Democrats Want To Seize Guns Over “Non-Violent Hate Crimes”

It will even include Non-Violent Hate Crimes, whatever those are:

New York State Sen. Daniel Squadron, D-Manhattan, has a plan to snare conservatives into coughing up their gun rights.

Democrats have come up with a creative way of selectively confiscating guns from certain residents, and several Second Amendment watchdogs say the strategy could soon be coming to a state near you.

A state legislator from Manhattan has introduced a bill that would nullify gun rights from those convicted of hate crimes, even those involving nonviolent, misdemeanor offenses.

If successful, New York would become the seventh state to implement such a law.

The FBI defines a hate crime as a “criminal offense against a person or property motivated in whole or in part by an offender’s bias against a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, or gender identity.”

The reason the rabbits want this is that it will favor those who never say anything which would offend anyone. Once they get this, all they have to do is bring US hate crimes laws into line with Europe’s, where merely saying something critical of migrants will bring the hate crime charges.

Again, in r-selection Darwin favors those who avoid all conflict. This is r-strategists looking to use governmental force to enact r-selection. It isn’t conscious, it is just that rabbits feel more at ease existing in the environment they are designed for. As K-selection closes in, watch as the rabbits look more and more to use force of government to try and create the r-selected conditions they are designed for.

Tell others about r/K Theory, because you don’t want to be unable to engage in conflict

This entry was posted in Guns, ITZ, K-stimuli, Liberals, Politics, Psychology, r-stimuli, rabbitry. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
7 years ago

[…] Democrats Want To Seize Guns Over “Non-Violent Hate Crimes” […]

180degreesout
7 years ago

….so that they can pursue violent hate crimes?

“1. In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915-1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves against their ethnic-cleansing government, were arrested and exterminated.

2. In 1929, the former Soviet Union established gun control as a means of controlling the “more difficult” of their citizens. From 1929 to the death of Stalin, 40 million Soviets met an untimely end at the hand of various governmental agencies as they were arrested and exterminated.

3. After the rise of the Nazi’s, Germany established their version of gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves against the “Brown Shirts”, were arrested and exterminated. Interestingly, the Brown Shirts were eventually targeted for extermination themselves following their blind acts of allegiance to Hitler. Any American military and police would be wise to grasp the historical significance of the Brown Shirts’ fate.

4. After Communist China established gun control in 1935, an estimated 50 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves against their fascist leaders, were arrested and exterminated.

5. Closer to home, Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayans, unable to defend themselves against their ruthless dictatorship, were arrested and exterminated.

6. Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves from their dictatorial government, were arrested and exterminated.

7. Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million of the “educated” people, unable to defend themselves against their fascist government, were arrested and exterminated.

8. In 1994, Rwanda disarmed the Tutsi people and being unable to defend themselves from their totalitarian government, nearly one million were summarily executed.

The total numbers of victims who lost their lives because of gun control is approximately 70 million people in the 20th century. The historical voices from 70 million corpses speak loudly and clearly to those Americans who are advocating for a de facto gun ban. Governments murdered four times as many civilians as were killed in all the international and domestic wars combined. Governments murdered millions more people than were killed by common criminals and it all followed gun control.”

From.
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2015/10/30/america-should-be-asking-what-happens-to-a-nation-after-gun-confiscation/

timothyzak
7 years ago

Familiar with the term sakh’ara? It essentially means slave. Those who respond to Jihad with obeisance, offering unsolicited services and doing their bidding. It is one of the magical tricks of the prophet: he predicted it would happen, their reaction to threats gave evidence of divine sanction.

I won’t lie I have a few pretty r-traits. Strong fear response, bad time-preference. I was impatient to figure out what was going on, so I have kept the edge of my vision on some of the local islamist organizations. (The one that most worried me, surprise surprise, has been sending ISIS fighters to Syria – their head mullah is now recruited for counter radicalization)

The truth is, I have serious doubts that the Canadian government really understands what they’re dealing with. Islam’s mission continues until the apocalypse. Every single day they re-affirm their totalitarian mission. For intelligence agencies, attacks might occur on the background of normal activity. Do they realize that IT IS NORMAL activity.

They probably don’t know how costly it will be to stop these organizations, and there is absolutely no way they are willing to pay that price. I see no prospect of any move by any government to do anything except keep the lid on the pot. In term of election cycles that’s fine and dandy. Those of us who seriously contemplate decades and generations, ordinary people are going to suffer a very great deal until they’ve had enough. [Of course continued immigration and birth rate will, within a generation or two, leave very costly quandary indeed]

FrankNorman
FrankNorman
7 years ago

So these people blatantly just make up whatever rules they like?

Robert What?
Robert What?
7 years ago

The only thing that stopped the US from going full court press tyranny during the Obama administration was the Second Amendment.