Are We All Charlie Hebdo?

Vox makes the case we should stand with Charlie Hebdo on principle. Perhaps.

The problem I see is, the left imported the Muslim threat. Then the leftists at Charlie Hebdo inflamed it with leftist snark to the point that it began shooting at them, and even killed innocent citizens in the Kosher Deli. Now they want everyone to “stand with them,” which really means fight the enemy they imported and angered, while they hide under the table, so they won’t have to face the consequences of their own stupidity.

The New York Times Newspaper Headline on The Charlie Hebdo Attacks

Indeed, the rabbits in the media can’t even be persuaded to publish the new Charlie Hebdo cartoon, in their articles about it. The NY Times article on the new cartoon made it a point to mention twice that they would not publish it, lest any future jihadi mistaken believe that they would consider offending radical Islamist sensibilities and target the Times, instead of the Police and Military personnel the rabbits want to fight this battle for them. Oxford University Press will expect that everyone else will fight for them, even as they ban any mention of pigs or pork in their books, lest some Muslim somewhere get offended and try to target them specifically. Obama himself is so uncommitted to this fight that he couldn’t even find one administration official to march in France, in token support of the victims of the attacks.

The radical Muslims need to be killed when they do this type of thing. Nor should we tolerate that type of violence in our society. But what if we made it clear that our position was that the Muslims could have at the leftist rabbits, and that we didn’t want to get involved in the fight? What would the left do, if every police officer, military man, and patriotic citizen said, “No, we aren’t Charlie Hebdo. We didn’t want to import the radical Muslims to begin with, and we aren’t the ones who then went out of our way to piss them off. You Leftists created this entire problem yourself, now you can go deal with it yourself. You are not our people, and they are only killing you, so why should we get involved?”

That would be more logical. The only difference compared to what the left is doing now would be that we wouldn’t haven’t started the fight that the leftists would then pay for. Now it is the left importing the fighters, starting the fight, drawing us into it, and then seeking to avoid the conflict by not offending the enemy, so the enemy will focus on us. As one article on it noted,

Every media outlet that refuses to publish the image raises the risk, however marginally, to the ones who do. That’s why Charlie Hebdo was targeted to begin with. A small French paper shouldn’t be on jihadis’ radar screens, but if they’re one of only a handful globally willing to publish images of Mohammed…

More and more, I think we need to split the population into r and K, and let the r’s fend for themselves. There would be no better way to train their amygdala to realize that actions have consequences, than to let them think that when they import radical ideologies, they will not be rescued by anyone else from having to live under the rules of that radical ideology. If a gay promiscuous woman supports importing a radical Muslim, then let her answer to him when she wants to drive, learn to read, dress comfortably, wear makeup, engage in lesbianism, or have affairs with other men’s wives. If she can’t sway her imported radical friend’s judgment, why should we then have to step in with force on her behalf? After the radical Muslims spend a few decades culling the low-hanging fruit that is the helpless rabbit herd, then we could step in and remove the threat before it begins presenting itself to us.

An additional advantage would be that by that time, few rabbits would balk at doing what needed to be done. Now, the rabbit’s position seems to be, “Surround us as we offend the violent Muslims we just imported, so when they start killing people, you will die first.”

That is a fool’s proposition, offered by cowards and imbeciles. We would be equally stupid to ally with them.