Another Rabbit, Another Idea Of How To Rear Offspring

From Britain:

A few of you might remember a horrific case in the United Kingdom a few years ago, where a Family Court judge ordered what amounted to a medical rape, sending a “mentally incompetent” teenage girl to get an abortion against her will. The girl was firmly opposed to the abortion. Experts in the trial testified that an abortion would “cause considerable harm to this young girl.” But, the judge responded that because he felt she should have an abortion, it was better to leave “to one side her own wishes and feelings” and conclude—as he did—that “it would be in her best interests to have a termination.” At his orders, the poor girl was sent off for an abortion that she desperately did not want and that even the experts testified would deeply hurt her.

That judge’s name is Sir James Munby, and he is now in the news again. This time, according to the Daily Mail, he is now “Britain’s most senior family judge” and, with that in mind, he has a message for Britons: “The collapse of the nuclear family should be welcomed and applauded.” Families, Munby said, are now impossible to define, which is why he is calling for an overhaul to Britain’s marriage laws, including the introduction of “fault-free divorces,” because it is apparently not easy enough to obtain a divorce as it is. He has already successfully campaigned for the government to change surrogacy laws to allow single people as well as couples to access surrogacy, so he’s proven quite an effective lobbyist for his dystopia of broken families.

He has also ruled Catholic birth parents should have no say in whether their children are adopted by homosexuals, and has been involved in trying to make divorce even easier in Britain.

Notice, the idea of a mother and father forming a permanent bond and carefully raising offspring in a traditional manner seems almost repulsive to him. And a child itself has no worth, and can simply be discarded if rearing it appears it will take “too much” effort.

There is something fundamentally missing in his perceptions of life, and what is important about it. It is like trying to explain to the rabbit the bond between a wolf mom and her pups, or packmates with each other.

There is a picture below. Down mouth, gay nasolabial line which makes him look as if he is about to scrunch up his nose in response to a bad smell, but I found his eyes interesting. I am not sure I can fully communicate the feeling I get looking at them or divine the exact quality I am seeing but I will try:

Notice how the bottom-most edge of his upper eyelid is obscured, and the lashes are almost covered by a fold of the skin under his eyebrow, which sags down over and folds over the outer skin of the upper eyelid. There is even a thin quality to the skin, which crease a sharp edge to the fold at the eye. I also notice almost swelling, beneath the skin immediately under the eyebrow, which pushes it out, almost even with the browridge as it drops down. The swelling aspect may be more noticeable here, where you notice he almost has no brow-ridge:

One thing I notice is women, trying to appear attractive, seem to use eye makeup and eye lash treatments to emphasize the eyelid edge, and demonstrate an absence of this quality, and the absence lends to attractiveness:

If you follow his right eyelid (our left) in the first photo, to the outer corner, the upper skin under the eyebrow actually folds over crisply with a sharp edge and the fold continues past the outer edge of the eye, creating a small pocket of hidden skin, under a fold of skin with a downward curve toward the edge. That downward curving fold is probably what is triggering my amygdala the most, combined with the swelling of that area under the eyebrow which eliminate the brow ridge, and it is all reminding me of all the people I have known with that quality. It also creates an appearance of drooping of the outer edges of the eyes downward. If I had to pick an opposite to that downward sloping trait of the eyes for comparison, it would probably be the model Grace Jones, who accentuated the upward sweeping of her outer eyes here with makeup:

I can’t say why, but I find the eyes that are level, or rise at the outer edges more trustworthy than that sloping quality at the out edges. I am sure Grace is a nutty as an Almond Joy, but I would still trust her light years before I would trust Munsby, knowing nothing else about them but for that eye quality.

Here is a shot of Dick Marcinko, founder of SEAL Team Six, who does not have the downward curving fold quality at the out edge, or the skin under the eyebrow obscuring the front of his upper eyelid. Notice how you can clearly see the upper eyelashes, and the front of the eyelid itself, and most importantly, no fold:

Another pic of him when younger, and you can see the upper eyelid and lashes, even with his eyebrows low:

These are probably the quintessential eyes of the warrior, and I don’t need to know his history, before judging him likely to be a stable guy you could rely on.

In both Munby’s and Marcinko’s first picture, the subject is raising their eyebrows, in sort of the opposite of anger. Munby’s seems more of a perpetual thing, probably related to a conflict avoidant psychology, while Marcinko is just trying to momentarily relax his interlocutor so they can fully consider a point he is making. The point being the quality is structural and cannot be attributed to the eyebrow position. I imagine if Marcinko dropped his eyebrows, and squinted enough he could obscure the upper eyelid, but clearly if Munby did that it almost appears as if the skin under the eyebrow would balloon out and fold down right over the entire eye. If you go back and look at the first picture, in some ways, it almost looks as if he is holding his eyebrows high to lift that skin up and keep it from draping down over the eyes.

The people I have known with Munby’s eyelids have all been liberals. Most prominent a male who, when his family was under threat from some actors, conclusively asserted to everyone there was no threat to be met, and demanded everyone ignore it and pretend it wasn’t there. The threat happened to leave with their stuff without attacking them but it was pure luck and Divine providence. In the same situation, I would have undoubtedly killed someone, and maybe a few – the threat was that bad that the only response would have been immediate, and overwhelming violence to eradicate it. I don’t even go into details here, because if this site ever came to their attention, I would feel bad pointing this out, for humiliating his innocent wife with what a coward he was.

Secondmost comes to mind a surgeon who actually clearly promised one operation to somebody I knew, with detailed questioning making certain there was no confusion. Once they were under anesthesia and on the table, he gave them a completely different, vastly more expensive operation with a several-month long difference in recovery, and then denied any prior agreement after the fact and attributed it all to confusion.

There was a female leftist I wouldn’t trust, and a few others. The fact is, I cannot think of anyone I have ever seen, even on TV and in media, who has had that upper swollen skinfold-over-eyelid, and downward sloping outer eyelid-pocket-fold who I have ever thought of as trustworthy or steadfast in principle. I have no idea why that is. Maybe I prefer a little aggressive brow-ridge and more aggressive countenance to feel comfortable with someone. Or maybe that eyelid configuration arises from some expression that is only frequently exhibited by the untrustworthy, or it is one trait of a suite that travel together and are associated with untrustworthiness.

I would assume, given the variation in nature, that there are people with it who might turn out to be OK. But whenever I see it now, I always assume I am dealing with danger.

I mainly bring it up because I am hopeful that in Apocalypse we will be culling the herd in such large numbers that any enhancement of our ability to quickly separate friend from foe will be of immense use.

Tell others about r/K Theory, because it is all in the eyes