You can even keep your hands clean to an extent, by couching it as a wild theory, which you find interesting, without fully committing to it yourself.
AC, just curious if you have any ideas why people like us figured it out on our own, but most people can’t?
I’d love to say I was brighter, but the reality is I would still not believe it possible had they not come out in force and sought to intimidate me into submission. I saw it everywhere. I kept thinking to myself, this is weird, that is weird. But I would never have believed such a thing could exist, I would never have believed so many would be a part of it, without spending years of it openly flaunting itself in front of me, day in and day out. I mean, Sept 11th was unimaginable if it was terrorists, and we missed it. But you are telling me one in ten of the people in the country, including kids, and probably most of the people I saw every day, knew their operation at the least allowed that, and they are still showing up to support the operation, and keeping the secret? I still cannot believe it, and I know for a fact it is true.
A part of me wonders too, if they did that to derail me even more. I mean look at me, trapped here, unwilling to let it go. The amount of effort I spend here, what would I be doing with my life if I hadn’t gotten trapped here? I don’t know.
The rest of you, maybe you were shown this to derail you, or maybe you are somehow outside the box thinkers who could break free of the programming. I do not know.
“A part of me wonders too, if they did that to derail me even more.”
That’s what I thought about phelps’ comment trying to get me to believe the moon landings were faked. People who go around saying such things are automatically assumed (by normie) to be nutjobs. (Self-discrediting.)
I did have my IQ tested a long time ago: 144, which puts me in a very high percentile, 99.7. Also I have a PhD in physics. Either one of these things make me an outlier; having both makes me an extreme outlier. My education and experience, which includes probability and statistics, is something very few people possess. That’s why the gangstalking activity stands out like a sore thumb to me. But I still never attributed it to a coordinated human conspiracy until I found your website.
BTW, I have a lower estimate on the % of the population needed to pull this off. Maybe 1~3%, but that’s still 3.3 to 10 million people in the US alone. And they never talk, never give away the secret. Which is an exceedingly sinister sign.
Agree on the ominous part. The only way I see them effectively keeping the secret, even the kids, is if they view everyone else as some diehard form of “other,” with whom they are directly opposed, in complete conflict, on a very deep level, in some form. Seeing themselves as British infiltrators, and everyone else as American could fit. Or some sort of religious adherence, with everyone else non-believers. A cult-thing could fit. Or even outright servitude to actual demons/aliens/others could fit. But there has to be some reason, some barrier, which means nobody can ever say anything to anyone else.
But I just don’t see some simple membership is some cool kids club of secret spies being kept secret, especially by the kids. Sooner or later somebody would brag, or share the video of the hot couple down the street fucking on their wedding night, or warn somebody they liked they were being set up, or something.
The only other possibility is they managed to MK Ultra shrinks into becoming MK Ultra-replicators, who would without thinking, covertly MK Ultra everyone they came in contact with, and all of the gangstalkers are people who at some point sought counselling, agreed to be hypnotized to fix some psychological issue like depression, and got programmed, and then they end up bringing their kids in to be programmed, while under in a trance thing. Given how far MK Ultra went, I couldn’t rule it out. Maybe TIs are people who just don’t program well, and they put them under because they worry they have no control of them.
But I just don’t see regular Americans knowing all that these people know, especially after they watched the Twin Towers fall and all those cops and firefighters get killed, and then all the wars and genuinely the best America had getting killed and maimed for nothing, and just keeping the secret, and heading out each day to follow regular schmoes around the grocery store.
On the moon thing, you get to a point where you realize this thing seems to get off on doing bigger and bigger lies, and making everyone believe them. I hold it out as possible it was all fake, just because I look back on my life, and see so much that was fake.
“I hold it out as possible it was all fake, just because I look back on my life, and see so much that was fake.”
Well, I’ve had the same experience – realizing we’ve been lied to all of our lives. My default setting now is to doubt everything I’m told by TPTB.
Bu notice my reply was carefully worded. If you read closely, I didn’t deny phelps’ claim. I said that if you go around saying such things you will discredit yourself.
The good news on the moon landing fakery is that it doesn’t matter. Even if it did at the time, we haven’t admitted to going back for fiddy years.
