The piece is about an NYPD rookie cop who, while on foot patrol, tried to juggle a flashlight, a gun, and opening a door all at the same time, and accidently squeezed a round off that bounced down a stairwell and hit a citizen in the chest. From a cursory look at the case, it appeared clearly accidental, and yet the cop was tried and convicted of manslaughter, with the jury finding he had intent to fire the round.
In the video piece about the conviction, at the 1:50 minute mark an older juror with a white beard came out and was asked about the verdict, and he began by shaking his head and saying, “I have a family… It was a very tough verdict.”
The video was emailed with the implication that it was BlackLivesMatters who had threatened the juror’s family, and left him feeling no choice but to convict. I had intended to blog on it, but was overtaken by events.
Still, something never felt right about it. Of course in the old paradigm, #BlackLivesMatters was a ragtag collection of 80 IQs railing at the sky over Police Shootings of criminals.
First you wouldn’t have thought they would have the intel capabilities or organization to track down a juror, nor would they have the boldness to threaten his family. Moreover, you would think that the Juror would immediately report the threat without any fear, which would have resulted in the NYPD being greenlighted to deal with the threatener.
The NYPD has evolved into an impressive force to deal with such a thing. It is essentially a standing army of 40,000 armed officers with its own special operations wing, aviation wing, technical services/technology wing, and all supported by an intelligence agency employing some former CIA personnel that operates all over the globe. There are entire countries which don’t have anything close to the NYPD’s capabilities in their national army and intelligence services.
Why would that juror have felt so afraid he would let a threat by some rag tag “community activist” affect his verdict. Why would he be afraid to even report it? And why tell the media about it? And how could Blacklivesmatter even feel comfortable approaching the juror in the modern surveillance state? It doesn’t fit with the old paradigm of #BlackLivesMatters as a simple grassroots organization.
But it makes more sense viewed in light of the Cabal paradigm, especially in light of this article:
Journalist Tracy Beanz uncovered an explosive detail about former Attorney General Loretta Lynch buried deep in the report from the Department of Justice’s Office of Inspector General that was released last week.
In a series of tweets, Beanz details how the OIG report states Lynch threatened to reopen the case into Eric Garner if the New York Police Department leaked information about former New York Congressman Anthony Weiner. At the time, Weiner was being investigated by the NYPD and DOJ for sending and receiving lewd text messages with an underage girl.
Eric Garner died from a heart attack while being arrested by officers, and Lynch was threatening to prosecute the officers for his death just to punish the NYPD. It sounds kind of like this case.
The back story was, Weiner’s laptop had Huma’s insurance file, and whatever was on it was so horrific that NYPD was bucking its reins, wanting to release it to set off the war against the Cabal right there.
Q alleged that to emphasize their point, Cabal’s US domestic intelligence operation wound up Alexander Bonds, one of the MK-Ultra windup toys they had been playing with. They convinced him he was being persecuted by the Police until he acquired a gun and began saying he would do it on social media. Then they turned him loose in New York city with the gun, allowing him to kill officer Miosotis Familia in an ambush attack. Supposedly it was all to drive home to NYPD just how much damage Cabal could inflict on the NYPD if they chose to.
Clearly Cabal was trying to flex its muscles over NYPD at the time through Loretta Lynch. Cabal could have approached that juror easily, done it without concern about being caught in any surveillance webs, and done it in such a way that the juror would have felt helpless to do anything to resist the approach. America doesn’t operate the way you were told once Cabal walks in the door. That juror’s statement to the press could have been a form of resistance.
These archival articles are not necessarily the final truth on any issue. With Cabal, you do not get a clear picture of exactly what is going on. These articles are designed to accumulate strange data-points which do not seem to fit in the old paradigm, but which might make much more sense if you assume there is a Cabal of elites somewhere, operating behind the scenes from the highest points of power, trying to assert total control over the United States.
A lot of people are going to breathe a lot easier when the Storm cleans all of this out of the nation.
Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because the Cabal is everywhere
AC,
This seems relevant. Off of Neon’s site:
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/08/10/now-they-all-lose-newq-qanon-greatawakening/
https://fionabarnett.org/2018/06/08/watergate-was-pedogate/
“The Watergate break-in was strictly based on one thing – the pedophile records that were being kept at the Democratic National Headquarters.”
– Det. James Rothstein, NYPD, Retired
Wow. Interesting.