Black Democrat Strategist Ridicules White Trump Supporter Attacked By Mob

A good example of artificial in-grouping and out-grouping with a twist:

Former press secretary to Bernie Sanders and Democratic strategist Symone Sanders mocked and dismissed a Donald Trump supporter who was beat up by a Chicago mob on CNN Monday because he was white…

“What do you say to the people who dragged a poor white guy out of a car and beat him?” asked Higbie.

“Oh my goodness, poor white people! Please!” she responded. “Oh my– stop. Stop, Carl.”

She genuinely doesn’t care what happens to whites.

One thing I find interesting is the in-grouping of wealthier blacks, who have no resource restriction. It is as if the ancient triggers that produce in-grouping, ie shortage, harshness, violence, competitive environments, attacks by out-groups, are able to have their effect, even through vicarious means.

That is if you take a wealthy individual, who would otherwise be predisposed to r, and begin telling them from an early enough time about the “wrongs” inflicted on “their people,” and the harshness their people endured, and the hostile out-groups who have wronged their people, then you can produce an individual who exhibits a very strong in-grouping instinct.

The media seems to recognize this, constantly bombarding minority communities with stories of their people being wronged, the hostile out-groups doing the wronging, and the shortage they have been wrongly forced to endure. Whites, by contrast are bombarded with constant stories of their people’s wrongness, and all stories of any transgression against whites by any other groups are assiduously ignored.

I find it interesting from the standpoint that it appears to be a means by which to artificially engender an in-grouped, K-psychology in a population. It works despite ambient conditions, by simply presenting vicarious K-stimuli to the individual. I will bet, like mortal salience stimuli, it will drive the K’s in a population more conservative across all measures of conservatism, and not just in-grouping.

Much of this site maintains there can be no fighting the tides of r and K, meaning that if a society succeeds, there is little choice but to endure the slide toward r. This might be a case study in a way to structure the environmental signals bombarding a population to maintain at least one aspect of a K-psychology, even in the face of free resource availability.

This may point to the fact that while there is little a normal individual can do to facilitate a K-shift, individuals like Andrew Breitbart and Donald Trump, through their ability to present stimuli widely, might be able to have an effect. Of course the catch is, they must present stimuli that, as one would expect, the liberal media will be horrified by.

Still, it would be nice if the next wave of success we encounter didn’t end with us importing millions of third world rapists and murderers that practice a religion that is fundamentally incompatible with Western Civilization.

This is how we could prevent that – and we probably will not lack for stories of the horrors inflicted on Westerners to do it with.

You might enjoy telling others about these raving reviews of r/K Theory at Amazon, because you like how Trump won the election