None of it matters compared to your soul. If you aren’t a believer I recommend The Story of the Cosmos edited by Gould and Ray. I’m friends with one of the authors (don’t want to dox myself by saying which one.)
“The good news on the moon landing fakery is that it doesn’t matter.”
Exactly. It’s not really relevant to my life. And there’s nothing wrong with being skeptical about everything, especially everything coming from our government.
“…That’s what I thought about phelps’ comment trying to get me to believe the moon landings were faked…”
I think phelps is wrong and being fooled because he has not thought enough about it or does not have enough technical background. He has made up his mind and will not change it.
“…People who go around saying such things are automatically assumed (by normie) to be nutjobs. (Self-discrediting.)…”
phelps gets mad at me because he thinks that I think this about him. NO. I think phelps is much smarter than me but, but not on this subject. He’s not because he’s been fooled.
The reason I go on about this is that I think the whole “fake moon landing” op is nothing but a huge gaslighting attempt by the Jews to demoralize and degrade White people by the Jews. They do this all the time. All this “fake moon landing” stuff was started by the Jews.
Think of the op that has gone on for decades where the Jews blame Whites in total for slavery and then look at the fact that 40% of Jews owned slaves, while only 0.35% of Whites owned slaves. That the vast majority of slaves were bought to the new world by Jews. They spend decades blaming us for their actions.
I’m sick of these ops to demoralize Whites. I heard this all my life and I’m done with hearing anything they say.
Before you take phelps word on the moon landings were fake look at the facts. phelps says,
“…You should be able to see stars, certainly in the film originals…”.
See what phelps said about stars not visible on the moon photos and my reply. The basic idea is, in the city with bright lights you can hardly, if at all, see stars. Yet you can clearly see the moon. And the moons light is only that small proportion that is reflected directly towards the earth. So on the moon the light would be much brighter. Now how are you going to see stars in film, with a far lower bandwidth than the human eye, if you can’t see stars in the city, on earth, and you are on the moon where the reflected light from trillions of cut and melted grain particles is about?
https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/news-briefs-02-02-2022/#comment-384577
This sort of nonsense goes on and on with the Jews and if they are caught they change the subject, and then later come back with the exact same false arguments that were proven wrong before.
Here’s another. They say the LEM with its thin skin could not hold the pressure. Wrong. A normal soda can holds 40psi at room temperature, and the LEM was half again the thickness and had ribs all over it, in addition to the skin. In addition, the pressure of the LEM was only around 5 psi. So the Jews are just lying or more accurately they are gaslighting. Using limited facts and then using those to deceive. Just about every single thing they say has some element of deception in it or tied to it. You see this constantly.
https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-3359f9e1742c24e608456d2b4042142c-pjlq
https://www.quora.com/Could-an-Apollo-astronaut-have-put-their-foot-through-the-hull-of-the-LEM
Thy also constantly say the thin heat reflecting foil on the outside shows it was thin and had no strength but as you can see from the above photo there was much more substantial structure under the foil which was only there to deflect heat. More gaslighting.
Here’s another. They say there should be some huge crater where the landing engine blew out a hole but the pressure was not that high. First the plume spread out in vacuum very far. See this picture of a rocket in partial vacuum.
I added up the pressure based on the pressure of the rocket motor of the LEM at the highest. This means right at the end of the bell housing, and it comes to somewhere around 550 pounds per square foot. Way less than the pressure of someone walking. Notice this is right at the end of the nozzle so the actual pressure would be way, way, way less. They also cut the motors off around three feet above the ground when the landing leg sensors touched. It’s just all lies. I could go on for days on all the little lies they use to confuse and distract people and how they are all silly.
You ought to have a look at
https://www.reddit.com/r/moonhoax/
A huge amount of this idiotic fake moon landing stuff is covered there. These people who say it’s fake post all sorts of stupidly, which in most cases is easily shown to be ignominious blathering. They keep repeating the same weak nonsense over and over.
“The reason I go on about this is that I think the whole “fake moon landing” op is nothing but a huge gaslighting attempt by the Jews to demoralize and degrade White people by the Jews… A huge amount of this idiotic fake moon landing stuff is covered there.”
