“That dude was so angry he couldn’t see straight!”
Chris Brown suffers a non-epileptic seizure, due to extreme “emotional stress” from “negativity.”
Imagine getting so angry about a thought that your brain just loses control of parts of your body, and you are left watching them move without your authorization, or not move when you try to move them. This happens to people.
I like to think I am a pretty sharp guy, with a lot on the ball. I like to think that when it comes to reading and understanding others, I am on top of the game.
Yet, had I not seen firsthand what emotional attacks directed at Bob’s amygdala did to him physically, I could never have begun to understand what could be done to a person with just words and general thoughts, presented to them. Without that one firsthand experience, I could not even begin to really understand this. Before Bob, I would never have believed anyone, if they had told me the story I watched play out before me.
Yet now having seen it, when I heard Chris Brown had a seizure, my first question was whether it might have been an amygdala hijack. I quickly dismissed it, reasoning that drugs are ever present in his industry and seemed much more likely statistically but today, there it is.
The amygdala is real, and it controls everything in the brain, because it controls which single thought occupies your mind above all others. What that thought is, and how it is viewed, controls which brain structures come online, which brain structures go offline, and to what degree those called online are activated. That it flags the negative with greater sensitivity than the positive, that Liberals are insecure trolls absorbed with negativity, and that Liberal amygdalae are damaged in such a way as to magnify all of this is our gift from God, if we can manage to get our leaders to use it.
With this first seizure, Brown has now burned a new neural pathway into his head, going from thought to seizure. That he is so young when this happened is astonishing, and does not bode well for his future. If he has a malicious guy or girl who understands all this in his social circle, and they burn this in a few more times to deepen it, his life will become even more of a living hell than it already probably is.
Brown turned the ambulance away, after symptoms passed. Bob did this too, later on, though that first one was such a shock he willingly stayed at the ER, while they did CT’s and MRI’s, looking for the cause. No word on what the non-epileptic seizure Brown had was, but I would bet it involved his eyes and his vision.
I will also bet there will be more, but we will not hear about them. They will just become a normal part of his life, and he won’t even bother to call the ambulance.
It will be a living hell.
Did you read about Hugo Schwyzer’s recent meltdown(s)? This should look familiar to you.
here
also here but scroll down to read “goodbye” and “goodbye part 2”
Thank you for the link. I had seen that on Vox’s site, where he posted the pic of that guy in the Tutu – that dude is screwed up! I used to think that the Narc who experienced Bob’s level of cognitive suffering was a rarity. Maybe they congregate in the media, but I see more and more of them everywhere today. As things get more r, it will probably increase.
If I could communicate one thing to the readers here, it would be to experiment with the amygdala hijack on the irritating people you know. Focus a narc on something which troubles them, show no emotional involvement as you do it, and do it in such a way that you can claim deniability about fucking with their head. Just keep drawing them back to the troubling issue, and feign sympathy as you rehash how awful it must be for them, recounting all the different ways it must trouble them. Sooner or later you will hit a really screwed up narc, and see just how the fireworks will explode without warning, out of the seemingly placid waters the Narc tries to show you.
Suddenly you realize, a lot of evil people look normal only because they try to look normal very hard. But beneath it, they are hanging on to sanity by the thinnest of threads. Realizing the extent to which this is true, is a life changing alteration of perception. You will never look at any new people you meet the same again. And best of all, you will become more immunized to falling into the narc’s sphere.
Hugo is not the only crazynut who can be broken down at the drop of a hat.
Thanks again!
I’ve been practicing. Dang if you aren’t right! I had a long post on a lib site and at the very end I ended up with,”Someday you will be forced to admit you were wrong and will be forced to apologize to ALL.” You should have seen the spit and vitriol! A toothpick in the eye wouldn’t have produced a more insane response. I love this and I’m going to see if I can work this into the next town meeting.
I love hear from people who see this work, firsthand – thank you for that. More and more I am convinced that, as with Heartiste and the aloof alpha presentation in pickup, they key is an unemotional, hyper-calm, logical, detached presentation of the inevitability of their horrors. Emotion distracts their amygdala from the horror you are trying to focus it on, and detracts from your efforts. Wave your arms, yell, emphasize words, and they see all of that, and can’t focus on what you are saying. Just give them a, “Here is how it is, and I really couldn’t care less if you beleive me or not because what is coming will get you either way,” presentation.
Make your argument lead to out-grouping, box them into corners with logic to make them look dumb to the group and lower their status, highlight how the group loathes each of their r-selected morals, make them feel reality is coming for them inevitably in the form of the group allied against them, and emphasize how horrified they must be, given their situation. Even if they smile blankly at first, press on. Inside, things are firing up even as they try to hide it, and eventually, you may very well get a fun show. From my experience, I’m sure this response took some time and repetition to produce – it didn’t happen immediately. But hit that amygdala again and again, and it wears it down, and eventually, things start to get interesting.
The funny thing is, it is this very susceptibility which makes them Liberals. If they could face reality comfortably, they would face it and reasonably adjust their behavior to avoid the horror that is coming, and we wouldn’t be on the fast track to the Liberal’s worst nightmare of a civilizational collapse. Let’s face it, when the money is gone, the economy is collapsed, and the welfare Zombies come out to feed on the brains of the weak and helpless, theri will feed on the Liberals. If Liberals could face this reality and think, they would be at the front of the protests, demanding massive government cutbacks to avoid a collapse. But Liberals need to shield that defective amygdala or they end up in agony, so they adopt Liberalism, and bring about a situation that will be a million-fold worse for them than simply shrinking government and making the poor work for a living.
