A California state lawmaker at the forefront of the #MeToo movement faces a growing number of sexual misconduct allegations herself. Four former employees filed a formal complaint against Democratic Assemblywoman Cristina Garcia. Another says he was fired after protesting when she suggested playing “spin the bottle.”
Garcia has authored numerous bills about sexual assault and consent. She was even recently featured in Time magazine’s “Persons of the Year” issue recognizing the #MeToo movement’s “silence breakers.” But now she is on voluntary leave, as investigators look into claims she groped two men.
Daniel Fierro was working in the California State Capitol when he said Garcia cornered him at a staff softball game.
“I remember feeling a little confused about what happened,” Fierro said.
“She touched you sexually?” Villarreal asked.
“Yea, she — her hand dropped down. She touched – she grabbed my butt. And I spun to turn around … and as I turned, she tried to reach for my crotch and she did,” Fierro said.
When Villarreal asked Garcia whether Fierro’s claims happened, Garcia said, “No.”
“What do you remember happening that day?” Villarreal asked.
“I was at the game at the end of the game… And I left with some staff and with some members, and so I have faith that the investigation will make sure and have the facts around it and clear my name,” Garcia said.
A second unnamed accuser also claims Garcia made a graphic sexual proposal before groping him, something she denies.
The four former state employees that have filed the formal complaint allege Garcia talked openly about “sexual activities with other elected officials,” claimed to have sex in “assembly offices” and said “having sex… was a good way of getting information.”
So if this happened to you, what are the two possible explanations you would see for it? As a hint, one is that the Assemblywoman was feeling frisky and wanted sex or validation. Had she been hot in her youth, this would be a likely option.
The second option is she is looking to compromise you somehow. Get a load of that last quote:
The four former state employees that have filed the formal complaint allege Garcia talked openly about “sexual activities with other elected officials,” claimed to have sex in “assembly offices” and said “having sex… was a good way of getting information.”
Would you have ever made that quote? Would you ever say sex is a good way to get information?
I would assume she thinks in those terms because she was turned onto it by someone assigning her to “get information.” And if she was turned onto it by an external actor, she is probably still in the network, hence her cushy job as Assemblywoman. These young guys may have been people the network ID’d as having potential to move up the ladder and fill various slots, and she was told to see if she could leverage her power over them to get them into her offices, having sex with her.
If you look at the Assemblywoman’s picture, she is the typical Sotomayor-esque 5 foot, 200lb latino Goblino, so I view her as simply a female latino version of Roger Ailes, who himself did the same thing, as well as monitored employees more broadly. I would assume this assemblywoman would have had cameras in her office recording trysts, so those dumb enough to have sex with her in “Assembly Offices” would quickly find the video of their shame captured for posterity and used to wrangle them into positions within the machine.
It seems strange to think this way, but this is how the intel game is played where it has reason to exist. Lately Q has implied that someone, possibly the Clintons, leaked our entire Chinese spy network, presumably for personal profit. From an article on that loss:
Those who rejected the mole theory attributed the losses to sloppy American tradecraft at a time when the Chinese were becoming better at monitoring American espionage activities in the country. Some F.B.I. agents became convinced that C.I.A. handlers in Beijing too often traveled the same routes to the same meeting points, which would have helped China’s vast surveillance network identify the spies in its midst.
Some officers met their sources at a restaurant where Chinese agents had planted listening devices, former officials said, and even the waiters worked for Chinese intelligence.
You don’t get the best intelligence sending the guys in suits and sunglasses. You get the best intelligence sending the family friend the target has known for decades. You get the best intelligence from the service person the target ignores the moment they see their uniform. You get the best intelligence from their boss trying to bang them, or the stripper who offers to do drugs with them, or the criminal serving time with them in their cell, who pitches them on a crime when they get out. You get the best intelligence from the person that only the most paranoid would suspect. So when someone is sent to you, it will be the person who you would have to be insanely paranoid to suspect. As a result, if you are a target, you can only harden yourself to intelligence gathering through a deep and pervasive sense of paranoia.
If you are going to be a target in the coming Apocalypse, and more and more it looks like everyone will be, you need to stay paranoid – the more the better.
Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because information war is war
It made me laugh when Sheila Jackson Lee said the KKK was a bigger threat than ISIS. That’s pretty typical of how left-wing cops think and act. Obamatron FBI cucks scour the nation for domestic threats while actual foreign spies operate unimpeded, by the tens of thousands. Do they secure IT? No. Did they secure the OPM? No. And to our mulatto bureau soylets, what is a domestic “threat” you ask? Anything that inconveniences a minority with power, even a lowly cop. Chinese intel would have a field day with these freaks from Cali, just like they did with the Clintons. What’s the risk? Well, there’s a reason Zuckerberg learned Chinese.
QANON Is Compromised, Period. Old Q Wasn’t Wrong
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2PjA3aQjmI
I find this persuasive and I’ve been suspicious for a long time and major so since Las Vegas.
On the one hand, we should find out because if he is, Trump will have to shut it down, and harshly, probably through Alex Jones, who owes him for the interview or Breitbart. Trump cannot allow that to distract and ultimately demotivate his followers.
On the other hand, your video’s poster’s entire account was terminated when I went to check it right after you posted. That does kind of reek of Deep State.
What did the video say?
Dave Cullen’s hit it out of the park again….
r/K Flipping the Monopoly board.
https://youtu.be/JKaXAU7bGoQ
The skeptic is worth his weight in gold. The skeptic who develops and maintains a precise focus is going to be the new prophet. He will be sought, as the globalists and communists and authoritarians become more desperate.