I’m a physicist, so I know why the stars don’t show in the photos; know about pressure vessels, etc. And I see the war on white people being waged by Jews, I’m not blind to that. But I also have discovered, over the years, that most of the news is fake. Most of what our government tells us is lies. Much of science is not reproducible because it is fake. Academia makes up garbage like CRT, etc. So if someone doubts the moon landings, is skeptical about them, I understand why they might be.
My point was about credibility, about choosing your battles. No one is going to believe someone about gang stalking if they think that person is a moon landing denier.
I discourage both you and phelps from crafting any more long replies to me about the moon landing topic. I’m just not interested in it! I’m not going to read his book, or click on your links to the argument. No offense intended.
I’m literally a trained cinematographer. I have formal training in contrast ratios, luminance measurement and theory, film exposure, practical special effects techniques, effects of different film stocks, lens theory, telecine, etc. I have actual commercial projects under my belt filmed on 16mm film on location, both day and night. (They are 20 years ago, but the technology was still substantially the same at that point.)
FWIW, Stanley Kubrick had the same background, and appears to have been a doubter himself.
“…I discourage both you and phelps from crafting any more long replies to me about the moon landing topic. I’m just not interested in it!…”
Uhhhh…you brought it up.
Seriously. I haven’t written anything long on it in at least a year, probably more.
“Uhhhh…you brought it up.”
Sam J.,
No, phelps brought it up.
You said,”…“A part of me wonders too, if they did that to derail me even more.”
That’s what I thought about phelps’ comment trying to get me to believe the moon landings were faked…”
This made me think that you might have had questions on whether the moon landing was fake or not. There is some ambiguity in what you said. In fact, have no idea how you weigh on this because the statement is cryptic.
You said yourself,”…If you read closely, I didn’t deny phelps’ claim…”.
When I see someone questioning or possibly asking if it’s fake or not, I generally unleash a barrage of facts to show, yes we did land on the moon and that the people saying different are either mistaken or liars. And no I do not believe phelps is a lair nor would I ever call him one, but he is definitely mistaken about the moon landing and the facts he puts forward to explain why he says this is so.
I of course stoutly put forward that all this “fake moon landing” stuff is total nonsense. I do admit that I’m not as firm on Mars landings and some other NASA stuff. As the country has gotten more and more corrupt it’s become difficult to defend anything in this country, but the country was a different country back then.
You might believe I protest too much but I don’t think so. This is a campaign to demoralize and discredit Whites. I’ve had enough of that. At some point you have to draw a line and when it’s crossed you must loudly protest.
“There is some ambiguity in what you said. In fact, have no idea how you weigh on this because the statement is cryptic.”
Sam J.,
That was intentional.
I’ve never been a moon landing denier, and yes the country was different back then for sure. But the lying, the corruption, etc., all started before the Apollo Project.
The gaslighting machine was already in place for who knows how long. And since literally nearly everything we are told by government bureaucrats, MSM, academia, politicians, the medical community, and oligarchs is lies, I’ve developed a healthy skepticism about almost everything.
That said, I respect your POV about it, and don’t blame you for being fed up or for speaking out. We all have our line in the sand.
They have to see it. You can’t tell them. If you tell them what to look for, and then they see it, all the better. If you tell them what to look for without why and they see it, now you are gold.
FWIW, what flipped my wife was the people slowing me down in traffic, plus the high-rez photos of the Apollo LEM. She’s still viscerally angry about the Apollo footage being fake.
What high-rez photos?
Any of them. This one.
https://flic.kr/p/yKvmxu
That bubble gum and cardboard training mock up didn’t take men to the moon and bring them back.
Search for “Apollo high-rez photos” you’ll find plenty. 9,200. And BTW phelps has not one damn bit of evidence they are faked. Every single thing he points out as being fake has simple common sense explanations. He makes some real whoppers of mistakes on this subject. phelps may be super smart in legal situations and I appreciate his read on these things but, Moon landings, forget it. The Moon landing fake people are numerically challenged, logically challenged and technically challenged.