They are made weak by the very nature of what they are.
It’s interesting that you mention vision. I’ve had panic attacks that bordered on being seizure like though I’m no liberal. I also have a terrible temper. When I grow angry sometimes I’ll see spots or my vision will become cloudy. I wonder if you have any information or insights to share on this. What can a person do to prevent these things? Would something like meditation work to create new neural pathways?
I’ve read some of your writings. My gut take on you was your fundamental neurological structure is sound, but you have something going on that is wearing on it, from the outside.
I’ve dabbled in a lot of different subjects over the years, looking to get ahead in the race for insights. One of those subjects is Traditional Chinese Medicine, which has basically involves 6000 years of very observant, brilliant people making observations of people with illnesses, and noting every subtle facet of their physical and mental status, and where there are correlations. It is one of those areas filled with the types of observations, which mixed with a grasp of science and underlying mechanisms, can allow you to jump ahead very quickly in your understanding of the system.
The link between the emotion of anger and vision, above, is one from TCM, that I suspect relates to the neurobiology of humans. Your propensity to anger is an imbalance TCM would see as very fixable, and unrelated to who you are (unlike a personality disorder, which is more a structural issue). That you see your vision alter when it flares is expected, within their theory. There may also be other manifestations according to TCM theory, particularly relating to joint mobility, posture, gait, and there will be other health problems which could arise later, if you do not address it at this stage (cholesterol seems to be one for some reason, as does hip and knee arthritis, perhaps to to gait issues relating to how the body moves differently under anger). This type of imbalance is not seen as permanent, but rather is viewed as a temporary slip out of balance, and something which can be massaged back into balance, at which point the symptoms would abate, and the system would go on in balance, or require periodic minor tune-ups.
TCM spent thousands of years cataloging these things, and tricks by which to alter them. They have herbs that push the various imbalances in specific ways, and a way to seemingly hack into the brain with acupuncture, and manipulate these balances there. Having viewed experts at it operate, I was awed by the skills they had developed, but the efficacy of it depends very heavily on both the innate skill, and the experience, of the practitioner. It is not scientific, in that they have not identified the actual mechanisms by which it works, or even exactly what they are doing biochemically and neurologically, but they do have a sort of quick and dirty system of addressing these more minor, non-lethal complaints. And those who have practiced it for decades have developed the most amazing ability to “cold-read” a person’s past, through an understanding of the most common mechanisms by which what they see tends to be produced.
From what I have seen and what you describe, I would bet you would experience a high level of awe that would haunt you the rest of your life, were you to find a good practitioner, and go to them for several months.
Best,
AC
“That it flags the negative with greater sensitivity than the positive, that Liberals are insecure trolls absorbed with negativity, and that Liberal amygdalae are damaged in such a way as to magnify all of this is our gift from God, if we can manage to get our leaders to use it.”
Chris Brown is “liberal”? I knew 11 self professed “socially, economically and politically” people (as they claimed) and they tended toward positivity. That could be in part due to their meditation methods. I guess that’s some sort of amygdalae stimutional/third eye activation.
My guess is Chris Brown would suport Obama. Also, like other Liberals, I would expect him to show up to support a gun control rally, yet carry a gun himself, and support higher taxes by his Democrat peeps, yet try to cling to his own money all the same.
>I knew 11 self professed “socially, economically and politically”
>(liberal) people (as they claimed) and they tended toward positivity. That
>could be in part due to their meditation methods.
I should point out, you meditate. Meditation is a conscious effort to quiet anxiety in the amygdala, such as this site maintains is produced by underdevelopment in these types of characters, and Liberals. How many Conservatives do you think practice meditation? Is that because they are less evolved and intelligent than you, or is it because you experience some cognitive force which makes meditation highly beneficial to you, to the point that you actually made it your screen name, and presumably do it every day.
Plus as I poitned out in the other post, Liberals, if you follow the literature, are likely to be less able to read emotional cues. So I also question if your read of your friends is correct, or if they have a sort of “Heaven’s Gate Cult” happiness going on outside, while they slice off their peens and nads in private, and you’ve mistaken that for genuine positivity.
Food for thought.
Good points/observations psychologically AC. Reduction to “A” versus “B” – conservativism versus liberalism though? Hmmm.
Whether it’s psycho-biological, or a genetically altering life experience, (inherited or suffered) the lack of moderation, illustrated in the undercurrent in your repetetive vehemence against narcissists, shows a lack of personal historical evolution.
In otherwords, moderation in all things, id, ego, or pigeon-holing into a) or b)? Is that too much “grey” matter? 😉 Seriously though, widen the microns, in the all-or-nothing ‘liberalness in conservatism’ net.
The funny thing about this statement is that I see the vehemence of my contempt as a measure of my evolution. I went from amusement at some Narcissists, to total ignorance, to sympathy over their mental debility, to the full understanding I have today. I do not encourage any person who deals with Narcissists to have any sympathy, or to view them as anything but pure evil, because if you have any empathy at all, the Narcissist will detect it, and swiftly move to use it against you. You have to know the psychology inside and out.
God Bless you if you’ve never plumbed the depths of the Narcisssitic mind. I have, and these are the conclusion I have come to. I can’t really change a position I believe in ardently, so readers will have to examine the site, try to gauge my intelligence, see if I am promoting any agenda, and see if they think the case I make is a strong enough one, or if I am off base. Caveat Emptor.