You ought to have a look at
https://www.reddit.com/r/moonhoax/
A huge amount of this idiotic fake moon landing stuff is covered there. These people who say it’s fake post all sorts of stupidly, which in most cases is easily shown to be ignominious blathering. These people are so sad. They keep repeating the same weak nonsense over and over.
I;ll give you one example. I figured this one out. The ignoramuses were jumping up and down saying the moon is 750 degrees or something like that. They have no sense at all. They don’t understand temperature. For example a cathode ray tube has a temperature of something like 15,000 degrees when the electron hits the screen.
I did what needed to be done and looked up just what was the level of sunlight on the moon. Here’s what I wrote,
From dumkiss,”…Any average imbecile knows that the human body can be severely burnt, not just by “heat”, but by radiations as well…”
Sam J.,”…And I say…so what? heat can burn people? Of course it can, but how much heat? If you strike a match next to someone say a foot away it will not burn them but if you light a flamethrower a foot away then…not good. So in fact you are saying things that are foolish and full of babbling nonsensical stupidity.
Sam J.,”…The never ending Jew gas-lighting where they proclaim stupid things is well in effect here.
You also “pretend” that the light from the Sun on the Moon is somehow SO MUCH MORE POWERFUL, but it’s not. As I said, the Suns power on the Moon is around 1,400 watts per square meter. Which is no big deal as a decent hair dryer is hotter.
On Earth it’s not much less but…it’s actually harder for the body to get rid of heat on the Earth. Why? Because as you hasbara keep telling us one side of an astronaut is at high temperature from the Sun but the other side is freezing. So all the heat from the Sun on one side is carried through his water cooling system to the other side into the freezing ” -250 F” shadow. So any extra heat is easily dumped on the cool side. On Earth if it gets you hot on the Sun side the “cool” side is still a 100F on a hot day. Harder to get rid of all that heat…”
From dumkiss,”…So please, pretty please, don’t attempt to defend White people with your nonsense, they don’t need being burdened by more nincompoops….”
Sam J.,I seriously doubt you are in any way aligned with or in any way wanting to help Whites. That I can provide simple common sense reasons refuting the flat earth, Jewed up, “the Moon landing is fake”, gas-lighters, and showing they are fakes means you are aligned with them
Let’s notice that the Sun’s level of light is around that of a good quality hair dryer blowing on a one meter square area. If an average human faces a hair dryer I suspect his frontal area would not be much more than a square meter. So I ask you if someone blows a hair dryer at you from far enough away to cover your whole body, will it burn you to a crisp? Of course not.
The guy who started all this fake moon stuff was a Jew and the reason he did it, or likely, is Jews always trying to destroy the society they live in. They always attempt to degrade and make derogatory statements about societies they live in to run them down and destroy them….”
Wall of text about dumbshit theories from someone not me.
Well, that’s me told.
I get all of that too, especially the people who just happen to step backward without looking as I pass behind them. I’ve had that most of my life. Cars that conveniently come out at the perfect moment no matter how little traffic there is. If I go into a mostly empty grocery store, two or three people will damned near sprint to the register before I can get there.
Eric, Have you ever talked with anyone about it? If so, what was their reaction?
The best reaction I get is a laugh. Otherwise, they tell me I’m imagining things, or that it must be a coincidence. This blog is one of the few places I get heads nodding when I bring it up.
One of the reasons I hate shopping with my wife is, while she’s looking at something, every place I stand to stay out of the way, somebody immediately shows up needing something from the shelf behind me. Even in an empty aisle, somebody will come as soon as my wife stops.
I get that too. I don’t shop malls much, but we all need to eat so I go to the grocery regularly. The thing is, I like to read the labels. I try to avoid anything that has gluten or industrial seed oils.
And when I was living in upstate NY, it was the worst. Every single time I’d stop to select something from a shelf full of choices (for example, which brand of ground pepper I wanted), multiple people would show up to get pepper. Then on to the canned tuna section and, what a surprise, same EXACT thing.
After leaving NY, I lived in a couple of Red states and it doesn’t happen with clockwork regularity the way it happened in NY. Make of that what you will.
[…] Surveillance Detection – Domestic Surveillance In Action – Two Video Examples […]